Look...
Xbox markets a (selectively truthful) image as the customer friendly alternative, and are being (commendably) creative in trying to overhaul Sony's lead in a generation.
Sony just keeps doing what it's done for nigh on 3 decades now: making and selling the best games they can make for the best console they can offer at, recently, the best price (a pretty good price vs either Nintendo or xbox it seems)
Xbox fans are forced to think that the Xbox way is the single way that is valid and acceptable from a customer standpoint. Just like they're forced to think Bethesda is the leading video game development company in the industry right now.
This practice of applying one set of values to competing groups never works, and always breeds argument.
Both sides should live and let live: Xbox fans should be satisfied that they're working damn hard to get back in the game; ps fans should be satisfied that they remain undeniably at the top of numerous binary measures between the two. This is all good for gaming.
-----
On topic: i mentioned this earlier, but i think you're being exercised by a difference in values and priorities; you're not picking out glaring errors. PS are a firm hand at the wheel, you just don't currently have that particular wheel squarely in your mental crosshairs. PS bank on quality and consistency, they think they have a contract with their numerous and loyal fans to justify the high costs and rolling support for systems. I don't expect they think they have to work to make everything cheaper and quicker.