A27_StarWolf
Banned
Incorrect.
No its pretty correct, the guy tends to be an ass. I can't watch him 90% of the time. I can watch the colbert report all day long though.
Incorrect.
ha ha. whatever cyan..
I don't know if this was mentioned, but Obama wants to get rid of the Department of Commerce. (wasn't that one of the agencies Perry said he'd abolish? i can't remember which 3 he said he'd torch)
That actually sounds good. But there must be some hidden socialist agenda. I'm keeping my eyes open.He wants to consolidate 6 agencies into one in order to save money and make things simpler.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...mmerce-trade/2012/01/13/gIQApszdvP_story.html
But yea, the Commerce dept would be one of them and be taken out/changed
No its pretty correct, the guy tends to be an ass. I can't watch him 90% of the time. I can watch the colbert report all day long though.
No its pretty correct, the guy tends to be an ass. I can't watch him 90% of the time. I can watch the colbert report all day long though.
What? Jon Stewart's an ass? What planet are you from? He's always pretty civil and gracious to people even when they absolutely disagree with him. Go watch the DeMint interview everyone's talking about. An ass doesn't interview someone with a diametrically opposed viewpoint like that.
That actually sounds good. But there must be some hidden socialist agenda. I'm keeping my eyes open.
Stewart? Really? I mean, Bill Maher I can understand (even though I like him), but Stewart's pretty innocuous overall.
From the same planet where Huntsman has a chance becoming president, and Newt is a respectable politician.
Except that he never says that government doesn't create "private sector jobs". He says that government doesn't create jobs period. In other words, government never created the job he has currently had for over 2 decades. You're right, it is a moronic statement for a government employee to make.
Hardly. Its called standing by the principles you preach. You simply can't sit back and say that government doesn't create jobs while you work at a government created job making six figures, while the average American makes 35k a year.
No. You just have to open a history book and read those facts.
herp a derp religion of peace
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...-prayer-psalm-109_n_1205059.html?ref=politics
I think you're cool and everything, but these types of posts are embarrassing and out of line. And as a foreigner, the posts stick out even more considering you don't live here/aren't qualified to make so many generalizations. No offense, just my opinion.
This is some hilarious bullshit revisionism. Typical though.
LoL! Sure it is. Which is why Obama lost the white vote in 2008 for no real reason.
He decided he didn't need to keep reading his holy book for context?
Btw, guyz. Apparently Herman Cain's gonna be on Bill Maher tonight. Should be entertaining. :lol
Btw, guyz. Apparently Herman Cain's gonna be on Bill Maher tonight. Should be entertaining. :lol
Btw, guyz. Apparently Herman Cain's gonna be on Bill Maher tonight. Should be entertaining. :lol
Eh, they're both idiots.
True equivalency!
Bill Clinton 43% of white vote
Al Gore 42%
John Kerry 41%
Obama: 43%
White voters hate white candidates confirmed.
Not sure why I'm responding to you after reading two samples of pure nonsense, but here I am...
The embryo began to form after obama won?Those people honestly didn't believe Obama was going to win the election. When he did, they were shocked and terrified, and the embryo of the tea party began to form.
The embryo began to form after obama won?
I'm out. You're just crazy.
The embryo began to form after obama won?[/]
Do you think the Birthers were rooted in racism? Tangent, I know, but I'm curious.
Erm, I'm an American dude. I'm also a minority, so I noticed the tea party rising up as soon as a black guy got to Washington. The hate was apparent before the election:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKUovpF9LWU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fieGfc6DL7k&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2b5QeYV2d6s&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpQtKe-cVuE&feature=related
And it materialized in the tea party after the election:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S38VioxnBaI
But yeah, let's ignore all that and pretend that the Tea Party arose because people felt they were taxed too much during an era when we had the lowest taxes ever.
Playing the race card is boring and lazy, and ignores the real mental issues this segment of nutjobs have.
