Mozza
Member
I knew it..............lolA sales number written on a plaque in a museum is as legitimate as a poster sized cardboard check.
I knew it..............lolA sales number written on a plaque in a museum is as legitimate as a poster sized cardboard check.
Shawn Layden, several years after leaving Sony, confirmed that the final number of PS2's was 160,636,855.
He also confirmed the final PSP total of 82,523,607.
PS2 deniers are hilarious. Gaming's flat earthers.
Shawn Layden, several years after leaving Sony, confirmed that the final number of PS2's was 160,636,855.
He also confirmed the final PSP total of 82,523,607.
PS2 deniers are hilarious. Gaming's flat earthers.
Touchy subject obviously.Dude, the Switch is literally 5 million units away — it's going to pass the PS2. At this point it's almost guaranteed.
And honestly, I'm not even interested in debating the "accuracy" of Sony's numbers. It's a pointless argument. We literally have a picture of the final manufactured PS2 unit. If people think it's that easy — or even that important — then sure, why doesn't Nintendo just claim they sold 200 million Switches while they're at it? Yay, problem solved.
Nothing fake about the way the presented it. You just didn't like it.Alright but then Sony for some reason went out of their way to present their real data in the fakest way possible. Their choice but don't get offended if people don't believe you.
Nothing? Usually companies don't wait 12 years to say how much they soldNothing fake about the way the presented it. You just didn't like it.
The theory was that Sony was presenting the PS2 sales data as PS3 data on their financial reports at time, to hide the poor sales performance of PS3… PS3+PS2= PS3 on the report, so, we didn't had any methods to know the real PS2 sales data by that time or any official information… The issue here is that they never subtracted the PS2 sales for the PS3 total sales at the end…and the PS3 end up selling more than the 360… The reality is that something is really fishy in all this.Alright but then Sony for some reason went out of their way to present their real data in the fakest way possible. Their choice but don't get offended if people don't believe you.
Please stop and seek some help..At least Sony has some form of mention of Vita on their page though. I can't find any mention of why VB would be absent.
I was thinking there'd at least be some note saying 'only system above 1M units are disclosed' or something.
You are allowed to question many things on here, but not the revised PS2 total lol...We prefer 'revisionists'.
Nah nothing fake about that, you just didn't like the number hence it became suspicous.Nothing? Usually companies don't wait 12 years to say how much they sold
The Sony report is in a few hours, that will be a fun thread to watch.And... thread derailed into some stupid bickering over PS2 data
Seems -10% of Nin "on weak sales, weak profit" was too much, now Nin fans needs something else to concentrate on
This is not the case at all. The PS2 selling 160m absolutely lines up with PS3 figures and other figures Sony have given in the past. We can even get the number for Vita sales which they don't disclose.The theory was that Sony was presenting the PS2 sales data as PS3 data on their financial reports at time, to hide the poor sales performance of PS3… PS3+PS2= PS3 on the report, so, we didn't had any methods to know the real PS2 sales data by that time or any official information… The issue here is that they never subtracted the PS2 sales for the PS3 total sales at the end…and the PS3 end up selling more than the 360… The reality is that something is really fishy in all this.
Nah that's conspiracy theory.The issue here is that they never subtracted the PS2 sales for the PS3 total sales at the end…and the PS3 end up selling more than the 360… The reality is that something is really fishy in all this.
We don't have a financial report from the PS3 era with PS2 and PS3 separate sales data, you can check by yourself… At least the latest.Nah that's conspiracy theory.
I know, I even said it before you in this very threadWe don't have a financial report from the PS3 era with PS2 and PS3 separate sales data, you can check by yourself… At least the latest.
And they did a lot of creative accounting back then, disclosing production numbers first before switching to shipping numbers, and then gathering PS2 and PS3 sales to hide the bad PS3 sales early on.
SW2 in 7 months did what SW2 did in 14.
Thinking this is only because of Japan is silly talk
The theory was that Sony was presenting the PS2 sales data as PS3 data on their financial reports at time, to hide the poor sales performance of PS3… PS3+PS2= PS3 on the report, so, we didn't had any methods to know the real PS2 sales data by that time or any official information… The issue here is that they never subtracted the PS2 sales for the PS3 total sales at the end…and the PS3 end up selling more than the 360… The reality is that something is really fishy in all this.
