Vyse The Legend
Member
The Jeff tributes sound like a gross afterthought and just another way to damage control the situation by playing "nice".
Do you work for CNET or something?PkunkFury said:well that about settles it. The official word is in and it looks like things aren't exactly how the rumors portrayed them to be. This is why you shouldn't jump to conclusions folks. It's a good thing we got soem first hand information. Time to pack this thread up.
Zeed said:Do you work for CNET or something?
nestea said:This is what Cnet has been saying all along. They didn't fire Jeff due to advertiser tension, they did so because of the "tone" of his reviews which we heard already and we've already concluded that is BS.
This "news" doesn't help clear up anything, just reaffirming what Cnet has been spouting all along.
PkunkFury said:yes, but this is first hand information. Up until now everything has been from "sources" and "insiders" that aren't willing to divulge their identity. Up until this point, the whole 70 page thread has been fueled by misinformation
PkunkFury said:well that about settles it. The official word is in and it looks like things aren't exactly how the rumors portrayed them to be. This is why you shouldn't jump to conclusions folks. It's a good thing we got soem first hand information. Time to pack this thread up. Also, it's nice to see they're going to give Jeff decent send off after all of the trouble this has caused.
PkunkFury said:yes, but this is first hand information. Up until now everything has been from "sources" and "insiders" that aren't willing to divulge their identity. Up until this point, the whole 70 page thread has been fueled by misinformation
PkunkFury said:yes, but this is first hand information. Up until now everything has been from "sources" and "insiders" that aren't willing to divulge their identity. Up until this point, the whole 70 page thread has been fueled by misinformation
Vennt said:Read this blog, and follow it chronologically through the various staff & industry type blogs and you'll see the "big picture" - they are not calling this a black day for Jeff, but a black day for gaming journalism.
If you can't follow on and have to wait for "official statements" I suggest you stick to simpler concepts & topics
PkunkFury said:yes, but this is first hand information. Up until now everything has been from "sources" and "insiders" that aren't willing to divulge their identity. Up until this point, the whole 70 page thread has been fueled by misinformation
PkunkFury said:yes, but this is first hand information. Up until now everything has been from "sources" and "insiders" that aren't willing to divulge their identity. Up until this point, the whole 70 page thread has been fueled by misinformation
PkunkFury said:yes, but this is first hand information. Up until now everything has been from "sources" and "insiders" that aren't willing to divulge their identity. Up until this point, the whole 70 page thread has been fueled by misinformation
PkunkFury said:yes, but this is first hand information. Up until now everything has been from "sources" and "insiders" that aren't willing to divulge their identity. Up until this point, the whole 70 page thread has been fueled by misinformation
PkunkFury said:yes, but this is first hand information. Up until now everything has been from "sources" and "insiders" that aren't willing to divulge their identity. Up until this point, the whole 70 page thread has been fueled by misinformation
Could be, but I'd put money more on new management and a desire to have more advertiser friendly content then anything.El-Suave said:Maybe we can all agree on the fact that if you're a prominent figure in any endeavor for over 10 years, you undoubtedly will have made some enemies. Unfortunately for Jeff at least one of them was in a position to fire him. I doubt the K&L fiasco was the lone reason but probably just the proverbial final nail in the coffin.
chespace said:Looks like everybody was wrong and there was absolutely no shadiness involved here at all.
Okay, back to your regularly scheduled system wars.
Gamespot is a-ok once again.
Hmm, I feel like eating some McGriddles suddenly.
Seriously.kylej said:that Ryan quote reads like he had a gun to his head when he wrote it
That was written by a PR flack. "Core mission"? Man, come on. They're not even trying for sincerity!Ryan MacDonald said:Though he will be missed by his colleagues, Jeff's leaving does not affect GameSpot's core mission of delivering the most timely news, video content, in-depth previews, and unbiased reviews in games journalism. GameSpot is an institution, and its code of ethics and duty to its users remains unchanged.