Ah I could have sworn you were European. Maybe I'm confusing you with Meadow or whatever his name is
Those videos don't prove the majority of tea party types are racist. I think it's clear the republican party is benefiting from some racially motivated hatred but let's be clear: Clinton was viciously hated for 8 years, even after the economy turned around.
Ah I could have sworn you were European. Maybe I'm confusing you with Meadow or whatever his name is
Those videos don't prove the majority of tea party types are racist. I think it's clear the republican party is benefiting from some racially motivated hatred but let's be clear: Clinton was viciously hated for 8 years, even after the economy turned around.
Ugh. So Jon Stewart did his periodic token false equivalency bit yesterday. He targeted some broad who called the tea baggers "economic terrorists" for the debt ceiling fiasco, and was all "tsk tsk tsk".
What's particularly annoying about Stewart is that he realizes there's a fuckton of false equivalency bullshit always being thrown around and he himself has made fun of it millions of times. Then sure enough, even he goes ahead and partakes in it. Really disappointing and annoying.
People forget the sheer vitriol and over the top insanity that was clinton hatred. I'd say it easily surpassed obama hate. The infant internet just hadn't made it as ubiquitous and easy to spread as it is now. I think young people who never experienced that time period just lazily cry racism when they see obama hate.
Glenn Beck Suggests Tea Party Is Racist
In a startling admission from a major Tea Party champion, former Fox News host Glenn Beck said Friday that race may be a motivating factor in the Tea Party’s opposition to President Obama. In an interview with Fox Business host Andrew Napolitano, Beck said Obama and GOP front-runner Newt Gingrich are both “big government progressive,” so he doesn’t understand why Tea Party members are supporting Gingrich. “If you’re against [Obama] but you’re for [Gingrich], it must be about race,” Beck said:
BECK: "And I issued a challenge to Tea Party members. … [Gingrich] is a progressive. … If you have a big government progressive, or a big government progressive in Obama, one in Newt Gingrich, one in Obama, ask yourself this, Tea Party: is it about Obama’s race? Because that’s what it appears to be to me. If you’re against him but you’re for this guy, it must be about race."
Doesn't Beck also think Obama is a racist?
I was around for the Clinton hatred. It was nowhere as bad as it is right now. Let's face it, if Obama gets re-elected, the right in this country just might explode.
I found this interesting (and funny);
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2...-beck-suggests-tea-party-is-racist/?mobile=nc
Doesn't Beck also think Obama is a racist?
I don't see what that proves. Beck is insane and has a supreme hate for Gingrich. His argument was childish and has caused him to lose support
Excuse me while I go into ultra-partisan librul nazi mode, but seriously now? There's a million things I disagree with the tea baggers, stuff that I do think would actively harm a good portion of the population. BUT this debt ceiling thing is a completely different kettle of fish. Every person with one of them fancy college DEE-grees spoke about the utter devastation that would arise from not raising the debt ceiling. That they'd be putting the entire GLOBAL FUCKING ECONOMY at risk, and we'd have a worldwide depression. This is inarguably several times worse than gutting the entirely of medicare and social security. "Economic Terrorists" is more than appropriate for such behavior.
Or maybe the point is that you don't get to complain about over-the-top rhetoric and then engage in it.
Regardless of who is right, it never looks good to call the other side terrorists, even metaphorically. Nor does it ever look good on either side to insist the opposing side is entirely motivated by racism unless there is no other explanation.
I'm still waiting for your better reason for the Tea Party's formation.
The tea party was obviously created to capitalize off the supreme anger the health care debate generated, financed by republicans and corporatists. Hillarycare generated similar anger and hatred that the Clinton administration was unable to defeat, remember.
Yes he does. He thinks Ron Paul is a racist as well.
However, he does bring up a good point in that article (which was the original point that started this discussion); If the Tea Party is willing to fall in line to support someone like Gingrich and Romney, then what was their real beef with Obama? Simply that he was a democrat?