Ok, so recently, this controversary has been getting a bit more traction in some parts of the Internet. Era is the obvious one, but I'm seeing more traction on other forums/sites too. At first I was a bit relucant to talk about it but after some talking I figured I'd get this thread here too. Ahem...
Before I talk, I'd like to say that I'm a male, not a girl. I don't have any 'sexual' personality, whatever that is. I sometimes do review, but there are some games I and other women would criticize, that has nothing to do slut or racism, it has to do with frustration. How are we supposed to combat sexism in gaming, if the biggest thing and examples, which reinforce and reflect the sexist viewpoints - is consistently let slide?
If we have a game, where all dudes like me are covered, and a girl has only the bikini or partially nude and feels uncomfortable, then it's sexist, because it reinforces this idea tht all women are 'objects' and exist solely for pleasure. Like, ew, that's disgusting. The women wants to be treated like goddamn peoples, and NOT for pleasure.
There's nothing wrong with a woman wearing a bikini if a game is set in beach, and the male characters are in their swimming trunks. But to me, I just feel like lately I've noticed that developers are so desperate for those personal things, like boobs, and it just feels like 'Wow, do you want to do this badly? Can't you, like, leave us alone for five minutes?!' If she needs to be undressed, then come on, at least let her wear bras and skirts. It just feels like, 'okay, we get it already, this game is for dudes, and the women are there just for eye candy and pleasure' I'm a male, but this still doesn't mean I can't ask this, for the sake of other women: Can we stop now, please?
TLDR: I (and the other women) feel like the game developers are so desperate, that they actually want to make sexualized designs of the women. It's like they want the dudes to feel pleasure with other women, whenever it be intentional or not, and it's getting tiring and annoying to let the women be simply called objects, thus making the actions sexist. They are not objects, they are peoples, and they want to be treated as such.
Unh...with this long post out now, I'd like to know your opinion, so far about the sexism in gaming.
First off, a note on the title.
Rigour would've had you writing "Why some women criticize [what they perceive as] sexualized character designs" instead. Because, no, it's not true that the criticism you speak of is widespread among women - at least you have not provided
any evidence to support the claim. And no, it's not true that the majority of women view sexualized designs are inherently problematic. Thirdly, no, it's not true that most women view sexualization as sexism. You have yet to provide any evidence to back these claims up. And, no, you have not been elected by women as their representative and thus cannot presume to speak on their behalf. These are all
your opinions and
yours alone.
With that out of the way, let's address their substance.
Definitions are in order, particularly because you seem to be rather confused.
A. Sexism is the belief and/or behaviour rooted in the belief that one gender and all its members are inherently superior to the other gender and all its members.
B. Sexualization is the process and the effects of emphasizing erogenous zones in the depiction of the human figure.
For a game to be sexist (a), it would have to somehow attempt to convey the message that in real life one gender is inherently superior to the other. It is obvious that (b) sexualization is completely ill-suited to that effect. How would emphasizing bosom, buttocks and other parts of the female anatomy in a obviously laudatory way ever be tantamount to declaring all women inferior to all men?
It's self-evidently an absurd claim.
So what's the real root cause of your criticism, then? A derogatory view of sexuality, that's what it is. It's criticism predicated on the belief that sex is tainted, a blemish, that states adults are not sovereign, that deems them incapable of making basic decisions such as to what to wear and whom to sleep with and frowns upon them exercising their freedom. But in fact NPCs and PCs who get the so-called sexualized treatment are uniformly portrayed as adults acting out of their own volition. Why would you have a problem with fictional adults doing what they fictionally see fit? Only a puritanical view of sex masquerading as progressivism would allow someone to point a finger at that.
Another ludicrous point is the attempt to claim that appreciating any given human for having attribute X is equal to reducing him or her to X object. If that were true, appreciating someone's brightness would be reducing her to an IQ object, admiring his artistic talent would be equal to viewing him merely as an art object and so on. Yet these claims aren't ever made, so patently absurd they'd be regarded as. The reason for this blatant double-standard is the same: a world view that deems sex dirty, lesser, shameful, connubial alone. A self-conscious religious residue trying to shapeshift into secular identity politics. That's what it is.
If you don't want to play games with certain traits, the problem is one of the easiest to solve. Don't play them. At all. Don't buy them. At all. Don't promote them. At all. Vote with your wallet. Beyond that strictly personal sphere, you do not get to decide what others should like and how companies do business. What would give you that right? Why would
I ever consider conducting myself according to
your worldview when you can't make a rational case for it?
Your attempt to stigmatize people who do want those characteristics in games has failed with equal eloquence. You have provided neither a moral nor a philosophical foundation for your views and as such, instead of followed, they can be dismissed without hesitation.