Off-site Community Discussion (Reset, etc.) -- READ OP. Stay civil. Don't make it personal. Keep it in here.

JORMBO

Darkness no more
Mar 5, 2009
5,222
1,407
900
If Battlefield V fails to reach its sales target by a large margin because the developers only listen to ResetERA and far-leftists for feedback, I wonder if other developers will take notice and slowly walk away from that echo chamber masquerading as a forum.
Seems like they are just doubling down on it. I don’t think it will hit a lot of them until EA sees the bad sales and possibly makes cuts to the studio.
 
Feb 2, 2009
7,965
728
700
Just skimming through the (astonishingly passive aggressively named) "We should give people like Milo a platform, Says Jaffe; not doing so is ruining the country. Defends himself with NPC memes." thread on Reee really drives home to me why I despise these assclowns so thoroughly.

Its amazing to me how arguments for classically liberal positions like the right to, and value of, free speech to society is seen as something dangerous by these idiots.

It should be astonishingly self-evident why this is a fundamental truth, and I have zero interest in explaining why silencing voices out of squeamishness or political expediency is a really terrible idea. Because if you don't "get it", you're an imbecile and not worth the effort.
 
Apr 25, 2009
5,260
4,625
700
Australia
Seems like they are just doubling down on it. I don’t think it will hit a lot of them until EA sees the bad sales and possibly makes cuts to the studio.
I believe that we are in the death throes of this ideologically-driven corporate hijacking with corporations ready to kick it to the curb as they realise how badly courting these ideologues has hurt their profitability. Viva la capitalism.
 
Mar 26, 2015
730
88
265
Brazil
What is it with you and "white knighting"? You sound very childish.



Last time I checked, the thread title clearly states "Don't make it personal" which you clearly seem to fail at. Someones marital status got absolutely nothing to do with the topic of this thread and the fact that you even try to make it a talking point by mentioning it as a counter argument is a patehthic and sad move on your part.
I noticed this as well, i believe this is the second time someone make a personal insult toward Nobody important, ,my opnion is that the mods should be more decisive in warning against personal attacks like that. If you disagree with his opnions, just confront his arguments or dont discuss with him at all.

The DICE developer posted on ERA saying they don’t get the BFV backlash. Someone explains it and gets banned right away. I don’t think DICE is going to learn much hanging out in that safe space.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/di...goes-up-in-flames.84698/page-12#post-15630842
Wow he did nothing wrong, this is one of the most absurd bans i saw.

I kinda agree with the people who are complaing about historical innacuracy, if DICE is advertising the game as a genuine world war 2 game based on actual history, they should not create things that never happened just for the sake of some artificial inclusion.
 
Apr 25, 2009
5,260
4,625
700
Australia
I noticed this as well, i believe this is the second time someone make a personal insult toward Nobody important, ,my opnion is that the mods should be more decisive in warning against personal attacks like that. If you disagree with his opnions, just confront his arguments or dont discuss with him at all.



Wow he did nothing wrong, this is one of the most absurd bans i saw.

I kinda agree with the people who are complaing about historical innacuracy, if DICE is advertising the game as a genuine world war 2 game based on actual history, they should not create things that never happened just for the sake of some artificial inclusion.
I said he was white knighting because I believe that's exactly what he's doing. I believe that because there is a pattern of him constantly jumping to the woman's defense by default, irrespective of evidence. This is behaviour that should be discouraged because it is inherently judging an allegation based on the immutable characteristics of the accuser/accused, and we all know where that leads. You will need to expand on how that is a "personal attack" necessitating moderator intervention because, in my view, I am criticising the behaviour, not the person.

I also suggest you drop the passive aggression and @ me if you want to discuss something I have done in order to give me the right of reply.
 
Mar 26, 2015
730
88
265
Brazil
I said he was white knighting because I believe that's exactly what he's doing. I believe that because there is a pattern of him constantly jumping to the woman's defense by default, irrespective of evidence. This is behaviour that should be discouraged because it is inherently judging an allegation based on the immutable characteristics of the accuser/accused, and we all know where that leads. You will need to expand on how that is a "personal attack" necessitating moderator intervention because, in my view, I am criticising the behaviour, not the person.

I also suggest you drop the passive aggression and @ me if you want to discuss something I have done in order to give me the right of reply.
I was not mentioning you at all though. I was talking about the guy who said something about his marital status and the other who actually received a warning precisely for personal attack.
 
Last edited:
Likes: matt404au
Apr 25, 2009
5,260
4,625
700
Australia
I was not mentioning you at all though. I was talking about the guy who said something about his marital status and the other who actually received a warning precisely for personal attack.
Ok, fair enough. The post you quoted from @fantomena referenced my use of the term "white knighting" in response to @Nobody_Important's behaviour so I thought you were referring to that.
 

