As an aside, why on earth would any single individual use the pronoun 'they'?
It's third person plural.
Is this simply because they don't want to use the term 'it'. Or are they passing themselves off as multiple individuals?
Humanity will be fine. It's the democratic West that's screwed.
It might be wrong but when i learned english they told me the pronoun "they" was also used as a gender neutral term. This was like 15 years ago, so no SJW nonsense involved.
Remember when the standard of bigotry was how the victim felt about it? Now we have to respect the feelings of a videogame character as a proxy for the group of developers who made it.
English is overly complicated for no reason, mainly because there's typically more exceptions to the rules than the rules themselves.I dont understand, why cant the robot be called he?
Since english is not my primary language i never understood the use of they instead of him/her
Regardless between this and Ion Fury, this is really starting to getting out of hand imo.
Goodness, that phrase right there at the end... good find, by the way.It is indeed exactly how you say:
According to the mod, FL4K was created by a "non-binary" person and by their insane logic "misgendering" that person's fictional creation is to be considered transphobic. The only thing I'd like to know is, since when do the personal rights of the creator extend to their fictional creations? How can you "misgender" a fantasy character that, by any stretch of the imagination, has no autonomous capacity to be offended or capable of making use of its rights?
I'm amused at how the mod is citing UK law for a fictional character where it does not apply. This is nothing more than a creator infusing xir's (am I doing this right?) own personality into a character in order to be outraged by proxy. No creator has the right to dictate, since interpretative work is done by the audience.
If somebody writes a book or makes a movie, it is not their right to dictate how I should be viewing their work. Sure they can be part of the discussion and formulate suggestions, but it is still my right to interpret their work however I see fit. Part of the pleasure about engaging with literature is coming to my own conclusions about the author's work. You don't get to dictate how I'm supposed to think about your story only because you're the one who created it.
If that were the case, then you'd need to get rid of a vast body of Hollywood movies that are based on the re-imagination of a popular book, you also couldn't have things like female Thor, gay Iceman, Nazi Captain America or black Spiderman because that's not how they were envisioned by their original creators. Heck, most of the "creative" output by the social justice militants is nothing more than a radical departure from a popular fictional character's original identity.
Creators create, they are not there to dictate how you're supposed to think about it, that's still your responsibility and your liberty.
English IS my primary language and I don't understand it either.Since english is not my primary language i never understood the use of they instead of him/her
UH OH strange, looks like Gearbox is gonna have to send the whole team to "sensitivity training" over that QA tester.
Thank you for your service so that the rest of us don't have to look.
So offense, outrage and transphobia "by proxy" is an official Gearbox moderation policy now.
Yeah... I think I'm done reading through that forum thread. I've seen enough, I'll take the "sensitivity training"... by proxy too.
Word of god, eh?
"We will not ban you for misgendering our fictional character, but we will 'take formal action', i.e. ban you if you misgender our fictional character."
We didn't ban you, but flagged your comment, hid your post and silenced your voice. You know, at this point I'd much rather cop a simple and straightforward ban.
Uh oh, I hope their QA tester won't be sent to the Gearbox mandatory sensitivity gulag. Gearbox can't even keep their own lore straight.
"Neuro divergent"
Fuck Gearbox.
I always thought the use of "they" was perfectly correct because otherwise, how are you supposed to refer to a third person that you don't know it's either a "he" or a "she"?I was never taught that And I have genuinely never encountered an individual person adopting the pronoun. It would be so difficult to maintain in conversation. Language cannot be marshalled like that.
I'm an old boy, so leaned grammar via the joys of Latin and Greek. You're right that 'they' is neutral, in as much as it isn't automatically associated with either male or female. In many ways, it's the plural of 'it'.
They wouldn't be able to use the third person plural in French though, as Ils and Elles do hint at gender. Or maybe they use an other term?
All too complicated for me.
Semantics. You know exactly what i meant and i don't know why you decided to focus on that specific word of my post when its whole point was about discussing the correct use of the pronoun "they".The word "gender" is itself SJW nonsense. If you use that word, and believe it is a real word, you're already co-opted by the movement. When I learned English (over a half-century ago) there was no such word as "gender" being used anywhere. There was only the proper word, "sex."
The word "gender" and the assumptions behind it are part of the psychological conditioning public education inflicts on people in order to mold them properly for the brave new world.
I always thought the use of "they" was perfectly correct because otherwise, how are you supposed to refer to a third person that you don't know it's either a "he" or a "she"?
I'm sure they'll use "El" since that pronoun is used for anything other than females (male, object, neutral).Do they dub their games in Spanish? I'd like to hear how they handle that. The subtitles could be interesting too.
Interesting, it seems like it originally worked pretty much the same as it does in spanish, i genuinely didn't know that. Not like it matters though, i'll get crucified if i try to pull that off nowadays.Historically, the correct choice was always "he." These days that's unacceptable so we have to contort subject-verb agreement into a torturous state to make everyone happy.
I'm sure they'll use "El" since that pronoun is used for anything other than females (male, object, neutral).
I always thought the use of "they" was perfectly correct because otherwise, how are you supposed to refer to a third person that you don't know it's either a "he" or a "she"?
Exactly. Especially if they want me to use a personal pronoun that is referring to a group for a single individual.My issue with fake or incorrect pronouns is not that people want to refer to themselves with such pronouns, but rather the fact that they think they have the right to force other people to use them. Forced speech is disgusting and enforcing it is draconian.
Hold on, let's not confuse some sort of bullshit SJW problem with actual disability hate speech which unlike SJW crap is a very real historical problem.
I'm autisic myself and I welcome the term neurodiversity to identify myself with. It's a welcome break to be neurodivergent, which expresses my right to be treated as an individual, rather than a lesser person with a disability.
The word retard is very problematic when levied against people with disabilities and I'm glad that word is not as acceptable in society as it once was.
I don't think that's being 'Woke' I think that's just fair enough. The SJW crowd are obsessed with making up any small thing that they can see as offensive. Disability hate speech and or slurs is definitely not close to that crap what so ever.
Retard wasn't a slur at first either. Just wait until kids start calling other kids "neuro diverse" as an insult.
Actually.... There are a few situations when "El" is used for female nouns, when referring to a grammatically feminine noun that starts with an "a" so you don't get two "a" sounds together (ex El águila).I'm sure they'll use "El" since that pronoun is used for anything other than females (male, object, neutral).
I like this. Fl4k identifies as an attack toaster in my gameplay.I'm calling it it. Frakking toaster.
This is...ummm...this is weaponized idiocy. Like, eff balls stupid.I think you're right. Nobody in history ever really liked pure democracy, it always led to cultural suicide after a long and unhappy period of mob rule. Generally transitioning into some kind of horrid despotism or totalitarian intermediate phase. The American Founders and other overly romantic intellectuals of the West thought they could make it work using representation instead of the straight dope.
But it looks like democracy, in whatever dosage, is invariably fatal. Doesn't take a degree in rocket surgery, it seems to me, to figure out why. The majority can barely tie their own shoelaces.
Looking back down the millenia, it seems to me that constitutional monarchy was by far the best system humankind ever devised. We owe George an apology. Having discarded and burned the whole model though, don't think there's any going back.