You are allowed to question many things on here, but not the revised PS2 total lol...
Again? How many times do I need to explain you that the Switch 2 costs 50k yen and there's no way to take advantage of the exchange rate?It makes sense when you realize that Switch 2 sells for $340USD in Japan and $450USD+ everywhere else...
Agree with you, it was presented as PS, not PS3, but they did that to hide the PS3 issue by that time. Sony numbers weren't clear at all in terms of sales to differentiate the PS2 data and the PS3 data, and obviously was on purpose. And before the 160M PS2 sold we had another update that put the PS2 over the DS… I remember that pretty clearly. But back on topic of the thread.This is false. The PS2 and PS3 numbers were combined. PS2 sales were never presented as PS3 sales. It was presented as the combined numbers of PlayStation sales as a whole. Falsely presenting PS2 as PS3 numbers to stock holders would be illegal.
Agree with you, it was presented as PS, not PS3, but they did that to hide the PS3 issue by that time. Sony numbers weren't clear at all in terms of sales to differentiate the PS2 data and the PS3 data, and obviously was on purpose. And before the 160M PS2 sold we had another update that put the PS2 over the DS… I remember that pretty clearly. But back on topic of the thread.
Imagine if somehow PS5 sold over 7M consoles during last quarter. This forum won't be able to handle that.The Sony report is in a few hours, that will be a fun thread to watch.
It was not that simple, if it was like that them we knew the exact numbers of PS2 sold by that time… They started giving the PS3 numbers again based in the total of PS systems that they were reporting before without any clarification. There comes the issue for me. Also, did you have any source that the last update of DS was on 2016?… That's basically a year before the Switch launched and years into the 3DS.They were definitely trying to hide the PS3 poor sales, but they eventually went back to reporting them individually. It's a footnote in PS history, but irrelevant today.
The PS2 155m sold was announced in 2012. DS announced 154m sold in 2016.
And probably above Switch 2, i expect that. If the PS5 end up selling more than the Switch 2 in 2025 that's another story.Imagine if somehow PS5 sold over 7M consoles during last quarter. This forum won't be able to handle that.
It was not that simple, if it was like that them we knew the exact numbers of PS2 sold by that time… They started giving the PS3 numbers again based in the total of PS systems that they were reporting before without any clarification. There comes the issue for me. Also, did you have any source that the last update of DS was on 2016?… That's basically a year before the Switch launched and years into the 3DS.
They must've sold more than 7M, they've been outperforming every quarter so far compared to FY2024, and iirc they managed upwards of to 10M(!) in Q3 2024.Imagine if somehow PS5 sold over 7M consoles during last quarter. This forum won't be able to handle that.
There's no way to know that, because they never clarified that…Thats the issue. A nintendo give updates on sales numbers in every financial. The DS didn't reach 154M in 2016.We did know the exact number sold when Sony reported the numbers separately again and not combined. The separated PS3 numbers were based on PS3 sold. The separated PS2 numbers were based on the PS2 sold. This is a non-issue.
I got the DS sales updates from wikipedia which has every reported number cited:
Nintendo DS sales - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
yep but the last ~25mn sold into ASia somewhere excluding Japan after the PS3 launched.Exactly
Code:PlayStation 2 Hardware Unit Sales (Unit Million) FY Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar FY LTD _____________________________________________________________________ FY 1999/00 - - - 1.4 1.4 1.4 FY 2000/01 1.1 1.0 2.9 4.2 9.2 10.6 FY 2001/02 4.3 4.6 5.4 3.7 18.1 28.7 FY 2002/03 4.6 8.3 8.0 1.6 22.5 51.2 FY 2003/04 2.7 8.8 6.8 1.8 20.1 71.3 FY 2004/05 0.7 2.0 7.4 6.1 16.2 87.5 FY 2005/06 3.5 5.0 5.4 2.3 16.2 103.7 FY 2006/07 2.3 3.4 6.7 2.4 14.7 115.6 FY 2007/08 2.7 3.3 5.4 2.4 13.7 129.3 FY 2008/09 1.5 2.5 2.5 1.4 7.9 137.2 FY 2009/10 1.6 1.9 2.1 1.7 7.3 144.5 FY 2010/11 1.6 1.5 2.1 1.2 6.4 150.9 FY 2011/12 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.6 4.1 155.1 FY 2012/13 5.0 160.0 _____________________________________________________________________ FY 2012/13 2.8 3.5 6.8 3.4 16.5 (PS2+PS3)
![]()
More than 160,000,000 units sold worldwide since 2000
160,636,885 units poroduced
![]()
Business Data & Sales
View PlayStation sales data, revenue insights, and key business metrics from Sony Interactive Entertainment.sonyinteractive.com
![]()
2000 PlayStation 2 - PSP PlayStation Portable | PlayStation History timeline
The 30 years of PlayStation timeline continues with the launch of PlayStation 2, and later with PSP PlayStation Portable.www.playstation.com
There's no way to know that, because they never clarified that…Thats the issue. A nintendo give updates on sales numbers in every financial.
