• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
  • Hi Guest. We've rebooted and consolidated our Communities section, so be sure to check it out and subscribe to some threads. Thanks!

Welcome to Trumps America

D

Deleted member 77995

Unconfirmed Member
"He didn't really mean it like that" is perhaps the most dishonest and spineless way of taking a lens to Trump.
 

Nobody_Important

Gold Member
May 22, 2018
5,591
5,276
650
"He didn't really mean it like that" is perhaps the most dishonest and spineless way of taking a lens to Trump.
I swear to god if I see that shit used one more time to hand wave Trumps BS then I am gonna use it in every single thread about the Left doing something wrong just to point out the hypocrisy. I'm tired of it.
 
Last edited:

GrizzleBoy

Banned
Jul 25, 2013
5,383
331
505
England
I guess this is what happens when your only political discussion happens in poliGAF and you don't actually go outside.

You just end up playing left vs right list wars.

"Hur dur OMG NOT SOCIALISM.", he typed into his phone while riding the publically funded transport of his choice, travelling along the roads maintained via public funds. Saluting the publically funded servicemen and women as he passed them.

Cheering Trump's latest wealth distribution strategy all the while.

"Hur dur Trump's murica" where you can have numerous corroboration of a dossier and have hyper partisan people on the internet still calling it fake like they care whether was any truth in it or not.

Seriously though, go outside.

America doesnt exist solely on Twitter, GAF or your favourite anti sjw YouTube channel.
 
Last edited:

Joe T.

Member
Oct 3, 2004
2,130
2,137
1,695
Montreal, Quebec
I took it literally because he meant it literally at the time because the imbecile was trying to fool his base, but it was never feasible.
Some examples from his base:


Notice how even the old lady wasn't saying Mexico would pay for it all? They understood that promise of a wall he was talking about couldn't be taken literally, everyone capable of rational thought understood this and even laughed about it when he threatened it would get 10 feet taller.

The fact he has not addressed the claim since then when its been brought up and the administrations constant attempts to avoid admitting it was a lie is proof of that. If it was such an innocent and innocuous claim like you are saying then why hasn't Trump just simply owned it? Why not just admit thats not what he meant? Why go through so much trouble to try and lie to the american people and tell them they aren't gonna pay for it?
It wasn't an "innocent and innocuous claim," it was a hyperbolic campaign promise used to highlight his push for tougher border security. You took it at face value, his supporters didn't. You're angry he couldn't make Mexico write a check for a wall you don't even think should be built, which is understandable, really, but I pity anyone that thought 1) a 2,000 mile concrete barrier was ever going to be built, 2) Mexico would hand over a check for it and 3) a politician would admit he/she wasn't being 100% straight about their campaign promises, regardless of whether you're a Democrat, Republican or Independent. Common sense.
 

DunDunDunpachi

Patient MembeR
Apr 18, 2018
15,041
28,739
1,260
USA
dunpachi.com
"He didn't really mean it like that" is perhaps the most dishonest and spineless way of taking a lens to Trump.
This would only be true if there wasn't an overwhelming body of evidence showing incomplete, slanted, and outright false coverage toward the Trump administration. I would compare "he didn't really mean it like that" to "look at all the crooks he surrounds himself with; he must be guilty". On their face, both statements are fairly empty but are rooted in some truth.

Trump's own blabbermouth is a separate issue entirely.
 

Brizzady

Banned
Jul 28, 2018
246
296
265
I'm willing to bet there are a lot more Trump haters that bought that line about Mexico directly paying for the wall than Trump supporters - confirmation bias and all that. "He's stupid, they're stupid, that's never going to happen" except there are interviews with groups of Trump supporters from a variety of media outlets since the 2016 election that shows they weren't taking it literally. Yet, two months after Trump explicitly stated his wall would be made up of steel slats there are still Democrats (and their supporters) referring to it as a 2,000 mile concrete barrier. What does that tell you about Dem supporters?

You want to believe Trump and his supporters thought a 2,000 mile concrete border would be paid by Mexico because it helps you insult their intelligence. The truth cuts through that.

