How did he change the pic though?
Is he so cool he has a little Photoshop minion that can quickly shop images?
God forbid he did it himself?
There was an original image that all the extra photoshops were based on. That's what he changed it to.
Someone should remove the Xbox One box so he can change it back to that other image if he wants to.
i got to be honest - I always thought this game would be locked at 60 and thought this thread was all a bunch of bollacks but wholly shitballs - that IGN preview pretty much killed that assumption. They basically said it's only rock solid 60fps on cut scenes and that it strives/targets 60fps during gameplay meaning it's not locked. They would never use that language otherwise nor would they call out the difference b/w gameplay and cut scenes.
wow - big news if you ask me as the haters seem to be right about this one (assuming IGN is correct).
sorry but I trust (somewhat) of an independent source than the ACTUAL DEV of the game. C'mon guys - I know gaf hypes shit but let's not lose our minds and try to ignore what's going on here. If you're not expecting a PS3 game to be rock solid 60fps on NEXT GEN than you're expectations are too low. If this game is not rock solid 60fps, it will be a disappointment simple as that. Not an opinion just a fact. Next gen people we expect better. I REALLY hope IGN is wrong.
seems that way and thanks for reminding me I don't need to buy it but I feel bad for the suckers who ND will get b/c they've been hyping 60 throughout so yes I am disappointed. I did buy wolfenstein.......and although good, way over hyped imo BUT rock solid 60fps (on pc at least).
I have no issue with 30 vs 60 in games but if you're going to sell a remaster of a game that came out on last gen system, hype it's 60 and not deliver, how anyone is not disappointed is beyond me. Good thing is this game will be down to 40 within a month, 30 by october and 25 bucks black friday so I'm holding out.
Sporting twice as many shadows and four times the texture mapping than the title that spawned it, Remastered is noticeably easier on the eyes
for anyone wondering about IGN's ability to speak about technical things:
This can't be real. It's like it's something some PR guy for a 540p game said to them once and they just straight up bought it like "Yup, sounds legit".
Not a chance.
I have no idea why, but this is infuriating
Because they pretend to be experts on the medium, even though they can't discern obvious differences. Just look at their preview for TLoU:Remastered. Twice the shadows, four times the textures. Wow, way to misunderstand some easy to understand technical details, IGN.
Thanks Didn't wanna make it too obvious. Earlier this evening I thought my time had gone to waste editing some of that stuff because nobody noticed it, and then a few hours later it ends up on Neil's phone. Not bad.