Where's the video link to the court trial where there was a hearing before a judge where Trump, his campaign, or Rudy got to present evidence, where the judge looked at the evidence and said it wasn't enough and sided with the accused? It never happened. So when did Trump have a chance to not be able to prove something in court? So we are moving from open discussion to dishonesty being considered the truth and censorship for everything else?
There's a difference between being careful and using the recent events as a pretext to shut down issues you don't agree with due to anti-Trump beliefs.
You even have the voting machine issue, which is separate from the Trump victory stuff, where we KNOW the CEO lied about the machine connectivity, that's going to be on the news in some form and talked about on social media for a long time, we can't talk about that? Where's the line?
What's even the cause for this reaction? Jan 6th? We going to pretend that there weren't BLM and Antifa protestors killing and burning people down MULTIPLE TIMES incited by sites, comments, and boards on the opposing side? Where were you then? Why is this different? Website provider threats? Monetary incentive? Twitch threatening to ban allowing this site to connect to it like it banned Trump? Otherwise I don't see a difference, I see hypocrisy. I also see the repeating of Twitter talking points by the site admin. All that's being done is giving REEE posters a new opening to come back and slowly take the form again, and then what? They smear you again? Do you bounce back twice? Doubtful.
Misinformation about 50+ Trump cases lost yet again, spread by liars who are calling for people disputing it grounds to label said people as conspiracy theorists. Irony to it's fullest.
I'm not like the other guys who disagree in this thread, to cowardly to admit what they are actually seeing and trying to find an excuse to justify it.
You say don't talk about the election because Trump lost when there are legitimate concerns? Fine, then you should also remove posts of people who agree that Hillary would have won without interference with Russia, a conspiracy theory you will likely allow.
A head-scratching decision. One that conveniently is non-transparent. I hope in the future anti-1stamendment neogaf site guy will change his mind, but right now i can not currently support this position. When, or if the 1ST Amendment matters again then I can support this position, if you can even call it one. Maybe one day I'll see 1STAmendment respected again, sooner than later and post again.
Good times CNNGaf, logging out.