• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
  • The Politics forum has been nuked. Please do not bring political discussion to the rest of the site, or you will be removed. Thanks.

Petition for Penis [ProTip: NO]

Status
Not open for further replies.

DopeyFish

Not bitter, just unsweetened
Jun 6, 2004
37,148
1
1,615
Why not anagrams of epic tales of penis?

Sloppiest Fiancee works well with the persona
 

gutshot

Member
Dec 20, 2007
14,201
0
0
North Carolina


This is getting interesting.

GAF Detectives: 1
Manics/greekboy/ForzaItalia/Epic Tales of Penis: 0
 

Parallax

best seen in the classic "Shadow of the Beast"
Sep 11, 2005
31,445
1
1,255
35
los angeles
I appreciate Mandrake's work, this thread is too cluttered with bullshit to really get my drama fix. Shut the fuck up if you are not contributing, this includes me and this post. Goes back to plotting the finer points of this...

what exactly are you talking about
 

Opiate

Member
Dec 4, 2007
22,801
0
0
Saint Louis / New York City
I don't know who this person is but I'm pretty sure that all high-traffic forums have a zero-tolerance policy for alts.

NeoGAF Terms of Service, Article 1A:

Each accepted member is granted one, and only one, username. If you are caught using multiple usernames, you will be subject to immediate and permanent banning of all accounts involved.

It's not a hidden rule. It's the very first paragraph of the very first article of the ToS which has been available and sticked for years. Even if this poster had done nothing else, this warrants permanent banning. Of course, he did do something else. Many times over, in fact.
 

bengraven

Member
Nov 28, 2005
40,935
15
1,445
42
Holy shit @ that Manics post.

What the fuck...

I quickly went to the last page to see if you had posted one of these.

Truly indispensable.

hahhaa, same here. I saw another two pages since I last checked and was like "I hope Mandrake posted".



Edit: WAIT. Epic Tales is FORZA?!

 

OrangeYouGlad

Banned
May 9, 2009
4,182
0
0
was he banned over that 39 and 19 years old thread?

to be honest if they would un ban him, why would they keep all others banned.

who is he to get an exception?

Nobody, that's why bish pretty much made it clear this won't do much to help him.
 

Harry Potter

Banned
Feb 20, 2010
6,263
0
0
was he banned over that 39 and 19 years old thread?

to be honest if they would un ban him, why would they keep all others banned.

who is he to get an exception?





wait what i never seen this before.

which harry potter is this? chamber of secrets?

POA
 

Parallax

best seen in the classic "Shadow of the Beast"
Sep 11, 2005
31,445
1
1,255
35
los angeles
I like how her legs twitch out.

And yes, I'm assuming it's a "her" because the other one is obviously leaning into her. Teen sex DID happen at Hogwarts.

im not doubting that. i bet when the tri-wizard cup was happening, they were getting it on like rabbits
 
Sep 15, 2010
7,577
1
0
twitter.com
NeoGAF Terms of Service, Article 1A:

It's not a hidden rule. It's the very first paragraph of the very first article of the ToS which has been available and sticked for years. Even if this poster had done nothing else, this warrants permanent banning. Of course, he did do something else. Many times over, in fact.

Alt = having two accounts at the same time, right? When you get permabanned and after some time manage to create another account (different one) is this an alt as well?
 

Opiate

Member
Dec 4, 2007
22,801
0
0
Saint Louis / New York City
We do not typically discuss moderation in any form (GAF is not moderated by committee) but I want to step forward for a moment to make one particular thing clear.

I was the moderator who banned this user, and I did so having never heard of him before. I do not have any interest in hockey (or almost any sport), so any threads he frequents are not those I frequent. Here is the exact order in which the events occured:

1) This poster (who already has a name that raises hackles, but is not itself worthy of any sort of moderation), made a thread which is already posted here -- he explained how he was dating a 19 year old girl and was thinking of "putting a baby in it" because her family was wealthy and he could presumably leech money from them. It was very inappropriate.