There's no shortage of stupidity in the world. If you're trying to pin it to one political party or another you might need to take a step back and have a look at the bigger picture.
I'll pin the wall bullshit on the dummies who voted for him and who still support him. I do love admire their hypocrisy though. But never forget that one time when Obama wore a tan suit! What's treason compared to fashion anyway, right?
 

oagboghi2

Member
Apr 15, 2018
4,495
5,695
420
It wasn't an "innocent and innocuous claim," it was a hyperbolic campaign promise used to highlight his push for tougher border security. You took it at face value, his supporters didn't. You're angry he couldn't make Mexico write a check for a wall you don't even think should be built, which is understandable, really, but I pity anyone that thought 1) a 2,000 mile concrete barrier was ever going to be built, 2) Mexico would hand over a check for it and 3) a politician would admit he/she wasn't being 100% straight about their campaign promises, regardless of whether you're a Democrat, Republican or Independent. Common sense.
I do find it humorous that trump is the only politician in the country that apparently isn't allowed to use hyperbolic language during a campaign.
 

FullTilt18

Banned
Feb 16, 2019
157
176
160
People seem to take what the media says about Trump at face value, as if they don't have a long history of taking things he says out of context, or straight up pushing fake news. He did say Mexico could hand over billions in a one time payment (I guess this is the 'check' option everybody is obsessed with,) or increased visas costs, or taxing remittances, or... you get the point? He threw out lots of different ways Mexico would end up paying for the wall. I just find it rather laughable that certain people are losing their shit over lying when Bill Clinton (remember him?) lied to the grand jury, under oath, about raping his interns in the oval office, and not a single Democrat Senator voted to impeach. Democrats have no moral highground on anything. They never did. The ones pretending otherwise are simpy delusional and ignorant of reality.
 
Last edited:

Nobody_Important

Gold Member
May 22, 2018
5,591
5,276
650
This would only be true if there wasn't an overwhelming body of evidence showing incomplete, slanted, and outright false coverage toward the Trump administration. I would compare "he didn't really mean it like that" to "look at all the crooks he surrounds himself with; he must be guilty". On their face, both statements are fairly empty but are rooted in some truth.
See I would consider that a compelling and honest argument if I hadn't just seen about 3 years worth of the Right throwing Obama and Hillary under the bus for the people they associate themselves with. I mean I cannot even count how many times I have seen the picture of Hillary and Harvey Weinstein or whoever else together used to try and make a point. Or how many times I saw Obama grouped up with his pastor. And mind you thats without the various criminal and suspect behavior that Trumps associates have been proven to be guilty of. (Minus Weinstein of course)


So you will pardon me if I don't agree with the sentiment.
 
Last edited:
Nov 23, 2010
4,467
380
735
I guess this is what happens when your only political discussion happens in poliGAF and you don't actually go outside.

You just end up playing left vs right list wars.

"Hur dur OMG NOT SOCIALISM.", he typed into his phone while riding the publically funded transport of his choice, travelling along the roads maintained via public funds. Saluting the publically funded servicemen and women as he passed them.

Cheering Trump's latest wealth distribution strategy all the while.

"Hur dur Trump's murica" where you can have numerous corroboration of a dossier and have hyper partisan people on the internet still calling it fake like they care whether was any truth in it or not.

Seriously though, go outside.

America doesnt exist solely on Twitter, GAF or your favourite anti sjw YouTube channel.

What's so unique about Trump's wealth distribution strategy? He's signing many of the same laws a traditional Republican would sign and has signed. A lot of people love it.

Yeah, Pres. Trump ran on the fact the system is rigged and folks are being left behind but a lot of people don't want to address that.

Why should Pres. Trump go out of his way to help people who think America is already great? People who think the problems that he talked about on the campaign trail aren't real? People who want guys like Howard Schultz as their president after 4 years of Trump?

If you live in a world where life in America is better than ever and Trump is going to prison, then what do you need socialism for? Whether you're inside or outside, people like Elizabeth Warren or outsiders like Trump don't appeal to you.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 77995

Unconfirmed Member
I swear to god if I see that shit used one more time to hand wave Trumps BS then I am gonna use it in every single thread about the Left doing something wrong just to point out the hypocrisy. I'm tired of it.
Remember all the ruckus around the Green New Deal? They didn't mean it like that, no one was taking it literally, here's a Youtube video and a poll to prove AOC supporters don't buy into it 100%, etc.

This would only be true if there wasn't an overwhelming body of evidence showing incomplete, slanted, and outright false coverage toward the Trump administration. I would compare "he didn't really mean it like that" to "look at all the crooks he surrounds himself with; he must be guilty". On their face, both statements are fairly empty but are rooted in some truth.

