Yeah, it is what it is.
This wasn't necessarily directed at this post. Nothing wrong with the analysis at all and seems fair and on point. Its just the unfortunate byproduct of these things that suck.
No, but I agree with you. I think you're right. It's just one of those things that felt like there was no stopping, so I tried to embrace it and keep it as lighthearted as possible
If the developers know that it will integrate well, and they're pushing some really taxing rendering elsewhere, sure, use it, but as of now it shouldn't be a no brainer addition. I think DF also said there were at least 2 different implementations of VRS.
I think that was debunked. I can't keep up, lol.
Why they turn off the tunnel light on XSX ?
”Nobody” plays in 120fps mode though...
NXGamer
still says PS5 takes this round 
The mean average frame is higher on ps5 and has better texture and draw distance . That sounds like a win to me .”Nobody” plays in 120fps mode though...
It’s a much bigger thing that there are more fps stutters in the 60fps mode on PS5, the mode most of us actually use. While NX isn’t outright saying that PS5 version is broken like some grumpy PS5 owners said it’s clearly something Codemasters needs to look at, and NX is talking to them so maybe they’ll fix it. Framerate stutter in a racing game is obviously more noticeable than any other difference shown here so I’m not entirely sure why
Fair play to you for being honest, we need more people like you in these threads.
Ps5 still has the higher overall frame average so u need your vrr still
Ps5 still has the higher overall frame average so u need your vrr still
It has lower res texture and lower draw distance and worse ambient occlusion on xsx. Only u would believe it looks better on xsx despite the same video u r quoting mentions ps5 is superior in all aspects
Looks better in 60hz as well on Xbox. Remember all those people who were saying that once they update the settings bug on Xbox it would cost performance on 120hz mode? I should really go find their quotes
I think its obvious those crushed black areas are a bug of some kind. Both versions of the game appear to have tons of visual bugs between them.
Looks better in 60hz as well on Xbox with VRR.Remember all those people who were saying that once they update the settings bug on Xbox it would cost performance on 120hz mode? I should really go find their quotes
Have you seen the average framerate here ? Better ligthing (or is it AO?) + higher average fps on PS5.
Looks better in 60hz as well on Xbox with VRR.Remember all those people who were saying that once they update the settings bug on Xbox it would cost performance on 120hz mode? I should really go find their quotes
When u have lower resolution texture , lower draw distance , worse ambient occlusion and lower total average frame u know server blade has fucked up ur dreams
A full 20fps advantage, not bad for a server blade.
I think DF pointed that out about the PS5 version and said it can make the PS5 look better at times for it. Do you think NXgamer is mistaking it for better ambient occlusion ? Because I can't see better AO on PS5 only darker shadows.
Go ahead, but don't make me go back to the original video to prove the xbox version now drops frames a hell of a lot more in 120 mode, so much so ps5 now beats it where as before it never.
Looks better in 60hz as well on Xbox with VRR.Remember all those people who were saying that once they update the settings bug on Xbox it would cost performance on 120hz mode? I should really go find their quotes
Not really the other video done by elandebit also showed better AO in his video for ps5 vs xsx. So not just nxgamer
They said it or wrote in the case of one. They didn't point it out.
A full 20fps advantage, not bad for a server blade.
No it's just better ambient occlusion as mentioned by both elandebit and nxgamer. That's all ..sorry
What a shit post. Didn’t take too long.
This is why we need longer fps examples. He hasn't even reached the first corner and soon as he's clear of the cars PS5 jumps to 120 from 90 while SX is 110 plus when in the cars. All the other comparisons he's way ahead of the cars so its 120 easy.Average Frame rate:
XSX 118.78
PS5: 117.23
All those frames difference while having lesser graphical options, the server blade is paying off.
Only usually xbox fanboys who don't want to listen to facts and actual results but instead repeat their companies marketing slogans, so yes usually that sort.
It's the most disgusting feature being shouted from rooftop because of marketing
.imagine capping for a feature that makes the game look muddy and last genThis gen DF seem to be totally unreliable when comparing games (when they actually try to compare them). They are often missing things (usually when PS5 has the advantage) or simply not doing any proper analysis. After one whole year of declaring XSX winner by default simply du to 12 > 10, they seem to be completly confused with those results, even when both versions are virtually identical.
DF are not perfect and you've got allow them some human error. But I don't recall often DF pointing things out and not giving a example. NX does it quite regularly.
I dont know if its this bad or being used wrong, I just don't know.It's the most disgusting feature being shouted from rooftop because of marketing
I haven't seen in the comparison videos PS5 running worse. Not saying it doesn't but that's my point. They should do a full lap and stay in with the pack of cars.
And yet the averages are so close which tells you the xbox is dropping just as much overall so post cherry picked picture xbox taking a big l everywhere else.He just said at 3:43 in this very video it holds 120fps better than before
I've just shown you a screen where the PS5 version drops almost THIRTY frames with no VRR support that's a going to be game breaking stutter and judder.
I dont know if its this bad or being used wrong, I just don't know.
Also we dont know if the ps5 is even using it doesn't appear so, although they apparently use is as part of the geometry engine earlier in the pipeline. Imagine of ps5 isn't even getting a gain from it yet, how fast could it run with it, not that you'd want to if the results are so bad.
But its just amazing that xbox seem to be using it and no evidence of ps5 using it and yet youd expect a big performance gain for xbox, yet its only just similar at lower res and texture detail etc.
A quick and dirty Google search I got this...
''It's not just integrated graphics that stand to benefit from VRS, though. We also ran the test on a handful of discrete GPUs. Shown above is our benchmark run with a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti installed into a testbed alongside AMD's Ryzen 9 3900X CPU. As you can see, flipping the VRS toggle netted us a greater than 46 percent performance gain.
To rule out this being a possible outlier, we ran the same test on two other graphics cards, those being the GeForce RTX 2080 and GeForce RTX 2060 Super. Here are the numbers from each one (with the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti plotted as well)...
And no, it was not an outlier. Our GeForce RTX 2080 test run netted the biggest performance gain of all at 52.9 percent, while the GeForce RTX 2060 Super was not all that far behind at 49.5 percent."
3DMark Variable Rate Shading Test Shows Big Performance Gains On NVIDIA, Intel GPUs, AMD Won't Run
A new variable rate shading test is available in 3DMark and it is showing big performance gains on supported GPUs.amp.hothardware.com
If those percentages are accurate such a boost should be putting xbox into the lead rather obviously no? But yet its not.
Riky
is the only person on GAF that does not understand what an average is and likes to screenshot any dip in his favour and ignor dips that are against his fixed position. But dont forget, Riky has a VRR TV, didnt you know ? Yes its comical.
