Journey
Banned
Great analysis, I enjoyed his comments and overall conclusion.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7UngOXmgAP0
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7UngOXmgAP0
Too much Bloodborne talk tbh.
Any tag lines for those unable to watch the video?
"If you have a PS4 you should just buy Bloodborne."
Lol, good one! If you have a PS4 and you don't have Bloodborne yet, then you're doing it wrong![]()
No, he literally says that in the video conclusion. That was not sarcasm or a dig at DKS2.
I haven't really watched NXGamer's videos before, but I'm kind of baffled that people praise him as being less biased and more informative than Digital Foundry when he's excluding highly relevant information like frame-time in favor of a big 'ol framerate number.
There's also something wrong with his methodology if his Bloodborne footage is showing the game as just running above 30. If you show them as just framerate, they should manifest as the rate briefly zinging above 30 then dropping below it.
Missed that. Pretty silly thing to say in a performance analysis of a completely different game. Dark Souls 2 is definitely worth checking out even if you do play BB first.
I have seen this kind of comment before on his videos, what exactly is he "confirming" and for who exactly?People looked for someone to confirm their own views/hopes and found him.
Apparently, some of us like NXGamer's analysis because "he says what we like to hear". Based on the games NXGamer really focuses on, I think you know who "we" is referring to.I have seen this kind of comment before on his videos, what exactly is he "confirming" and for who exactly?
And the people who say that probably like Digital Foundry videos for that exact same reason.Apparently, some of us like NXGamer's analysis because "he says what we like to hear". Based on the games NXGamer really focuses on, I think you know who "we" is referring to.
Tip: His Uncharted 4 video was heavily criticized, although I have to admit there were a few inaccuracies.
Pretty much. Aside from John's articles on DF, most of the other articles contain too little information about graphical features and may sometimes come off as biased (Evolve DF Face Off, anyone?) and venture into next gen gameplay for no reason.And the people who say that probably like Digital Foundry videos for that exact same reason.
Back on topic though, I enjoy watching his videos as an alternative to Digital Foundry but for some reason I find his enthusiasm a little grating sometimes.
Can you read what you wrote and not cringe?People looked for someone to confirm their own views/hopes and found him.
i watched the video and noticed the ps4 version drop to 59.85 FPS while the xbone version maintains a crisp sleek 60 FPS. I'm unsure of which version to go with now :/
![]()
i watched the video and noticed the ps4 version drop to 59.85 FPS while the xbone version maintains a crisp sleek 60 FPS. I'm unsure of which version to go with now :/
![]()
i watched the video and noticed the ps4 version drop to 59.85 FPS while the xbone version maintains a crisp sleek 60 FPS. I'm unsure of which version to go with now :/
![]()
i watched the video and noticed the ps4 version drop to 59.85 FPS while the xbone version maintains a crisp sleek 60 FPS. I'm unsure of which version to go with now :/
![]()
I don't have the means to watch a video right this minute, which version is the best?
I don't have the means to watch a video right this minute, which version is the best?
I don't have the means to watch a video right this minute, which version is the best?
I don't have the means to watch a video right this minute, which version is the best?
Both Digital Foundry and NXGamer gave the nod to the PS4 version.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-dark-souls-2-performance-analysis
The PS4 version can have a 10+ fps advantage in some of the more demanding scenes. The XB1 version also has some significant frame drops into the lower 30's.
Too much Bloodborne talk tbh.
People looked for someone to confirm their own views/hopes and found him.
So Dark Souls 2 and Bloodborne share the same engine ?
I haven't really watched NXGamer's videos before, but I'm kind of baffled that people praise him as being less biased and more informative than Digital Foundry when he's excluding highly relevant information like frame-time in favor of a big 'ol framerate number.
There's also something wrong with his methodology if his Bloodborne footage is showing the game as just running above 30. If you show them as just framerate, they should manifest as the rate briefly zinging above 30 then dropping below it.
It's a fact. Edge just gave it 10/10 as well. I doubt I'll play a better game this year."If you have a PS4 you should just buy Bloodborne."
Putting it into context and to elaborate further, in DF's test run, they found 1 instance where the framerate dropped to 36fps, this was after a boss battle, didn't happen during the battle, but right after when a batch of floating souls appeared. An achievement also popped up at that point and it was assumened that the achievement caused the dip, but DF ran the test again during the same scene while already having the achievement, and the 2nd time it dropped again even without the achievement pop-up, thus confirming it was due to the batch of souls. DF quickly upadted their article with this finding.
From the video, just like NX Gamer's video, the game seems to run merily in the 50s and even 60 in open areas, but runs 50s most of the time with the heavier scenes like in the Forest of the Fallen Giants where a barrage of enemies caused the bone to drop down between the 40s - 50s. The PS4 is much more consistant and is able to maintain the 60fps a lot longer, but can also drop to as low as 48fps, and in the same scene of the Forest of Fallen Giants was doing 50s - 60s vs 40s - 50s means an avg. of 10fps better.
Just wanted to clarify that for anyone who can't watch the videos. DF is endeed much more thourough with their analysis finding scenes with these low dips whereas NX Gamer did not find any of these from what I can tell, but I still think it's useful to have someone else doing these for contrast, and I also enjoyed NXs commentary.
i watched the video and noticed the ps4 version drop to 59.85 FPS while the xbone version maintains a crisp sleek 60 FPS. I'm unsure of which version to go with now :/
![]()
Did they patch the game on both systems? because those results differ from Digital Foundry's. In fact, both DS2 and BB had different results for this guy. But he doesn't have a graph or anything more realtime to demonstrate the performance.
Demon's Souls, Dark Souls, Dark Souls II, and Bloodborne are all on Sony's Phyre engine. Bloodborne and Dark Souls II both seem to be forks of the version used for Dark Souls.