Support NeoGAF

[SleepDoctor]

You seem upset.

Seems like we've already gone over this quite thoroughly.

I honestly don't know how every thread regarding each console gets derailed into the same shit. So bad that i forget what thread im in sometimes lol.

This guy is obviously "outraged" just look at his post history regarding Xbox. No need to act concerned.

 

[VCL]

it's not running at 1440p and 30 fps

 

[Aidah]

You seem upset.

I think we've already gone over this quite thoroughly over the past month.

What?

The only thing that irritated me is having to interact with a brand loyalist. I certainly wouldn't start a conversation with one as it would be totally pointless.

 

[jimbojim]

Yes, but 2080Ti is not Ampere.

Yes, i know. But Turing is sti better than RDNA 2.

 

[Degree]

It's then outrageous to use 2080Ti as a reference. Actually I kinda understand its price now, although I went for Radeon VII for productivity.

you do know that XSX is more powerful than 2080ti, right?

 

[Tulipanzo]

I can see why Sony reportedly didn't want this to happen.
Irrespective of any power gap, it's profoundly unimpressive to have stuff like this come to light.

Was there any game confirmed to be actually running on SeX, even for a brief snippet?

 

[Senua]

you do know that XSX is more powerful than 2080ti, right?

 

[ZywyPL]

So that (supposedly) CGI trailer is what the game is actually aiming for or what? That 2017 gameplay didn't show the game needs the most powerful card out there to run, to say the least... But I don't know, I read the dev interview recently on how the team started with just 5 people and now is at 40, so maybe things did change "a bit" since then, I'll be shocked if they manage to get the game looking close to that trailer, that Alien/Prometheus-like design just begs for better graphics than that 2017 gameplay.

 

[INC]

What speed was the SSD running at tho, that's far more important...........