2) I then began searching the poster's history, and saw several equally horrid threads; contradictory tales which indicated he was vastly different ages, genders, and of hugely different personalities. He was clearly making things up on a routine basis.

3) I then saw that his IP was highly similar to several other previously banned posters, which strongly indicated this was an alt account. Which has been verified in this very thread.

This took me approximatley 5 minutes of research. It became abundantly clear that the user was in violation of multiple, permanent-ban-worthy rules simultaneously. I banned him.

I point all this out because I find the suggestion of some sort of grand persecution -- of moderators carefully tracking him, waiting for a time to catch him -- to be so enormously out of sync with reality that it deserved mention. I did not know he existed until a few moments before he was gone, and I had already forgotten his existence by the time this thread popped up.

That was the sum total of my experience with this user. There is no conspiracy, no burning hatred amongst the moderators for this poster. We were not watching his every step waiting for him to slip up, so that we could exact our seething animosity more palpably. The reality is much simpler: he was a random poster who clearly deserved to be banned for multiple reasons, so I banned him. The delusions of grandeur are so totally out of proportion with the pedestrian nature of his existance and final dismissal that this rare glimpe inside the moderation process seemed warranted.
 

Manics

Banned
Nov 12, 2004
11,332
0
0
51
Either blatantly trolling or being a complete tool for starters.
Before this is said and done it will most likely be revealed that he is an alt in one form or another also.

I'm not an alt. Greekboy himself came clean with his past accounts and I posted them in this thread for all to see. All your "sleuthing" is in large part due to me posting what Geeekboy's alt accounts were. Of course you'll find inconsistencies and lies in there because in the past Greekboy was trying to remain hidden. I'm telling you he's turned over a new leaf now and wants a fresh start and a final chance.
 

Kapura

Banned
Jul 30, 2009
4,546
0
0
i41.tinypic.com
We do not typically discuss moderation in any form (GAF is not moderated by committee) but I want to step forward for a moment to make one particular thing clear.

I was the moderator who banned this user, and I did so having never heard of him before. I do not have any interest in hockey (or almost any sport), so any threads he frequents are not those I frequent. Here is the exact order in which the events occured:

1) This poster (who already has a name that raises hackles, but is not itself worthy of any sort of moderation), made a thread which is already posted here -- he explained how he was dating a 19 year old girl and was thinking of "putting a baby in it" because her family was wealthy and he could presumably leech money from them. It was very inappropriate.

2) I then began searching the poster's history, and saw several equally horrid threads; contradictory tales which indicated he was vastly different ages, genders, and of hugely different personalities. He was clearly making things up on a routine basis.

3) I then saw that his IP was highly similar to several other previously banned posters, which strongly indicated this was an alt account. Which has been verified in this very thread.

This took me approximatley 5 minutes of research. It became abundantly clear that the user was in violation of multiple, permanent-ban-worthy rules simultaneously. I banned him.

I point all this out because I find the suggestion of some sort of grand persecution -- of moderators carefully tracking him, waiting for a time to catch him -- to be so enormously out of sync with reality that it deserved mention. I did not know he existed until a few moments before he was gone, and I had already forgotten his existence by the time this thread popped up.

That was the sum total of my experience with this user. There is no conspiracy, no burning hatred amongst the moderators for this poster. We were not watching his every step waiting for him to slip up, so that we could exact our seething animosity more palpably. The reality is much simpler: he was a random poster who clearly deserved to be banned for multiple reasons, so I banned him. The delusions of grandeur are so totally out of proportion with the pedestrian nature of his existance and final dismissal that this rare glimpe inside the moderation process seemed warranted.

well-earned tag there. I was hoping this was some sort of unified conspiracy theory of neogaf, including 9/11, hugo chavez, and of course ancient aliens. but no, it's mundane. i guess I'd better go post on other boards about how the islamification of america is designed to increase demand of Arab oil.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.