TheWolf said:heh, so they decided to part ways, but he got locked out of his office? :lol
Mar_ said:That crappy PR spin just makes Gamespot lose more cred. I mean seriously. If they are just going to attempt to gloss over this whole thing and act like everything is fine and dandy, then I hope the site has a horrible painful death.
:lol That article was such bullshit.PkunkFury said:well that about settles it. The official word is in and it looks like things aren't exactly how the rumors portrayed them to be. This is why you shouldn't jump to conclusions folks. It's a good thing we got soem first hand information. Time to pack this thread up. Also, it's nice to see they're going to give Jeff decent send off after all of the trouble this has caused.
Yeah right."The accusations in the media that it has done so are unsubstantiated and untrue. Jeff's departure stemmed from internal reasons unrelated to any buyer of advertising on GameSpot."
PkunkFury said:well that about settles it. The official word is in and it looks like things aren't exactly how the rumors portrayed them to be. This is why you shouldn't jump to conclusions folks. It's a good thing we got soem first hand information. Time to pack this thread up. Also, it's nice to see they're going to give Jeff decent send off after all of the trouble this has caused.
I believe EGM records on Thursday or Friday of the previous week, so they either didn't have much(anything?) to go on or probably decided they didn't know enough to comment.starnix17 said:New EGM Live is up, but it doesn't seem like they mention it. I'll skim through it more.
nightowl said:I believe EGM records on Thursday or Friday of the previous week, so they either didn't have much(anything?) to go on or probably decided they didn't know enough to comment.
Maybe I said it wrong but that's what I meant about EGM recording.FartOfWar said:This is likely but then EGM also records throughout the week, which means that today's show was taped last week. We'll dive into it on tomorrow's GFW, but focus on the state of the industry and the way that mags, websites, publishers, and developers interact. We know no more about the specifics of this incident than you, however, and won't speculate there.
Here's the intro: http://www.gamevideos.com/video/id/16479
or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rr1mRG1giM
Note that it is not intended as serious commentary, and is a satirical take on the state of the "blogosphere".
The exchange on this issue with the Stick that is Joyful was very bizzare:TheWolf said:i guess the video review removal was just a coincidence.
If it was tone/quality of his work, why not just say that the work that was removed from the site failed to meet GameSpot's quality standards, blah blah blah?While we had Cain on the line, we also asked her about the odd disappearance of Gerstmann's video review of the game from the GameSpot site. She responded by pointing out a note at the bottom of the still-running text review for the game, which states that "this review has been updated to include differences between the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions and a clarification on the game's multiplayer mode."
When pressed for clarification, Cain said that this note applied to the video review as well. "At the bottom of the post of the [text] review we made a note that we have updated the review, and we made those decisions based on our own editorial standards," she said. "It was our decision to take down the [video] review." Given this justification, we can't help but wonder why GameSpot couldn't just edit the video review, as they did the text version. Why remove the entire thing if the problem was really just a "clarification?" When asked just that question, Cain reiterated her initial statement.
Petrae said:This is sarcasm... right?
Believe what you will, but my take is that CNET is forcing GameSpot to spin damage control and make Jeff out to look like a good guy who simply parted ways. That doesn't compute if you read the reactions of his fellow GS colleagues.
Giving him a hero's sendoff after royally screwing him doesn't make the wound sting any less, and you can bet that these "tributes" will be more sterile than a man with a vasectomy.
Kabuki Waq said:If they lie about the reasons for the firing can Jeff Respond then? i mean if they lie he has the right to respond gag order or no gag order right?
ParticleReality said:Hey guys, I saw a K&L ad on gametrailers once. Can we ban them too?
AniHawk said:Do you need this bullet-pointed for you?
Lost Fragment said:
Lost Fragment said:
Shamrock said:
Fixed
:lol The guy has 1 signature in his petition.
ParticleReality said:No. This banning thing is still getting fucking stupid. Didn't penny arcade have a Hellgate ad up on their site even when they claimed they only let GOOD games get ad space on their sites? We should ban them too.