its not shenanigans or loving marriage, it's shenanigans or loving LTR or marriage. And marriage is essentially like russian roulette, you're putting the gov.s guns pointed at your head and a nutcracker holding your nuts.
More like bit informed.
Women are not evil. But you don't give another person overwhelming power over you, even if you love them and they're a good person now, people can change over time and you never know, also a few humans are also evil and know how to fake it too.Don't worry, I'm one of those evil creatures called woman, sucking the life out of every man I can get my hand on.
I never really got this aggressively anti-marriage attitude that some people have.
Best mating strategy engaged. Devout Roman Catholic. My wife is pregnant with our 9th child. A vast and glorious empire shall spring forth from my loins. Masculinity. Fecundity. Strength and honor.
legally, the government's guns are pointed at you. You've invited a bunch of strangers into the relationship that have not only made up a bunch of toxic rules, will keep making more toxic rules over time and applying them retroactively to your relation. People who're happily married have pointed out that where they live they'd be better off divorced in financial terms, due to all the incentives the government throws at women to become divorced.
Aye, about the fat chicks,
It's because women can be maliciously wicked and I don't even mean that sarcastic. They have to compensate their physical disadvantage. That's why I have difficulties with girls and tend to stick to boys as friends.
I would also say it's likely the betas would conspire to kill the alpha, in order to get sexual access from the females.
What I've heard is that humans practiced serial monogamy in the distant past, not lifelong monogamy.
I'm not placing emotional weight, sure the small single digit percent of nonhetero relations could wildly skew stats assuming most sources talking about divorce stats and most studies somehow failed to mention that. Past studies can't even include nonhetero marriages as these weren't even legal in most places.
The whole idea of single guys being the father of all the children is a ridiculous notion. That would create serious problems in the next generation where that the case as inbreeding would obligatorily occur.
It's not a new theory, in fact, the monogamy system was enforced for this very reason, most people actually descends from a minority of men, and enforcing monogamy also reduced conflicts between them.So I was thinking - it's really amazing what boring classes at college can do for your thought life, pity they don't work that way for my sex life. Anyway, I suppose everybody here is familiar with the genetic theory of human mating strategies : Sperm is cheap to produce, so men seek sex with as many women as possible to maximize the amount of children. On the other hand, women can only have a few children, so they seek the best possible males, maximizing the quality of their children.
On the other hand, humans are not completely products of our genes. If we judge by other primates, and oversimplify a little, the equilibrium state in a tribe is for an alpha male to have all the females, with a bit of illicit sex on the side. Clearly this does not favor the ninety percent of males who are not getting any, or very little. (As an aside, vestiges of this system can still be seen in high schools, not the most civilized of places, where a few males get all the sex, and most have none).
I wonder, then, if monogamy could be seen as a stratagem of the beta males and the females, against the alpha males? The beta males get regular sex, which they would not have under the old system. The females get help in raising their children, which a single alpha cannot supply for the whole harem - not, at any rate, as efficiently as a beta who can concentrate his whole attention on one nuclear family. The alphas get nothing, but they are a small percentage of the population and cannot very well work together anyway, since they seek a winner-takes-all situation.
Is this theory useful for understanding our behavior? I do not offer it as a replacement for the purely genetic theory, but a supplement.
Of course, the interests of betas and females are not totally identical here. The female would still prefer the alpha to be the father of her child; she just wants the beta to supply the resources and care to raise it. Which seems to fit in with the chaperonage systems seen in many patriarchal systems, the stigma of bastardy, and the absolute prohibition on adultery.
Much more interesting than astrophysics, for sure.
Hell yeah, that'll show them.
Kidnapping, making trades, etc.
I suppose you might be correct... If I were attracted to females...
Do you get out much? No dick pic sending fanny on tinder is pulling birds in real life, and masculinity has never been in more demand.
That's a salient point. I guess I should've given better context to what I was saying..
If my post came across strong, its because I'm alpha as fuck. and I've just woke up.
