Congratulatoions, you haven't been reading this thread.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Who is the most famous person in human history?
- Thread starter Arc
- Start date
- Status
Congratulatoions, you haven't been reading this thread.
Red Arremer
Member
Gabriel_Logan
Member
A majority of historians agree he actually existed despite scarce primary sources. GAF loves to pretend otherwise.
Gabriel_Logan
Member
Lets hear them.
Soapbox Killer
Grand Nagus
I didn't see it. Does he cover this in some way?
He's so famous, you could misspell his first name way worse and people still would know who you're talking about.
Red Arremer
Member
It's funny when you asked someone about romans they said caesar they're better leaders or emperors then him.
Last_colossi
Member
Ah very true, I didn't think of that.
But since we're talking about newer generations, do you think kids today know about Jesus as much as previous generations?
Hitler has only gone about 90 years with most people in the world knowing about him, so that's definitely less than the number of people who have known of Jesus historically.
Tho we're assuming "most famous" among people alive today, no? that was my assumption, at least.
RickFrick'n
Banned
Are we including populations who have died in the number of humans who recognise a historical figure? Or are we talking "Who's the most famous human for people living right now"? If it's the former, then folks like Hitler, Elvis, or Walt are almost certainly out.
For my money I would say Mr. Alexander the Great. That guy, and his notoriety, got around!
For my money I would say Mr. Alexander the Great. That guy, and his notoriety, got around!
ForsakenLotus
Member
LegalEagleMike
Member
Jest Chillin
Member
Yes. Even in areas of the world where religions that reference him aren't as prominent as they once were, kids have heard of him.
spiderman123
Member
Well according to the web and youtube. Taylor Swift.
Last_colossi
Member
That sounds about right, even if kids don't know exactly who he was they would probably at least know his name I guess.
Soapbox Killer
Grand Nagus
It might be Micheal Jackson or even Trump. More people live on Earth now than in history combined( correct me if i'm wrong), couple that with the Internet making the world smaller and Billions of people know the name Donald Trump.
I mean at a certain point that is true all historical figures. This is a spectrum. You can draw a line, but because it is a spectrum it will ultimately be arbitrary.
What about people we know less about but are more sure they existed? That's the root of the issue. The conception of a person and the person themselves are not the same thing, and I don't believe there is a way out of that problem. We know very few of the things that happened in Ceaser's life, and much of what we do know is filtered through a variety of means.
The other problem this runs into is that it would work against all famous people, since something that comes along with fame is having things misattributed to you. Look at all the fake Einstein quotes for instance.
What does it mean to believe that the "fictional version was the real person". I assume you mean people accepting that the movie was a record of events that happened, which is the sticking point I doubt people would do that, and that the character he played was not a character being played by someone. Without knowing the alternative, i.e. people aware that the character itself was a fabrication, he would have to be taken seriously as a historical figure. That's the nature of our knowledge of the past.
Not seeing many mentions of Mao Zedong, though I doubt he can contend for *the* most famous, he's gotta be up there.
Jesus was a real person. I guess a lot people assume he's just a symbol for god because they automatically dismiss religion. While we're at it, Buddha was a real person too.
Jesus was a real person. I guess a lot people assume he's just a symbol for god because they automatically dismiss religion. While we're at it, Buddha was a real person too.
Ghandi
Mao
Hitler
Genghis khan
Kublai khan
Stalin
MLK
Lenin
George Washington.
Muhammad
Probably a bunch of east and south Asian leaders I don't know about since my school only taught European and American history.
spazchicken
Member
Von Krukru
Banned
Sasha Grey
TheUntamedLegend
Member
Hitler has got to have the most recognizable face, right?
Michael transcends all
How do you rank this, people who know the name? Because I'm sure a lot of people know about a guy called Jesus but I'm pretty sure very few actually read accounts of him.
Like another one I see mentioned a lot is Elvis, who I know by name but I'm pretty sure I've never heard any of his songs or know anything about him.
Like another one I see mentioned a lot is Elvis, who I know by name but I'm pretty sure I've never heard any of his songs or know anything about him.
Fair
Roberto Larcos
Member
Would Stalin not beat Mao?
As for sportsperson, I'd have to say Pelé, Maradona, Ronaldo, Cristiano Ronaldo or Lionel Messi. Boxing misses India. NBA misses most of the world.
One of these is not like the others...
Red Arremer
Member
It's Gandhi.
And no way are Lenin, Kublai Khan or even MLK more well-known than the single most well-known Roman emperor. The others might be arguable.
Soccer balls still replacing people's brains
CrazedProfessional
Member
The Queen.
MushroomSamba
Member
Michael Jordan.
Yoshimitsu126
Member
Ronald McDonald
I guarantee you that messi is better known worldwide than Ali.
Chmpocalypse
Blizzard
That actually existed? Tough call.
Mythologically speaking, with no real evidence they were a real person? Probably Jesus.
Mythologically speaking, with no real evidence they were a real person? Probably Jesus.
Roberto Larcos
Member
If you ignore the huge weight of historical evidence, sure.
Is he really? is he?
But still, Messi is not even the best known soccer player, is he more famous than any of the Ronaldos, Pelé or Maradona?
- Status