-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Ps5 vs XSX call of duty
- Thread starter geordiemp
- Start date
megreotsugua
Banned
The cheaper-to-produce and smaller APU die in the PS5 is performing better than the more expensive and bigger die with more transistors xsex APU.
PS5 is about efficiency.
Xsex is brute-forcing itself and still drops frames and bigger frames more often.
Cerny is a genius.
PS5 is about efficiency.
Xsex is brute-forcing itself and still drops frames and bigger frames more often.
Cerny is a genius.
danielJackson
Banned
And in the end while it is fun to see which one "wins", unless gamer owns both systems it doesnt matter at all.
Because they just buy the game for their system and play that, kind of weird if they would seriously care if their version is 5% faster or slower
If it would be 50fps vs 120fps, then I get it that it would annoy some people, but they are practically the same, which were known for months but xbox fanboys wanted to spam the "12tflops makes 3rd party games run 4k vs 144op"
A Most Virtuous Cat
Banned
Its very fun to read all the xbox damage control going on
Last edited:
Orta
Banned
Chukhopops
Member
Dreams:
Reality:
Can you at least try to choose two similar scenes before doing the cherry picking frames thing? There isn't even a single similarity between the two scenes.
Spukc
always chasing the next thrill
XSX is performing better here
Report me if I continue to console war
Neko Mimi Mode
Member
XSX is performing better here
To be fair, that's in campaign, though at least it's properly synched and isn't trying to compare an online match to an offline match with bots.
XsX does perform better there, but I'd wait for Digital Foundry for all the modes tbh.
The_Mike
I cry about SonyGaf from my chair in Redmond, WA
It's probably a joke, but I bite.
Technically, all platform can do 120 fps. What truly depends is what and how much they sacrifice to achieve it.
Ass of Can Whooping
Banned
Just wait for X game until i get my desired results
Chukhopops
Member
XSX is performing better here
PS5 dropping to 23 fps in the Reagan cutscene is pretty interesting, I don't think this thread will make it to 30 pages like the AC one...
Edit: and 40 fps in gameplay in the airport scene.
Last edited:
LisaMariaMartin
Banned
They aren't even comparing the same scenes let alone modes. Leave comparisons to the professionals.
Thirty7ven
Banned
399$ PS5 looking like an incredible piece of value.
Cerny did it. No wonder Microsoft stopped focusing on power vs power, they have nothing to show for.
Cerny did it. No wonder Microsoft stopped focusing on power vs power, they have nothing to show for.
Snowdonhoffen
Member
XSX is performing better here
The fact that there are drops on the CGI video cutscenes on both platforms makes me think this comparison might not be that reliable...
BlueXImpulse
Banned
PS5 is a powerhouse!
Armorian
Banned
This is interesting:
~30% better performance here on XSX, GPU bound scenario (cutscene). But we don't know how dynamic resolution system works, is XSX the same res, higher or lower?
Now in gameplay they perform the same:
Or PS5 has tiny better performance:
CAN'T WAIT FOR DF!!11!1
Freeman76
Member
Ps5 performing a bit better again.
Becoming a trend i guess.
Also xsx has 1 second drops that are bad but for 1 second like this one :
LOooooooL the very definition of reeeee-ching.
Chukhopops
Member
Actually the SP comparison seems pretty valid to me, same scene same mode
.Comparing online MP vs bots MP is not a galaxy brain move I agree though.
FunkMiller
Gold Member
Chukhopops
Member
Yeah look at the graphs below your screenshots and tell me PS5 works "the same or better".This is interesting:
~30% better performance here on XSX, GPU bound scenario (cutscene). But we don't know how dynamic resolution system works, is XSX the same res, higher or lower?
Now in gameplay they perform the same:
Or PS5 has tiny better performance:
CAN'T WAIT FOR DF!!11!1
Armorian
Banned
It's right after the cutscene where XSX has clear advantage so it's like that on the graph, and you can see that in gameplay part PS5 line is above.
assurdum
Banned
Just in this case?
Knitted Knight
Banned
Till NXGamer/DF...
These results are definetly not what some people were expecting and it's becoming a trend.