Trump's own blabbermouth is a separate issue entirely.
These are two separate issues though. I think the media circus that surrounds Trump is laughable because it's clear he enjoys it and it's job security for a bunch of journalistic hacks. But instead of talking about how he misspelled hamburgers wrong on Tweet #37 of the day why don't they talk about his tax policy that will overwhelmingly hurt middle and lower class people within the decade while granting breaks to corporations and to the 1%.

I detest the media that whether through intentional machinations or inadvertent missteps that provides coverrup for Trump while also criticizing the fact that Trump's own direct words and actions are in direct confrontation with each other.
 

DunDunDunpachi

Patient MembeR
Apr 18, 2018
15,041
28,739
1,260
USA
dunpachi.com
These are two separate issues though. I think the media circus that surrounds Trump is laughable because it's clear he enjoys it and it's job security for a bunch of journalistic hacks. But instead of talking about how he misspelled hamburgers wrong on Tweet #37 of the day why don't they talk about his tax policy that will overwhelmingly hurt middle and lower class people within the decade while granting breaks to corporations and to the 1%.

I detest the media that whether through intentional machinations or inadvertent missteps that provides coverrup for Trump while also criticizing the fact that Trump's own direct words and actions are in direct confrontation with each other.
If the media is painting Trump with falsehoods then it is not two separate issues. We can argue about degree to which it happens but it's ultimately irrelevant: either the media is painting him with falsehoods or they aren't.

If you want to claim "he didn't really mean it like that" is an empty defense, then it needs to be an empty defense.

My question to you: Is it an empty defense? Or have there been instances where a headline or a quote or an interpretation was false, prompting the 100% reasonable response "he didn't really mean it like that"?

I mean, it's not really an uncommon defense. People use the phrase all the time to defend their politicians of choice. Go look up any argument about Superpredators or "you can keep your old doctor" or WMDs in Iraq or whatever and you'll see someone trying to defend the statements as "they didn't really mean it like that".

If there are instances where Trump "didn't really mean it like that" yet the media jumped to conclusions and portrayed him negatively before the facts came out, then the phrase is not the "most spineless and dishonest way of taking a lens to Trump" like you originally said. Rather, it would be a perfectly true statement in the instances where his statements are misrepresented by the media.

See I would consider that a compelling and honest argument if I hadn't just seen about 3 years worth of the Right throwing Obama and Hillary under the bus for the people they associate themselves with. I mean I cannot even count how many times I have seen the picture of Hillary and Harvey Weinstein or whoever else together used to try and make a point. Or how many times I saw Obama grouped up with his pastor. And mind you thats without the various criminal and suspect behavior that Trumps associates have been proven to be guilty of. (Minus Weinstein of course)

So you will pardon me if I don't agree with the sentiment.
Unlike you, I don't base my conclusions on how "my side" was treated over the course of x number of years.

Don't drag me down into your mentally-deficient manner of parsing reality. I am more interested in whether people are right or wrong, not some fabricated game between "Right" and "Left" where the rules are fake and the points don't matter.

 
Last edited:

Joe T.

Member
Oct 3, 2004
2,130
2,137
1,695
Montreal, Quebec
Remember all the ruckus around the Green New Deal? They didn't mean it like that, no one was taking it literally, here's a Youtube video and a poll to prove AOC supporters don't buy into it 100%, etc.
You're right, the Green New Deal is similar to the wall campaign promise. Notice how, generally speaking, Democrats aren't reading it the same way as Republicans? Open to interpretation. It wouldn't be taking so much heat if politicians could be trusted to handle such sweeping changes.
 

GrizzleBoy

Banned
Jul 25, 2013
5,383
331
505
England
What's so unique about Trump's wealth distribution strategy? He's signing many of the same laws a traditional Republican would sign and has signed. A lot of people love it.

Yeah, Pres. Trump ran on the fact the system is rigged and folks are being left behind but a lot of people don't want to address that.

Why should Pres. Trump go out of his way to help people who think America is already great? People who think the problems that he talked about on the campaign trail aren't real? People who want guys like Howard Schultz as their president after 4 years of Trump?

If you live in a world where life in America is better than ever and Trump is going to prison, then what do you need socialism for? Whether you're inside or outside, people like Elizabeth Warren or outsiders like Trump don't appeal to you.
None of what you said addresses the points I made because I don't think you understood them.

