In one paragraph, he says that Nintendo won't make money because developers don't see a reason to develop for the Wii U because Wii U sales are not 'a lot'. Then, in the next paragraph, he says Nintendo won't make money because hardware sales for the 3DS, *while ***higher*** than the DS at the same point in its life*, don't yield a profit for Nintendo yet.
So, are you saying developers don't see a reason to develop for the 3DS? Or are you saying the Wii U doesn't yield a profit for every unit it sells? Either way, I see profits in the long run.
Pachter, I don't get you.