freenudemacusers
Member
you fools
never bet against cameron
why
why
never bet against cameron
why
why
ah I see, shady shitBest of both worlds doesn't really count, since tickets were selling at a large premium over what was the typical movie price, even in 3D. They sold it as a movie concert rather than a concert movie to justify charging $15-20 a ticket.
you fools
never bet against cameron
why
why
Of course it did, it was a semi sequel conclusion to a 20 year old series. There wasn't much left to do even if it was huge.
People saying WB is sad? they didn't even need DC movies again besides Batman until just recently.
TDK & TDKR each did better than multiple Marvel movies combined.
and thats not even counting them having Harry Potter. Now that its over they do need MOS to preform well, and its looking like it will.
If not, then yes they are in huge trouble.
Let the Avatar avatar bets begin again!
well hopefully if superman is a success they decide to make a wonder woman film.
It's too much of a gamble. It could either be bigger than Avatar (with China maybe taking a bigger role), or maybe the name has been tainted, in which case it will make tons of money, but not another 2 billion+.
Female superheroes do not sell!
Now, how about another Batman reboot?
i hope they don't reboot batman until at least the next decade
Crazy how things change. I remember when TDK was about to come out, they were saying its going to bitchslap Iron mans BO and it did. If you were to tell me IM3 would eclipse TDKR BO in 2008 I would have laughed at you.
It makes me wonder how TDK would do today with a 3d tax on top.
Crazy how things change. I remember when TDK was about to come out, they were saying its going to bitchslap Iron mans BO and it did. If you were to tell me IM3 would eclipse TDKR BO in 2008 I would have laughed at you.
It makes me wonder how TDK would do today with a 3d tax on top.
About $1.25b as opposed to the $1b it made. 3D tickets are about 30% more at most and assume that 70% of audiences will watch in 3D.
Crazy how things change. I remember when TDK was about to come out, they were saying its going to bitchslap Iron mans BO and it did. If you were to tell me IM3 would eclipse TDKR BO in 2008 I would have laughed at you.
It makes me wonder how TDK would do today with a 3d tax on top.
Which was the director's and producer's fault. They chose that direction for the new film, instead of doing what they're doing now. The Man of Steel is what SHOULD have happened back in 2006.
And the Avengers did better than both TDK and TDKR.
No one is saying WB is sad. People are saying that DC is sad. DC should be pumping out movies like Marvel is doing. Iron Man, Spider Man, Thor, Captain America, Wolverine, X-Men, and the Avengers are all flying high, and DC is still trying to get their guys off the ground.
Marvel is fucking Kiling it yall
Guardians of the Galaxy feels like the surprise hit/dark horse of phase 2. I REALLY feel good about it.
Ant Man seems like it could do a mix of Cap Am and Thor in sales/reception.....
However
Black Panther is the one that I'm kind of weary about. It literally has to be 8/10 and higher type of good for it to sell well and be received. Like Directors and Cast have to be in sync with each other on that one. It will be hard selling a remote African country to people in America let alone people over seas.
The only thing holding Black Panther back from mega sucess is the actor being black.
The reasons for this should be obvious.
The only thing holding Black Panther back from mega sucess is the actor being black.
The reasons for this should be obvious.
Avatar 2 will do $1 billion minimum OS guaranteed. No way it only does half the business of Avatar.
I'll bet that Avatar 2 will do $1.5b WW minimum.
The only thing holding Black Panther back from mega sucess is the actor being black.
The reasons for this should be obvious.
I'm surprised people didn't see IM3 being big. People like RDJ. The Avengers was fucking huge. RDJ is great as Tony Stark. The casting was perfect. Its going to be really hard to find someone to fill his shoes.
Pain and Gain is good. The Rock is great in it.
The only thing holding Black Panther back from mega sucess is the actor being black.
The reasons for this should be obvious.
Blade was for the most part the beginning of this whole super hero thing. For me the problem with Black Panther, is that I have no idea who that is, but if they made an awesome movie I think people would embrace it. The reasoning for this is not obvious. Plus Blade was not exactly a well known character either. They made a good movie, which turned into a trilogy, and people went and saw it. This racial bull shit is silly.
It will be just Panther. Calling it now
Marvel is fucking Kiling it yall
Guardians of the Galaxy feels like the surprise hit/dark horse of phase 2. I REALLY feel good about it.
Ant Man seems like it could do a mix of Cap Am and Thor in sales/reception.....
However
Black Panther is the one that I'm kind of weary about. It literally has to be 8/10 and higher type of good for it to sell well and be received. Like Directors and Cast have to be in sync with each other on that one. It will be hard selling a remote African country to people in America let alone people over seas.
About $1.25b as opposed to the $1b it made. 3D tickets are about 30% more at most and assume that 70% of audiences will watch in 3D.
The problem with Black Panther is the name. It will be an issue in America.
I don't know how it can be any harder to sell black panther's universe then it is to sell thor's. It is a freaking fantasy you put a story in front of a person long enough and they will believe it or anything really.
No it won't the only people that will have an issue with the name is old racist people, everyone else will think it's a cool name especially the target demo of 18-40 or whatever it is.
White audiences have a habit of avoiding "black movies." Marketing Black Panther the wrong way could ensure it has the box office gross of a spike lee joint or tyler perry flick.
The Blade movies did a very good job of positioning a Black Hero at the center of a franchise, and it's likely BP will take cues from that.
You underestimate how kids are a huge base for Marvel movies and the name might turn parents off.
The "black" movies from the past were clearly targeted to black audiences, obviously black panther won't. I expect it to be treated like every other action/adventure movie that has a main black character. People just overreact to the label of black movie those movie executives included.
It's too much of a gamble. It could either be bigger than Avatar (with China maybe taking a bigger role), or maybe the name has been tainted, in which case it will make tons of money, but not another 2 billion+.
You underestimate how kids are a huge base for Marvel movies and the name might turn parents off.