For instance, making fun out of "ermagerd no socialism!!!" while being oblivious to the many "socialist" policies they benefit fom and seeminglt unwittingly enjoy everyday becsuse theyre so eager to do left vs right list warz.
 
Jun 26, 2018
2,247
1,443
385
Milwaukee, WI
Remember all the ruckus around the Green New Deal? They didn't mean it like that, no one was taking it literally, here's a Youtube video and a poll to prove AOC supporters don't buy into it 100%, etc.
So, don't take a written proposal seriously, but take tweets or quotes attributed to unnamed sources as gospel? WTF kind of BS is that?
 

FullTilt18

Banned
Feb 16, 2019
157
176
160
why don't they talk about his tax policy that will overwhelmingly hurt middle and lower class people within the decade while granting breaks to corporations and to the 1%.
This is fake news and you know it. People are paying less in taxes. That doesn't hurt them. And the only reason they weren't made permanent was because Democrats voted against it.
 
Jun 26, 2018
2,247
1,443
385
Milwaukee, WI
Add another psycho, unhinged liberal to the list. He had better be careful who he points a gun at. Wow.

https://www.cbs17.com/news/national-news/man-pulls-gun-on-people-wearing-maga-hats-at-sam-s-club-officials-say/1791902713

BOWLING GREEN, Ky. (WKRN) - A Tennessee man is accused of pulling a gun on two people wearing "Make America Great Again" caps over the weekend at a business in Bowling Green.


Bowling Green police responded around 4:30 p.m. Saturday to multiple calls of an incident at Sam's Club on Ken Bale Boulevard.

According to an arrest citation, 57-year-old James Phillips of Sumner County, Tennessee, told detectives he walked past a man and woman and flipped them off solely for wearing MAGA hats.

Phillips, who was wearing a veterans hat, walked away but was then confronted by the man in the MAGA hat who flipped him off and put his hands in his face, the paperwork stated.

There was a verbal argument between the two and witnesses said Phillips pulled a gun on the man inside the store and, while outside he told the woman in the MAGA hat "it's a great day to die," officials said.

Detectives said a Glock .40 caliber gun with a round chambered was found in Phillips' pocket.

Phillips, a Cottontown resident, was arrested on a charge of wanton endangerment.

He was being held in the Warren County jail.
 

cryptoadam

... and he cannot lie
Feb 21, 2018
7,010
8,122
880
Add another psycho, unhinged liberal to the list. He had better be careful who he points a gun at. Wow.

https://www.cbs17.com/news/national-news/man-pulls-gun-on-people-wearing-maga-hats-at-sam-s-club-officials-say/1791902713

BOWLING GREEN, Ky. (WKRN) - A Tennessee man is accused of pulling a gun on two people wearing "Make America Great Again" caps over the weekend at a business in Bowling Green.


Bowling Green police responded around 4:30 p.m. Saturday to multiple calls of an incident at Sam's Club on Ken Bale Boulevard.

According to an arrest citation, 57-year-old James Phillips of Sumner County, Tennessee, told detectives he walked past a man and woman and flipped them off solely for wearing MAGA hats.

Phillips, who was wearing a veterans hat, walked away but was then confronted by the man in the MAGA hat who flipped him off and put his hands in his face, the paperwork stated.

There was a verbal argument between the two and witnesses said Phillips pulled a gun on the man inside the store and, while outside he told the woman in the MAGA hat "it's a great day to die," officials said.

Detectives said a Glock .40 caliber gun with a round chambered was found in Phillips' pocket.

Phillips, a Cottontown resident, was arrested on a charge of wanton endangerment.

He was being held in the Warren County jail.
Don't believe it unless the 2 MAGA hat wearers were from Nigeria and getting a sandwhich from Subway.

/S

If this guy shot these two people I am sure it would of been justified because everyone in a MAGA hat are future Hitlers, better get em now. When you see the Red hat you must attack.
 
D

Deleted member 77995

Unconfirmed Member
This is fake news and you know it. People are paying less in taxes. That doesn't hurt them. And the only reason they weren't made permanent was because Democrats voted against it.
Missing the point that in 2025 all of that goes out the window for lower and middle classes. They will pay more by then. Corporations and the .1% will fare much better off however.
 

infinitys_7th

Gold Member
Oct 1, 2006
5,094
5,567
1,560
Missing the point that in 2025 all of that goes out the window for lower and middle classes. They will pay more by then. Corporations and the .1% will fare much better off however.
You know, unless it gets extended.

