Dance Inferno
Unconfirmed Member
y u bump dis n give me heart attack
y u bump dis n give me heart attack
Good news, everyone! WB was unsuccessful:
Feb. 06, 2015 EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
The status reverted back to "Application has been published for opposition" a couple of days ago, so all Night Dive has to do now is wait 30ish days.
Mmm I very much liked extraction point for Fear 1. Cut off a lot of fluff levels, added a chain gun and Holiday's death was the best part of the series.It's tradition. No matter how good Monolith games were, the expansion packs for them were always absymal
Please make it happen then avsp2 somehow.
Mmm I very much liked extraction point for Fear 1. Cut off a lot of fluff levels, added a chain gun and Holiday's death was the best part of the series.
Last week, Night Dive founder Stephen Kick and director of business development Larry Kuperman emailed me to let me know that while they had indeed planned to re-release No One Lives Forever and its sequel, they'd hit a wall and been forced to give up. Thanks to the ongoing inability and/or unwillingness of three publishersActivision, 20th Century Fox, and in particular Warner Bros.to determine who owned the game, Night Dive is currently abandoning its efforts to revive No One Lives Forever
Well, it sounds like it's mainly WB's fault here whereas for the other two it's kind of a pain in the neck to bother rooting out.Fuck all 3, they don't want to make the effort because they know they'll barely be paid.
Always remember, to most publishers it's money first, and gamers a distant second.
WB may just be too new and too fixated on establishing newer stuff that really paying attention to older stuff (or at least that which isn't cut and dry) is kind of a foreign concept to them.
Three pubs clinging to ownership of an IP that hasn't had an entry in 11 years (12 if you're only counting NOLF) and that they'll never use.
Shouldn't be shocked or surprised, I guess, but I can't see why Warner Bros didn't enter into a licensing deal with Night Dive as a relatively low-risk, low-investment dipping of the toes into the water with the NOLF brand.
Good stuff.
All these fucking console devs not understanding the PC market.
Sounds like they understand it just fine to me. They're just not interested in doing a lot of work for little payoff. I'd buy remasters of the NOLF games in a heartbeat but they're companies, not charities.
It's definitely Fox that owns the games, though... and I suspect WB feels the same way.
What, exactly, makes you feel you can say this with certainty?
20th Century Fox is the listed as the copyright claimant in the Copyright.gov database, not Fox Interactive, which rules out Acti, and only the trademarks for the subtitles to the sequels went with Monolith to WB as opposed to the trademark pertaining to the IP proper, which, in addition to what I just said, rules out WB. I suppose it's theoretically possible that Fox sold off the games at some point, but you'd expect there to be a record of that somewhere -- it's a legally-binding business transaction, not selling something at a garage sale.
Okay, let me rephrase that.
If it's as simple as you make it sound, Night Dive could just go talk to Fox, forget about WB entirely, and basically dare them to sue (since they'd need to actually dig up that ownership paperwork to even do so.)
That they don't do so suggests to me that it's not nearly that simple.
I had a feeling this was going to happen when it was said that there's news en route that people won't expect. It's definitely Fox that owns the games, though... and I suspect WB feels the same way. ND's CEO told me on Steam that talks with WB just suddenly stopped, which was followed by the opposition to the trademark filing; if I were a betting man I'd put my money on WB deliberately sabotaging ND's re-release efforts so it can chase the goose itself.
If Fox still owns the IP the dream lives on
long lost sister.
DO IT.
Well, as I said in my previous post, Fox doesn't believe it does own the games (or rather, I presume, it can't prove beyond reasonable doubt that it does), and with no trademark registration the entire IP essentially exists in limbo -- it's practically abandonware.
Even MORE of a reason to spin it off as an Archer game, spiritual successor that circumvents the tradmark limbo while still cashing in on the brand synergy.
WHY WON'T YOU LET ME DREAM
An Archer game definitely needs to happen, I agree.
ND did talk to Fox, actually. WB came into the picture as Fox is under the impression it doesn't own the games, presumably because it no longer has any paperwork to prove so beyond the listing in the Copyright.gov database.
Yes, I read the story. My point is that making any kind of handwavey statement about who "obviously" actually owns the rights is foolish given the information we have available.