• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

What's your take on Human Cloning... assuming they will start doing them next year? or couple years from now?

Nymphae

Banned
Probably not a good idea. Seems like something that would be reserved for the super rich to maintain power and control. What good is cloning to the average person really, maybe some medical applications but we shouldn't really be fucking around with duplicating people imo.
 
Is it cheating if it's with yourself? Wouldn't matter wifey would probably have an instant kill one for free out of frustration and get out of jail free card. See your honour he is still alive right next to me.

What's also freaky is cloning living spare parts from your own body, coming soon...
 
Last edited:

I_D

Member
I'm all for cloning of body parts. The whole concept seems like a perfect solution to a multitude of problems.

Regarding entire-human-cloning... I don't really have a problem with it, but I also don't see the point.
 

Woo-Fu

Banned
I can't wait. Once the millionaires can purchase cloning services for practically anything every other problem the world faces will look microscopic in comparison to what they do with cloning.

The 2040 Lakers will win everything with Bryant A, Bryant B, Bryant C, Bryant D, and Bryant E.
 
Last edited:

Cunth

Fingerlickin' Good!
I'm all for cloning of body parts. The whole concept seems like a perfect solution to a multitude of problems.

Regarding entire-human-cloning... I don't really have a problem with it, but I also don't see the point.
What if we just clone the whole thing and then chop off the parts we need? Clones don't have souls so we are free and clear lol
 

I_D

Member
What if we just clone the whole thing and then chop off the parts we need? Clones don't have souls so we are free and clear lol

Nobody has a soul. Souls aren't real.


It depends on the situation, though.
If the clone is an entire body, meaning it has thoughts, then it's essentially a human - no different from an identical twin. In that case, what you're describing would be morally wrong, and also a crime.


If "the whole thing" is just a collection of cells, without any brain and no thought patterns, I don't really see an issue with it.
 
assuming? next year? I guaran-damn-tee you someone probably already did it. hell, didn't China do something that's basically 1 step short of full human cloning a while ago?

fake edit: looked into it a little and it's gene editing baby and human/monkey hybrid (chimera).



 

TindalosPup

Member
o2uDIy5.jpg
 

Alx

Member
I think it's unnecessary, almost pointless. Although if it happened it would kill the idea that our identity is only based on our DNA, and we would probably realize that a clone isn't an identical copy of its source. So there's that.
 
Last edited:

GymWolf

Member
The planet is already over-populated, just make clones to salvage their organs when it is needed to save lifes.

Maybe make them brainless so they can't be considered humans, or just grow the organs.

It sound harsh but there is no really another practical use for clones, i mean do people really want to clone a humans and force him to be the girlfriend or the best friend of some loser with money to spare?!
 

#Phonepunk#

Banned
imo it's absurd to "assume they will start doing them next year or couple years from now"

humaning cloning is absurd magic but we live in an illiterate culture that thinks Rick and Morty "science" is just around the corner. as people have replaced religion with science, they replaced religious fantasy with scientific fantasy. i see people all the time convinced cloning or brain uploading or any number of miraculous technologies are "right around the corner". based on nothing at all. based on faith.

i mean go back and read Frankenstein. there's a book about fabricating a human life. that book came out hundreds of years ago. people were experimenting with humunculi in the medieval ages, never got anywhere. you can read books about ancient Egyptian magic and find spells about creating statues and imbuing them with life.

the fantasy of creating humans without the need for sex is an old one and i don't think the human race will EVER make it a reality.
 
Last edited:

Keihart

Member
I don't think it might be a good idea and almost nobody does, but, there is always a but. There probably a market for it, so i think it might already be happening somewhere if possible.

The ethical and logistical problems probably outweigh the benefits.
 

Airola

Member
I can already see the Exxxtreme Incest movie series started by some porn company out there, and boy will that series be long and popular!

EDIT: added two extra Xs to the title because why the hell not
 
Last edited:

I_D

Member
This is what comes of the modern STEM education.

You should read some Plato. He's very readable. I can give recommendations.

I've probably read more Plato than you have. :messenger_grinning_smiling:
I was already in high school when STEM was introduced, so it wasn't a huge part of my school's curricula.

Also, what a strange thing to critique...
 

iconmaster

Banned
I've probably read more Plato than you have. :messenger_grinning_smiling:

Good, there's hope for you yet.

Here's my expectation for cloning:

1. Someone manages to grow a complete human in a lab.

2. They realize you can keep a body alive artificially but can't endow it with a soul.

3. However, so long as the lab human can pass the Turing test, no one will know any better.

4. A combination of brain-stimulating hardware and AI software allows the lab human to resemble a real person in casual interactions, and
technological miniaturization allows the components to be stored discreetly within.

5. We find out this has all actually been the case since the late 1980s.
 

I_D

Member
Good, there's hope for you yet.

Here's my expectation for cloning:

1. Someone manages to grow a complete human in a lab.

2. They realize you can keep a body alive artificially but can't endow it with a soul.

3. However, so long as the lab human can pass the Turing test, no one will know any better.

4. A combination of brain-stimulating hardware and AI software allows the lab human to resemble a real person in casual interactions, and
technological miniaturization allows the components to be stored discreetly within.

5. We find out this has all actually been the case since the late 1980s.


Surely just creating a robot would be cheaper in the long run?

What would be the point of cloning an entire person?
 
Top Bottom