I will say that I dislike policy being used like that, but the strategy is clear - it is a landmine for Democrats. Even if Trump wins in 2020, the stats are the presidency will probably switch in 2024 and Dems will probably have a majority for a couple of years thereafter. This is to give them a headache - either they extend the taxes, or they are responsible for a roughly 4% middle class tax hike.

This wasn't some plot to screw over the middle class, but to screw over Dems.
 

SoulUnison

Member
Dec 4, 2011
8,980
465
735
Portland, OR
I don’t really know what the bar is for a “personal attack,” so I’ll just say, as respectfully as possible, that I’m very disappointed in you and your total lack of critical or independent thinking skills.
 

Ten_Fold

Member
Jan 18, 2017
517
226
280
The sjw I’ve been running across is the ones who won’t comment on nothing good posted but as SOON as someone has a different opinion about how some girl was treated or something that’s controversial then they always wanna argue that shit is just annoying like damn ain’t got nothin better to do.
 

cryptoadam

... and he cannot lie
Feb 21, 2018
7,010
8,122
880
So now that Jussi's story is done and will soon be buried and forgotten how long until the next hoax?

The narrative of Racist Trumps America needs to be kept strong until 2020.

We need one of those counters XXXX days without a Hoax.
 

GrizzleBoy

Banned
Jul 25, 2013
5,383
331
505
England
So now that Jussi's story is done and will soon be buried and forgotten how long until the next hoax?

The narrative of Racist Trumps America needs to be kept strong until 2020.

We need one of those counters XXXX days without a Hoax.
Who knows?

Will it be before or after the next deranged Nazi shoots up a school, church, office block or synagogue?

Who knows?

Before or after the next far right/white nationalist terror plot?

Who knows?

America is just so full of surprises tbh.

There's just so much material to masturbate any bias you could ever have. It's a veritable outrage merchants dream for every spextrum of the political sphere.
 

DunDunDunpachi

Patient MembeR
Apr 18, 2018
15,041
28,739
1,260
USA
dunpachi.com
Who knows?

Will it be before or after the next deranged Nazi shoots up a school, church, office block or synagogue?

Who knows?

Before or after the next far right/white nationalist terror plot?

Who knows?

America is just so full of surprises tbh.

There's just so much material to masturbate any bias you could ever have. It's a veritable outrage merchants dream for every spextrum of the political sphere.
Woah, that really seemed to set you off.
 

FullTilt18

Banned
Feb 16, 2019
157
176
160
I'm sure the left wing media fucking subhuman cunts will make this the top story for at least a day, right? They won't completely ignore more left wing terrorism, will they?

 

DunDunDunpachi

Patient MembeR
Apr 18, 2018
15,041
28,739
1,260
USA
dunpachi.com
I'm sure the left wing media fucking subhuman cunts will make this the top story for at least a day, right? They won't completely ignore more left wing terrorism, will they?

Woah, what?

This isn't "terrorism", but this is pretty messed up. Maybe some journalists who care about violence should investigate it.
 

oagboghi2

Member
Apr 15, 2018
4,495
5,695
420
Woah, that really seemed to set you off.
Their desperate for a win.

Violence for a political goal is the definition of terrorism. You don't get to newspeak it away.
It's Berkeley. The media will just shrug, the administration will do nothing, and the students will continue to harass the college republican conservative groups.

No one cares. Liberals run that town.
 
Last edited:

DunDunDunpachi

Patient MembeR
Apr 18, 2018
15,041
28,739
1,260
USA
dunpachi.com
Violence for a political goal is the definition of terrorism. You don't get to newspeak it away.
Let's not continue letting "terrorism" be the "hate speech" accusation of the Right, shall we? The Bush era is over. We can just call it violence and prosecute people accordingly. It's already illegal to punch people.

Don't misuse terms like "newspeak", either. It is insulting to those of us who actually understand what it means. I am not twisting words around. I am not applying euphemisms. I am calling out the unnecessary use of a term like "terrorism".
 

Darkking2001

Banned
Jul 5, 2018
481
230
180
I'm sure the left wing media fucking subhuman cunts will make this the top story for at least a day, right? They won't completely ignore more left wing terrorism, will they?


Where did the 2nd guy in the 2nd video come from....he just just zipped in outta nowhere and was like surprise motherfucka
 

#Phonepunk#

Member
Sep 4, 2018
6,772
8,798
640
It's Berkeley. The media will just shrug, the administration will do nothing, and the students will continue to harass the college republican conservative groups.

