Wow. Nice find Kibbles.
fin said:
I actually perfer the Halo Wars version, are these Mark V? Or are they going for a Mark IV?
Yeah, these are Mark IV, the version used before Master Chief's Halo 1 variant, Mark V.
I definitely think it's sick, but I wouldn't write off Mark V. I actually like it considerably more than Mark VI, which I find too curvy. On the box cover, yeah, it looks cartoony, but I've seen concept art and certain shots in-game which show how awesomely bad ass and angular the Mark V armor really was.
Blueblur1 said:
Yeah, it seems a little odd that MS would let these leak out. But then that wouldn't be new with them. And is that a Heretic Elite to the right?
I don't know if they're "leaks" to be perfectly honest. From what I understand, Stuart Beattie is trying to sway Microsoft while simultaneously convincing studios that this is the approach to go and that he's the man to helm the project.
I can't speak much for his ability, but his choice when it comes to how to handle the Halo fiction is completely broken and I'm hoping Microsoft discards any efforts on his part - either forgetting a Halo film at the compromise and sanctity of the story or finding someone who loves Halo and would stay true to it. In my opinion, any Halo film should do three important things:
- Follow the basic concept and overarching story presented in Halo: Combat Evolved.
- Include enough dramatic and action sequences which diverge from the original that makes it compelling, yet simultaneously stay true to the story itself.
- Create a very solid foundation for future iterations while telling a complete and solid story as though there would be no others.
Of course, the fan boy approach is to throw a thousand teenage Spartans at the big screen and only have a Halo in the last twenty-five seconds of the film. Right?