JordanN

Junior Member
Apr 21, 2012
15,890
1,288
470
Brampton, Ontario
Pewdiepie is now a Nazi.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/wapo-pewdiepie-is-youtube’s-most-subscribed-channel-he’s-about-to-be-dethroned.77246/page-2#post-15602597


Also, Reset assholes are still angry at Neogaf. Once again, anyone who still believes this thread doesn't drive Resetera insane, well, I don't know what to tell you.

People keep coming in to this thread to tell me "JordanN stop! Resetera is perfect! They're always improving and don't deserve to be shamed and such" Errrrrr. Wrong.

I keep posting their hypocrisy and racism, it only inflames them more. They do care that this thread exists and they're outraged their lies are getting exposed.




They want to live in a world where no one talks about their racist moderators. I'm making sure that is not the case. If it pisses them off, too bad. That's not my problem.
 
Last edited:
Likes: Freeman76
Sep 7, 2015
787
195
285
Munich, Germany
Pewdiepie is now a Nazi.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/wapo-pewdiepie-is-youtube’s-most-subscribed-channel-he’s-about-to-be-dethroned.77246/page-2#post-15602597


Also, Reset assholes are still angry at Neogaf. Once again, anyone who still believes this thread doesn't drive Resetera insane, well, I don't know what to tell you.

People keep coming in to this thread to tell me "JordanN stop! Resetera is perfect! They're always improving and don't deserve to be shamed and such" Errrrrr. Wrong.

I keep posting their hypocrisy and racism, it only inflames them more. They do care that this thread exists and they're outraged their lies are getting exposed.




They want to live in a world where no one talks about their racist moderators. I'm making sure that is not the case. If it pisses them off, too bad. That's not my problem.

These people are out of their minds. I'm glad they are gone from NeoGaf. Just read through 2 pages of the thread and it's bad...like really bad. never facepalmed so hard in my life
 

JordanN

Junior Member
Apr 21, 2012
15,890
1,288
470
Brampton, Ontario
Taken from the Beto O'Rourke 2020 thread.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/wa...ut-running-in-2020.85123/page-6#post-15665004



Well if that isn't one of the most terrifying things you could ever read.

Any Democrat who doesn't bow down to identity politics is fucked.

2020 will once again be the battle for common sense but stupid (Trump) vs SJW and open borders (the Democrats).

Good god, I really hope Trump pulls through in the upcoming years. If he loses, America is finished.

Also, look at what this tool has to say:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/wa...to-about-running-in-2020.85123/#post-15653091


Ah yes, when I think U.S presidents I think... Spanish? Wtf?

How are Americans not seeing what is going on with their country?
 
Last edited:
Feb 2, 2009
7,965
728
700
The last time I saw thinking like that was coming from religious-right proponents of censorship. The sort who'd go "think of the children", and claim things were obscene of course stressing that they hadn't seen said obscenity personally, because doing so would corrupt them and they must remain above it all.
 
Likes: matt404au

Redneckerz

Those long posts don't cover that red neck boy
Jun 25, 2018
1,784
1,418
375
Unknown Body, Proxima Centauri, 4th O.B.
Pewdiepie is now a Nazi.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/wapo-pewdiepie-is-youtube’s-most-subscribed-channel-he’s-about-to-be-dethroned.77246/page-2#post-15602597


Also, Reset assholes are still angry at Neogaf. Once again, anyone who still believes this thread doesn't drive Resetera insane, well, I don't know what to tell you.

People keep coming in to this thread to tell me "JordanN stop! Resetera is perfect! They're always improving and don't deserve to be shamed and such" Errrrrr. Wrong.

I keep posting their hypocrisy and racism, it only inflames them more. They do care that this thread exists and they're outraged their lies are getting exposed.




They want to live in a world where no one talks about their racist moderators. I'm making sure that is not the case. If it pisses them off, too bad. That's not my problem.
I don't think Louis suicided because of ERA, atleast i don't recall that.

Other than that: I went through some of those Pewdienazi posts and all they seem to reference are things from a year ago. One even said that he didn't learn... except he did.

He also did a charity stream yesterday - Surprisingly that isn't picked up by them.

Unironically this behavior was addressed by Felix himself but more broad targetting the media: They only focus on the absolute negatives, all the positive things he has done (Helping other channels out, JohnnyDee, the Voiceover guy, etc) is always ignored. He also does book reviews, never heard a jack from that aswell.

Admittely, Pew is making fun out of some of his outrage a tad too much imo, still making references to his n-word bridge moment and so on. At some point, i wish he moved on. But other than that, Pew is far from a nazi.
 