It will be interesting to try to understand what's going wrong on the XSX side, if the split memory bandwidth might be a issue (CPU has slower memory bandwidth), if there's some bottleneck somewhere, if the tools are totally shitty.
But yeah leaving alone the fanatics (that expected XSX to run games at native 4K with 60fps and ray tracing while PS5 in their minds would be dynamic 4K, 30fps with no ray tracing) a small advantage for the XSX was expected, in reality it's PS5 that is actually having small advantages in real games.
It will be interesting to try to understand what's going wrong on the XSX side, if the split memory bandwidth might be a issue (CPU has slower memory bandwidth), if there's some bottleneck somewhere, if the tools are totally shitty.
But yeah leaving alone the fanatics (that expected XSX to run games at native 4K with 60fps and ray tracing while PS5 in their minds would be dynamic 4K, 30fps with no ray tracing) a small advantage for the XSX was expected, in reality it's PS5 that is actually having small advantages in real games.
Last edited:
Chukhopops
Member
There are two seconds at 1m44s, everywhere else there are more drops including a long segment where PS5 is at +/- 45fps.
Aceofspades
Banned
I don't like that its comparing different scenes, but impressive result nonetheless for PS5.
assurdum
Banned
ok call me paranoic but why this comparison is all about cutscene and the only gameplay sequence mostly showed the serie X will better performance? Seems too much "on purpose" to me.This is interesting:
~30% better performance here on XSX, GPU bound scenario (cutscene). But we don't know how dynamic resolution system works, is XSX the same res, higher or lower?
Now in gameplay they perform the same:
Or PS5 has tiny better performance:
CAN'T WAIT FOR DF!!11!1
Last edited:
Dreams:
Reality:
This does indeed prove how right I am about your mindset, you don't bring anything to the subject but nonsense about console wars.
Bo_Hazem
Banned
djjinx2
Member
It's not a good comparison at all but overall they perform about the same with slight drops to ~110FPS in gameplay. Othere than this kill cam spot on XSX:
Only game with action, Vs guy staring at a bus using bots in private lobby. Yeah ok.
Physiognomonics
Member
Yes XSX seems to perform better in cutscenes, where the raw GPU + bandwidth advantage can shine. Once in gameplay (when the CPU is much more needed) it performs either the same or the PS5 has the advantage.
Bergoglio
Member
Bro, you're talking about Bo Hazem, move on.
Agnostic2020
Member
U didnt watch the video ? They r both playing multplayer and both are same in action as expected in MP .
assurdum
Banned
Yeah and the only playable sequence showed has such dramatic drop on ps5, I'm asking why. Mmm. mmm. Seems very valid to give an idea how works the whole performance.
Last edited:
geordiemp
Member
This is interesting:
~30% better performance here on XSX, GPU bound scenario (cutscene). But we don't know how dynamic resolution system works, is XSX the same res, higher or lower?
Now in gameplay they perform the same:
Or PS5 has tiny better performance:
CAN'T WAIT FOR DF!!11!1
Not to sure the source, but does not seem to be even counting the 30 FPS cut scenes correctly.
Mike Zhang
Member
Someone is arguing the different scene in the comparison, you don't get the point. The point is there is no such big drop on PS5
Thirty7ven
Banned
This what comes down to. I literally don’t give a rats ass if XSX performs better, it’s supposed to. But the games are coming out and the difference in performance is... cute.
Jigsaah
Gold Member
Lord help us all. You're taking these cherry picked screenshots on a literal millisecond drop in certain gameplay that's not even matching. This is "a win is a win" mentality in a contest that is not significant. You would think from the pic that the Xbox never hits 120fps.
Last edited:
Chukhopops
Member
And people were talking about damage control in the beginning of this thread, delicious.
Again, I think this thread will now quickly die considering the expected result isn't exactly obtained.
One more thing: dropping from 120 fps to (let's take the lowest) 82 fps is something you will barely notice. But going to 23fps in a cutscene... that will hurt.
Again, I think this thread will now quickly die considering the expected result isn't exactly obtained.
One more thing: dropping from 120 fps to (let's take the lowest) 82 fps is something you will barely notice. But going to 23fps in a cutscene... that will hurt.