So from this thread this is what I got:
Windows is a PS2 as it has the most programs (games) for it so I don't have to worry about compatibility (games not reaching it in multiplatform releases). However it has the worst crafted OS (has the DRE incident though I doubt Windows is THAT bad)
Mac is a Gamecube. It doesn't get alot of multiplats (program compatibilities) and when it does they aren't as good as they can be. Though the benefit is that when the games (programs) released by Apple (Nintendo) or by third parties specified for the OS (console) they run better then anything on the other OS's (consoles). You get programs like Safari (Tales of Symphonia) that runs fast and efficient (great graphics and solid 60 fps) or Quicktime (Rogue Squadron 2) that does everything fantastic (tons of NPC's, amazing graphics, great framerate, etc.). Yes you can run a different said program (game) better on Windows (PS2, let's just pretend it was more powerful for now) but you can't get a program (game) that runs as well on Windows (PS2) as the programs (games) I listed for Mac.
Linux is a
Pandora. It's main draw in is that it can run programs (games) very efficiently due to coding and mods (emulation). However it is far harder to work with then other OS's (consoles).
Does this sound accurate?
That wasn't what I was saying I was asking why people say those things and why opinions on the OS are so differ?