• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Spotify, Universal Music Unveil AI Cover Songs Feature

HRK69

Gold Member
Premium subscribers will be able to use AI to make covers and remixes of songs from participating artists on UMG's roster.

Spotify and Universal Music Group have revealed an agreement for a new feature that allows premium subscribers to make AI-generated covers and remixes of songs.

The new feature, which wasn't given a release date, was revealed during Spotify's investor day on Thursday, available for subscribers and only for music from participating artists and songwriters. UMG and Spotify are touting the feature as a new revenue driver for music creators as they profit from the streams the fan-made content generates.

"Solving hard problems for music is what Spotify does, and fan-made covers and remixes are next," Spotify co-CEO Alex Norström said in a statement. "What we're building is grounded in consent, credit, and compensation for the artists and songwriters that take part. Through each technological transformation, we have worked together with Sir Lucian [Grainge, CEO of UMG] and his team to evolve the music ecosystem into a richer, more beneficial experience for fans and a more rewarding outcome for artists and songwriters."

Spotify didn't share details about how the cover feature works, or what artists would be participating in the new feature. UMG is the world's largest music company, and its roster of artists and songwriters includes Billie Eilish, Taylor Swift, Sabrina Carpenter and Post Malone among many others.

The feature is one of Spotify's most significant AI developments to date and comes about seven months after the company announced it had entered agreements with all of the major record companies to develop AI music products. How Spotify handles AI content on the platform has been a subject of significant discussion as listeners online have been vocal about their frustration with AI slop on streaming services. Spotify hasn't outlawed AI on its service, though the company introduced AI tagging this year, and the company said last year that it had removed 75 million spammy songs.


For UMG, the licensing deal with Spotify is just the latest in its AI strategy. The company had previously established AI deals with the likes of AI music generator Udio, Splice and Nvidia.

"The most valuable innovations in the music business always bring artists and fans closer together," Grainge said in a statement. "That principle is at the heart of this pioneering AI-enabled superfan initiative, which is designed to support human artistry, deepen fan relationships, and create additional revenue opportunities for artists and songwriters. Building on our long track record of leading the industry through technology changes, and collaborating with Alex, Gustav, Daniel and the team at Spotify, this initiative is firmly artist-centric, rooted in responsible AI, and will drive growth for the entire ecosystem."
 
Star Wars Disney Plus GIF by Mashable
 
So now when you ask Alexa to play a song without specifying the artist, instead of doing some random cover or some other random song with the same name, it'll play an AI cover?
 
What does this new Spotify AI initiative remind me of? Hmmm ...


 
Ok, hear me out here, I'm writing a screenplay for fun and there's a karaoke scene, it'd be cool to be able to hear what my imagined cast members would sound like singing my chosen songs.
 
'Participating artists'

Don't think anyone is remixing anything Floyd / Genesis / Queen / Stones / Beatles / Swift (lol) etc anytime soon then...
 
Last edited:
I saw a reddit thread "how to avoid AI artists in Spotify ?" I was like "what the hell is even that ?"

Thank God I'm still buying and ripping my CDs to my phone
 
Why are big corpos in such a rush to replace artists ASAP?

Blaming 'big corpo' is such a cop-out. Spotify makes money by selling memberships and advertising space, both of which depend on more users and more overall use. They'll do anything that they think will bring them more of both. If people don't want this then Spotify will remove it because it will cost them more than it brings in, simple as that. If this succeeds, and it might not, then it's because it's the consumers who are supporting it. If you don't want to see artists replaced then it's the people who need to support them, not some 'big corpo' boogieman.
 
'Participating artists'

Don't think anyone is remixing anything Floyd / Genesis / Queen / Stones / Beatles / Swift (lol) etc anytime soon then...
Actually, remember how some big artists have cashed out in recent years? Those songs could be used by the label without needing to ask.
 
Top Bottom