No one cares. Liberals run that town.
yes this is just spoiled bored college kids doing the currently cool thing to do, blowing smoke up their own ass by spreading it on social media. they are in the safest place in the country for liberal expression, they aren't doing anything but hyping themselves up.

there were always these poli nerds in college, it just used to be easier to ignore them. i went to one protest meeting in my life and that was it. after that i just hung out w my friends who played music and smoked weed.

that's what these idiots should be doing. staying home. going out. hanging with friends. getting laid. getting drunk. living life. no, instead you got people travelling around trying to find white supremacists. what's the result? violence, pain, destruction. and both FOX and NBC cashing a fat check off you acting like a jackass.
 
Last edited:

cryptoadam

... and he cannot lie
Feb 21, 2018
7,010
8,122
880
I'm sure the left wing media fucking subhuman cunts will make this the top story for at least a day, right? They won't completely ignore more left wing terrorism, will they?

Whats the context here? What is the leadership institute? All I could see was a desk with red so I figured he was a MAGA guy.

So this was 2 guys attacking a guy because he had a desk set up about hoax hate crimes? WTF...

And don't count on the lamestream media to report anything that doesn't fit into the Orange Man Bad, Trumps America narrative.
 

FullTilt18

Banned
Feb 16, 2019
157
176
160
Let's not continue letting "terrorism" be the "hate speech" accusation of the Right, shall we? The Bush era is over. We can just call it violence and prosecute people accordingly. It's already illegal to punch people.
Terrorism is an actual thing (violence for political goals, which applies here.) Hate speech is anything leftist cunts don't like to hear and want punished.

Don't misuse terms like "newspeak", either. It is insulting to those of us who actually understand what it means. I am not twisting words around. I am not applying euphemisms. I am calling out the unnecessary use of a term like "terrorism".
I didn't misuse it. You're the one deciding that words don't actually mean what they mean anymore because it makes leftists looks like cunts. Do you not understand? Conservatives are regularly being attacked in the streets because the're conservatives, but the media likes to pretend it doesn't happen (or even gaslight, claiming it's really the right who are the violent ones.)
 
Last edited:

DunDunDunpachi

Patient MembeR
Apr 18, 2018
15,041
28,739
1,260
USA
dunpachi.com
Terrorism is an actual thing (violence for political goals, which applies here.) Hate speech is anything leftist cunts don't like to hear and want punished.

I didn't misuse it. You're the one deciding that words don't actually mean what they mean anymore because it makes leftists looks like cunts. Do you not understand? Conservatives are regularly being attacked in the streets because the're conservatives, but the media likes to pretend it doesn't happen (or even gaslight, claiming it's really the right who are the violent ones.)
Whatever dude. Don't come crying to me when "terrorism" becomes a meaningless politically-charged word just like "racist" and "Nazi" have become. I lived through the Bush years and watched our freedoms erode because a "terrorist" was around every corner.

Some stupid ideologues at college punched a kid. They should be prosecuted and given their punishment. That doesn't mean conservatives are being attacked on the streets.
 

ssolitare

Manbaby: The Member
Jan 12, 2009
17,167
2,041
1,180
Outrage culture indeed. Everyone saltivates about the next thing to hate. Hate is entertainment. Good luck.
 

FullTilt18

Banned
Feb 16, 2019
157
176
160
Whatever dude. Don't come crying to me when "terrorism" becomes a meaningless politically-charged word just like "racist" and "Nazi" have become.
The difference being, this is an actual act of terrorism. Just like the dude in Kentucky 2 days ago who pulled a gun on Trump supporters... for being Trump supporters. You may have not heard about that one because CNN, New York Times, Washington Post, NPR, Reuters, etc. never covered it. Reminder; these are the same outlets who vilified the Covington kids. Remember that? But when there's zero chance conservatives could be painted as the offender... silence. Nothing. It totally didn't happen. Anybody noticing a pattern is crazy.
 