The DS didn't reach 154M in 2016.
2014Clarify what? Those numbers are distinct. PS2 sold is PS2 sold. PS3 sold is PS3 sold. Misrepresenting those numbers would be highly illegal. You are trying to create an issue where there is none.
When then?
2014
It was 9.5 last year and it was their oeak quarter i think? Maybe im wrong lol.They must've sold more than 7M, they've been outperforming every quarter so far compared to FY2024, and iirc they managed upwards of to 10M(!) in Q3 2024.
I'm expecting an impressive showing.
Seems to be the holiday quarter. Only found the Q1 table for now, but they did 3.9M in Q2 iirc.It was 9.5 last year and it was their oeak quarter i think? Maybe im wrong lol.
Unlikely unless Europe did some very heavy liftingThey must've sold more than 7M, they've been outperforming every quarter so far compared to FY2024, and iirc they managed upwards of to 10M(!) in Q3 2024.
I'm expecting an impressive showing.
It's subjective I guess but I think 8M would be impressive.Unlikely unless Europe did some very heavy lifting
US did ~1 mio less in Nov-Dec'25 compared to 24
I would expect quarter sales 7-8mio for PS
Seems to be the holiday quarter. Only found the Q1 table for now, but they did 3.9M in Q2 iirc.
![]()
I'd expect less than 9.5M of course, but more than 7M seems very likely imo.
Oh wow, maybe I'm too optimistic.Its very unlikely due to US numbers, I expect around 5.6m myself.
You are allowed to question many things on here, but not the revised PS2 total lol...
Which region sold the most SW2 's?Japan made up 25% of Switch 1 sales yet for Switch 2 in Q3 it outsold every other region with 35% of sales. The trend for Switch 2 is different.
It makes sense when you realize that Switch 2 sells for $340USD in Japan and $450USD+ everywhere else...
Official like mixing PS3 and PS2 sales in the PS3 era… Blame Sony for make some people doubt.Not when it's from Sony itself you don't. We're not debating vgchartz or alinea analytics. I'm not sure what the issue is here?? Anyway no point discussing it because it's official. Going all conspiracy about it won't change that.
AmericasWhich region sold the most SW2 's?
While I agree with you, you need to remember this was 2013, where people were about to buy a PS4 and the PS3 was pretty cheap. So the "full year" of PS2 sales in 2013 wouldn't be that high. And they did a lot of creative accounting back then, disclosing production numbers first before switching to shipping numbers, and then gathering PS2 and PS3 sales to hide the bad PS3 sales early on. And production figure doesn't necesseraly means shipped units (as they certainly not shipped that last unit displayed in the museum).
But if Sony says 160 million, then it is. No need to discuss that.
Official like mixing PS3 and PS2 sales in the PS3 era… Blame Sony for make some people doubt.
Well you know now, so whats the problem? PS2 total is 160m. PS3 was 88m.
Oh wow, maybe I'm too optimistic.
I expect around 7.5M.Im taking into consideration the economic factors at play, people are simple cash deprived all over the world. Also PS5 has been performing badly in Japan, Europe and RotW cannot pick up the reduced NA/JP sales or get close to the impressive 9.5m figure of last year.
I hope I can be wrong though and Sony might achieve better performance, but in general I expect it less or around Switch's 7m figure.
That would actually be great — and honestly proof that Sony's strategy is a lot more robust and clever than people give them credit for. If they've managed to break into the Chinese market in any meaningful way, that's a huge strategic win, not some fluke.I expect around 7.5M.
Edit: China is a big factor for the PS5, could be more.