Apr 27, 2015
4,309
50
300
Essex, UK
David Jaffe goes after Resetera. :unsure:



REEEEEset's reaction. :LOL:

https://www.resetera.com/threads/da...f-war-has-a-bone-to-pick-with-resetera.85351/

And check it, Neogaf's public credibility continues to grow.

Haha I saw this, and the other thread that started it all. Funny all these plebs rush to Phantom Thiefs defense, when the guy is a grade A pillock and basically talks shit in every thread he is present in. I didnt think any Forum would ever outclass Godlike Productions in terms of craziness, but Era has done it with ease.
 
May 4, 2005
11,493
691
1,240
31
Germany
www.gaming-universe.de
REEEsetera reacts to Facebook prohibiting sex talk

https://www.resetera.com/threads/fa...ple-back-into-the-closet.85330/#post-15680204

Remember, these are the same schmucks who were sucking Sony's cock for censoring lewd games. Now when the shoe is on the other foot, all they can do is REEEEEE!!
Facebook is pretty hilarious there... content that "we draw the line (...) when content (...) encourages (...) sexual encounters between adults". Maybe I should try posting. "We need more children to sustain the German retirement system". "Content such as (...) mentioning (...) breasts, groin or buttocks" - what the fuck? Now I cannot call those asses dicks anymore because they might feel some pain in their breast since they are so bound up with their fear of sexual intercourse?
 
Apr 25, 2009
5,260
4,625
700
Australia
Facebook is pretty hilarious there... content that "we draw the line (...) when content (...) encourages (...) sexual encounters between adults". Maybe I should try posting. "We need more children to sustain the German retirement system". "Content such as (...) mentioning (...) breasts, groin or buttocks" - what the fuck? Now I cannot call those asses dicks anymore because they might feel some pain in their breast since they are so bound up with their fear of sexual intercourse?
I wonder if this would still be allowed:

 
Oct 2, 2018
97
228
175
My troll sense is tingling with that guy
Yeah. Definitely.

I can guarantee you that there are a good few accounts on there that seem like sincere posters, who actually believe their own crazy stuff, that are basically trolls doing a parody account.

Any forum that has is clearly taking a "side" on various issues will be infested with people pretending to be on that side and pushing the crazy to new heights.

You guys have heard of the "Grievance Studies" hoax that was exposed earlier this year?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_Studies_affair

ResetEra DEFINITELY has multiple posters, probably with relatively high post counts, doing similar on their site.

I am sure that they have managed to bring a few gullible fools along for the ride by creating an atmosphere that you can find favor on the site by pushing certain ideas.

If you think Jordan Peterson is a literal Nazi or a Neo-Nazi or anything like that then you are out of your goddamned mind.
I don't like the guy myself but I see no value at all in desperately trying to convince others that he's actually something that he clearly is not.

If you think Pewdiepie is a Nazi because he read Petersons book, or likes Petersons book or whatever then you are even more far gone. Or maybe just a troll.
Again, Pewdiepies content isn't really for me but I don't get the need to convince others that he's a secret Nazi or whatever.

What is it with these folks and their obsession with Incels and Nazis?
Why is it so important for them to convince me or you or whoever that certain people are Incels and Nazis?
 

JordanN

Junior Member
Apr 21, 2012
15,890
1,288
470
Brampton, Ontario
Last edited:

JordanN

Junior Member
Apr 21, 2012
15,890
1,288
470
Brampton, Ontario
Sorry for double posting but I feel this deserves it's own spotlight:

https://www.resetera.com/threads/da...ick-with-resetera.85351/page-20#post-15689616


This is what commie SJW's believes.

First they said reading books make you a Nazi. Now Nazis don't have to do anything to still be called "violent".

They're at complete war with free speech. They will label you a Nazi, and then say you're violent for just existing.
 
Apr 8, 2006
67,954
281
1,310
Toronto
Sorry for double posting but I feel this deserves it's own spotlight:

https://www.resetera.com/threads/da...ick-with-resetera.85351/page-20#post-15689616


This is what commie SJW's believes.

First they said reading books make you a Nazi. Now Nazis don't have to do anything to still be called "violent".

They're at complete war with free speech. They will label you a Nazi, and then say you're violent for just existing.
I don't know. I sort of agree with that sentiment. If we're talking about actual Nazis and white supremacists their entire ideology is based around suppressing certain groups, be it religious or racial, into not having a voice. Their entire movement is to harm the rights of other groups. I can see that as being considered a type of violence, even if it's not in the literal sense.

The problem is that members of the far left seem to have a very broad definition of what a nazi is.

If we're talking about actual Nazis, I would gladly punch them in the face. No fucks given.
 

JordanN

Junior Member
Apr 21, 2012
15,890
1,288
470
Brampton, Ontario
I don't know. I sort of agree with that sentiment. If we're talking about actual Nazis and white supremacists their entire ideology is based around suppressing certain groups, be it religious or racial, into not having a voice. Their entire movement is to harm the rights of other groups. I can see that as being considered a type of violence, even if it's not in the literal sense.

The problem is that members of the far left seem to have a very broad definition of what a nazi is.

If we're talking about actual Nazis, I would gladly punch them in the face. No fucks given.
No you wont, or you're going to jail.

Also, do you punch religious people because their holy books also oppress people?
 
Last edited:
Apr 8, 2006
67,954
281
1,310
Toronto
No you wont, or you're going to jail.

Also, do you punch religious people because their holy books also oppress people?
Yes I would and then face the music. I'm not saying it's not against the law, I'm saying it's worth it.

As for religious people it depends on how active they are in the act of oppression.
 
Last edited:

JordanN

Junior Member
Apr 21, 2012
15,890
1,288
470
Brampton, Ontario
Yes I would and then face the music. I'm not saying it's not against the law, I'm saying it's worth it.

As for religious people it depends on how active they are in the act of oppression.
Punching people who have committed no crime is cowardly.

Every human on earth could be plotting to blow up a building or commit a terrorist act. Just blaming one group is hypocritical. You have to hold all humans accountable.
Anything else is literally thought policing.
 
Last edited:
Apr 8, 2006
67,954
281
1,310
Toronto
Punching people who have committed no crime is cowardly.

Every human on earth could be plotting to blow up a building or commit a terrorist act. Just blaming one group is hypocritical. You have to hold all humans accountable.
Representing actual Nazisim is endorsing crimes against humanity. I consider their endorsement of such crimes weak and cowardly.
 

JordanN

Junior Member
Apr 21, 2012
15,890
1,288
470
Brampton, Ontario
Representing actual Nazisim is endorsing crimes against humanity. I consider their endorsement of such crimes weak and cowardly.
So you want to censor human brains and the way people think?
Why do you care what people endorse? Once again, unless there is an actual violent crime being committed, you are assaulting people for just thinking. That is stupid.

The beauty of free speech is you're free to debate these ideas. Otherwise, straight up banning free thought and physically harming people for having opinions is ironically, totalitarian and tyranny like.
 
Last edited:
Sep 4, 2018
104
80
170
I don't know. I sort of agree with that sentiment. If we're talking about actual Nazis and white supremacists their entire ideology is based around suppressing certain groups, be it religious or racial, into not having a voice. Their entire movement is to harm the rights of other groups. I can see that as being considered a type of violence, even if it's not in the literal sense.

The problem is that members of the far left seem to have a very broad definition of what a nazi is.

If we're talking about actual Nazis, I would gladly punch them in the face. No fucks given.
You took the words right out of my mouth.

Thats precisely it. I dont think any civilized person today would ever think of liking and supporting a Nazi, let alone be one. But the insistence on labeling a person as a nazi / racist just as easy as one changes underwear is one of the principal motives of this awful political drama we have today, wich seems to be 'destroying' human interaction even on the most basic levels and thats crazy.
 
Apr 8, 2006
67,954
281
1,310
Toronto
So you want to censor human brains and the way people think?
Why do you care what people endorse? Once again, unless there is an actual violent crime being committed, you are assaulting people for just thinking. That is stupid.
They can think all they want.

If they are actively displaying the swastika on their sleeve and endorsing Nazisim in a public forum I consider that a danger to the rights and freedoms of many people in our community.
 

JordanN

Junior Member
Apr 21, 2012
15,890
1,288
470
Brampton, Ontario
They can think all they want.

If they are actively displaying the swastika on their sleeve and endorsing Nazisim in a public forum I consider that a danger to the rights and freedoms of many people in our community.
What danger?

Your argument is the same as people who say violent video games makes serial killers.

It doesn't matter how much you find a symbol offensive. Show the evidence that the symbol is going to grow legs and start threatening people.

Again, if I see religious people walking around, do I start beating them up because of what the bible or quran says? Only in tyrannical societies do people attack other people over words.

Instead, WHY DON'T YOU DEBATE THEIR BELIEFS INSTEAD OF VIOLENTLY ASSERTING YOURSELF OVER THEM?
 
Last edited:
Apr 8, 2006
67,954
281
1,310
Toronto
What danger?

Your argument is the same as people who say violent video games makes serial killers.

It doesn't matter how much you find a symbol offensive. Show the evidence that the symbol is going to grow legs and start threatening people.

Again, if I see religious people walking around, do I start beating them up because of what the bible or quran says? Only in tyrannical societies do people attack other people over words.
The very symbol represents genocide. People endorsing it are either willfully ignorant of that fact or happy to associate themselves with it. Nazisim is a threat by its very existence and should be extinguished.