Last edited:

Bolivar687

Member
Jun 13, 2014
4,860
2,535
555
USA
The difference being, this is an actual act of terrorism. Just like the dude in Kentucky 2 days ago who pulled a gun on Trump supporters... for being Trump supporters. You may have not heard about that one because CNN, New York Times, Washington Post, NPR, Reuters, etc. never covered it. Reminder; these are the same outlets who vilified the Covington kids. Remember that? But when there's zero chance conservatives could be painted as the offender... silence. Nothing. It totally didn't happen. Anybody noticing a pattern is crazy.
There's also a Turning Point USA kid who got physically attacked at Berkeley this week but, for the most part, only the local news adfiliate stations of the big networks are following it.

The way political violence is being weaponized by corporations is some really malicious and evil shit.
 

Joe T.

Member
Oct 3, 2004
2,130
2,137
1,695
Montreal, Quebec

Democrat-friendly activist, actor and proud Trump hater had his story believed right from the start with some very questionable circumstances. Meanwhile, a conservative student is on video being assaulted and the same outlet deems it an allegation.

Chances are neither case would have happened without this terrible media coverage fueling the political divide every single day for years. The media's earned the harsh words from the president.
 

Joe T.

Member
Oct 3, 2004
2,130
2,137
1,695
Montreal, Quebec

When police showed up to the restaurant, the woman told them the man shouldn't be allowed to eat in a Mexican restaurant. President Donald Trump is aiming to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.

As Falmouth police officers were escorting Santos out of the restaurant, Macarao said she took another swipe at Turner.

"I couldn’t imagine somebody just coming up and hitting them when there’s cops right here," Macarao said.

"She just tried to grab my hat in front of four officers, not smart," Turner said.

Santos, a Brazilian immigrant, said while she regrets her actions, she claims she was provoked.

“I had a little bit to drink maybe that’s the reason that I couldn’t walk away but being discriminated for so many times in my life, I just had to stand up for myself," she said. "He’s not a victim. I am the victim. I have been bullied, OK?”
-Boston25 News
 

cryptoadam

... and he cannot lie
Feb 21, 2018
7,010
8,122
880

When police showed up to the restaurant, the woman told them the man shouldn't be allowed to eat in a Mexican restaurant. President Donald Trump is aiming to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.

As Falmouth police officers were escorting Santos out of the restaurant, Macarao said she took another swipe at Turner.

"I couldn’t imagine somebody just coming up and hitting them when there’s cops right here," Macarao said.

"She just tried to grab my hat in front of four officers, not smart," Turner said.

Santos, a Brazilian immigrant, said while she regrets her actions, she claims she was provoked.

“I had a little bit to drink maybe that’s the reason that I couldn’t walk away but being discriminated for so many times in my life, I just had to stand up for myself," she said. "He’s not a victim. I am the victim. I have been bullied, OK?” -Boston25 News
Victimhood mentality right there.

What a bitch, stand up for herself against an easy target right. What does this guy have to do with other people who bullied you. And lets be honest if she attacked a black person she would automatically become one of those White-Latinos, like Zimmerman.
 

Joe T.

Member
Oct 3, 2004
2,130
2,137
1,695
Montreal, Quebec
Victimhood mentality right there.

What a bitch, stand up for herself against an easy target right. What does this guy have to do with other people who bullied you. And lets be honest if she attacked a black person she would automatically become one of those White-Latinos, like Zimmerman.
Looks like she might not be an American problem for much longer according to Boston's local CBS station:

"Deportation officers with ICE’s Fugitive Operations Team arrested Rosiane Santos, an unlawfully present citizen of Brazil, today near Falmouth, Massachusetts,” said ICE spokesman John Mohan." Santos was later released from ICE custody.

She has been ordered to appear before an immigration judge for removal proceedings.
This may sound callous, but that's about the most appropriate consequence one could expect in such a situation, facing removal proceedings because a "Make America Great Again" cap motivated you to assault the person wearing it.
 

cryptoadam

... and he cannot lie
Feb 21, 2018
7,010
8,122
880
Looks like she might not be an American problem for much longer according to Boston's local CBS station:



This may sound callous, but that's about the most appropriate consequence one could expect in such a situation, facing removal proceedings because a "Make America Great Again" cap motivated you to assault the person wearing it.
Man the irony is delicious on this one.

An illegal attacks someone wearing a MAGA hat and then gets busted and may get deported.
 

Joe T.

Member
Oct 3, 2004
2,130
2,137
1,695
Montreal, Quebec
Came across this (admittedly slightly cheesy) video and thought it deserved to be shared, this thread having come to mind. It highlights how Trump supporters with MAGA hats can be easily misrepresented, Covington story and CNN/Acosta making a brief appearance: