• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
  • The Politics forum has been nuked. Please do not bring political discussion to the rest of the site, or you will be removed. Thanks.

Scientist Predicted 'Elon' Would Lead Humans On Mars Back In 1948

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Dec 3, 2013
49,171
104,508
1,430
 Scientist Predicted 'Elon' Would Lead Humans On Mars Back In 1948


We already know of Elon Musk's dream for mankind to colonise Mars, right? So here's some good news for people who are into that idea - back in the 1940s, a scientist 'predicted' that he would lead us there.

Well, sort of.

The manuscript for a book titled The Mars Project has been shared on social media, with people making the link between one key line and tech billionaire Elon Musk, who is at the forefront of the human effort to travel to the Red Planet.

Written by German scientist Wernher von Braun in 1948, the book is essentially a technical specification for the mechanics of life and society on Mars, explaining how it could work.

And one paragraph, which looks at how the planet will be governed, predicts that it will be led by the 'Elon'.

The passage, translated into English, reads: "The Martian government was directed by ten men, the leader of whom was elected by universal suffrage for five years and entitled the 'Elon'.



"Two houses of parliament enacted the laws to be administered by the Elon and his cabinet."

Now, this isn't a specific reference to the South African businessman, of course. It was written more than 70 years ago... but it's still very spooky.

With von Braun being a religious individual, the term is thought to stem from the Hebrew word meaning 'oak tree', likely referring to a leader being a sturdy individual.

The Mars Project was originally conceived as the appendix to Marsprojekt, a science fiction novel written by von Braun in 1948, but it formed the basis of a lecture he gave at the First Symposium on Spaceflight held in New York City three years later.

The following year, the appendix was published separately in Germany, before receiving an English publication in 1953.

And if recent developments are anything to go by, the real life Elon and his team are getting closer and closer to their ambition of making it to Mars in the next few years.

Just this week, SpaceX finally landed a version of its Mars-bound Starship rocket without it exploding into a million pieces, which is a huge achievement.

The SN15 rocket, a 165-foot leviathan, was launched from the company's Boca Chica testing facility in Texas at 5.25pm local time on 5 May and managed to get 10 kilometres up into the air, emerging from the top of a cloud that had previously been obscuring it, before descending horizontally and then righting itself at the last second by firing the engines.

SpaceX is getting closer to Mars-bound travel. Credit: PA


It's a seriously cool feat of engineering.

You wouldn't believe that a huge stainless steel rocket could successfully manage to stick such a delicate and soft landing, but it did.

That's more than can be said for some of the other tests they've had, where the rockets have been blown to smithereens either upon or just after landing.

After this one came down there were a few moments of tentative waiting as flames were spotted coming from the bottom of the machine.

Those fires were put out by remotely controlled water hoses, and it seems as if everything went pretty much to plan.

Naturally, Musk will have been delighted to see his project finally manage to stick a landing. After those fires had been extinguished - and with them, the threat of explosion - he tweeted: "Starship landing nominal!"
 

NickFire

Member
Mar 12, 2014
8,941
9,842
940
"Just this week, SpaceX finally landed a version of its Mars-bound Starship rocket without it exploding into a million pieces, which is a huge achievement."

That line cracks me up even though it really is an awesome achievement. Just can't help but chuckle at "without it exploding into a million pieces."

Man, this is probably the first SNL I've specifically looked forward to in a decade. Hoping they hit a home run on some science based skits.
 

bender

Bending Rodríguez (22, 1,729)
Apr 12, 2010
10,463
16,750
1,430
If anyone believes he'll lead us to Mars, we are wrong today as those scientist in in 1948.
 
  • Triggered
Reactions: ArtemisClydeFrog

Aesius

Member
May 19, 2009
7,338
1,585
1,220
Speak for yourself
What does that have to do with anything? He got a hair transplant and looks a million times more attractive and presentable. Now he’s got a cult of personality and is a super famous CEO. Wouldn’t have been as accepted by the public pre-transplant.
 
J

JeremyEtcetera

Unconfirmed Member
What does that have to do with anything? He got a hair transplant and looks a million times more attractive and presentable. Now he’s got a cult of personality and is a super famous CEO.
This is all true...now what happens?
 

TheAdlerian

Banned
Apr 18, 2021
122
48
125
His company is fake and a scheme to make money via installing fantasies in minds.

1. Electric cars: these were tried in the 1930s and don't work.

The current type do not charge fast and there's no place to charge them if they ever became popular. Millions of people in apartments can't charge them and at stations it takes too long. So, they will never become common.

2. Traffic tunnels: The tunneling machines don't work like on cartoons, so the idea is impossible.

3. Brain Link: that is an idea from Iain Banks Culture science fiction novels. We do not know how the brain works at this point and so we cannot link it to anything.

4. Mars: We can't fly in space or maneuver ships very well. We can point something at a place and time it to hit it. So, we have no craft to adapt to situations in space. We do not have the ability to land on Mars. We do not have the ability to take off if we could land. There's much more.

Right now he is testing hollow rockets that look like some kind of ship but they aren't the full weight with shielding etc for radiation and they don't have rooms etc.

His whole thing is a gimmick.
 
Nov 7, 2020
3,134
8,624
565
His company is fake and a scheme to make money via installing fantasies in minds.

1. Electric cars: these were tried in the 1930s and don't work.

The current type do not charge fast and there's no place to charge them if they ever became popular. Millions of people in apartments can't charge them and at stations it takes too long. So, they will never become common.

2. Traffic tunnels: The tunneling machines don't work like on cartoons, so the idea is impossible.

3. Brain Link: that is an idea from Iain Banks Culture science fiction novels. We do not know how the brain works at this point and so we cannot link it to anything.

4. Mars: We can't fly in space or maneuver ships very well. We can point something at a place and time it to hit it. So, we have no craft to adapt to situations in space. We do not have the ability to land on Mars. We do not have the ability to take off if we could land. There's much more.

Right now he is testing hollow rockets that look like some kind of ship but they aren't the full weight with shielding etc for radiation and they don't have rooms etc.

His whole thing is a gimmick.

The companies are actually real. What kind of truther bullshit is this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JeremyEtcetera

Burning Blade

Member
Apr 14, 2020
81
205
255
What does that have to do with anything? He got a hair transplant and looks a million times more attractive and presentable. Now he’s got a cult of personality and is a super famous CEO. Wouldn’t have been as accepted by the public pre-transplant.
When you have that kind of money what the fuck you need hair for.