Cheeseman Battitude
Member
I can't see it being a tablet simply because who games on a tablet on the go? The smallest screen size you'd want for a tablet is 7" and that's a bit big to carry around IMO.
What makes my suggestion asinine? Do you really think that Nintendo can compete with Sony and Microsoft on power in a home console? Even if the NX matches ps4 in power the ps4k is right around the corner. Nintendo needs something different.
A tablet that is 2x Wii U power could play Zelda and if you want a big screen experience then just do HDMI out and attach a traditional controller.
I don't think tablets in general are a novel market though; Nintendo would be jumping into a red ocean where it lacks the advantage.
Nintendo's statements, and all trustworthy sources point away from that scenario.
Not to mention that your idea sounds like an even more difficult sell than the Wii U. There exist, currently, two major consumer groups for video games. This will be simplified because I'm talking in broad strokes. Those who want cool graphics on a TV, and those who want portable gaming. Neither group wants to hook up cables more than once. Tablet console is a no-go. Making two devices and selling them separately with all or most games functioning on both with graphical differences is not just safer, but smarter than putting all eggs in one basket and then bodyslamming said basket.
I don't think anyone is proposing a generic tablet. I say something that is better and more elegantly designed than the nvidia shield. With Nintendo haptic control technology built in for far better control and allow for more traditional games than an iPad.
Madness.
Do you not think Nintendo would offer an optional streaming service on their existing platforms before drastically altering their (proven and profitable) business model? Why would they jettison the huge market of people without the internet connection quality or inclination to exclusive stream larger games? Sony bought Gaikai for hundreds of millions of dollars, and MS have been developing cloud tech for years. What makes you think Nintendo (a company that has typically stuck to tried and tested technology it can deliver to the widest audience possible) would be the first console manufacturer to exclusively move to cloud streaming for certain games?
I can see why the usage scenario you described might appeal to some people, but it is not a rational strategy for Nintendo.
Let's take the Wii U, which wasn't successful because most shunned the tablet, and take away the streaming capabilities for an HDMI out cable???
They have a habit of upending the tea table. What you're suggesting would be dousing the tea table with gasoline and dropping a lit match on it.That's Nintendo for you. Thinking logically isn't the way to predict their actions.
Stuff like this and the speculated "Nintendo Phone" thing might've maybe worked 6-7 years ago. By now if they were to do it, they might as well make a Nintendo PDA. Basically it's a death wish.
After Nintendo failing to tap into the tablet market with the Wii U, they wouldn't just make a tablet. The past however many years, they've had the goal to bring something new to the industry. A tablet wouldn't be anything new.
Seeing as tablets are a dying market, sounds about right for Nintendo to jump in now