• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Yikes, time to cancel John Cleese as he says "London isn’t an English city anymore". Burn all your Monty Python DVDs

ROMhack

Member
Jul 14, 2018
1,424
1,120
550
If you try to suggest that something e.g. knife crime might have a strong cultural element, it makes the diversity-loving left deeply uncomfortable and the link should be dismissed. People here are encouraged to lie to themselves in regard to social problems. It's better to not notice the bad stuff and just get back to praising multiculturalism.
I agree with your other points but I personally know plenty of left-leaning peeps who criticise non-western cultures, usually with regard to attitudes towards women/homosexuals. You won't see it much online but you have to take that with a pinch of salt because a) people are scared of losing face, and b) only the extreme views either side get noticed.
 
Last edited:

Cybrwzrd

Anime waifu panty shots are basically the same thing as paintings of the french baroque masters, if you think about it.
Sep 29, 2014
4,195
4,523
785
Why did it become acceptable for immigrants to not assimilate to their host culture? Multiculturalism only works if everyone has the same basic values and wears a veneer of their unique culture.

When in Rome, do as the romans. Dont act like barbarians.
 

juliotendo

Gold Member
Jan 5, 2019
787
1,321
515
Mexico
Nothing wrong with diversity and melting pots as long as the cultures are good cultures.

If all you have are bearded lunatics screaming and chanting death to England and groups of individuals from third world cesspools lighting cars on fire that still squat when they shower or defecate, you probably will have a problem.
 
Last edited:

Bogey

Member
May 4, 2014
215
118
290
As a non-English person living in London.. he's entirely right.

I'd estimate 80%+ of people at my workplace aren't English (many may have British passports by now, but you know what I mean) - this is in a highly qualified/highly paid sector, though if I look at restaurant & retail staff etc., I doubt it's much different in most other areas of business.
The majority of my neighbours and people living in my area aren't British. The majority of people I see when I'm around town aren't English, and not just the tourists.

Now whether you see this massive mix of cultures as a good thing or not is entirely up to you.. Some may favor openness, international cuisine etc., others might be predominantly worried about clashing cultures and crime. But either way, the fact that this city isn't particularly English shouldn't be too controversial really.
 

somerset

Banned
Apr 15, 2019
443
606
420
John Cleese is deep state- at least an associate of the people who run the deep state in the UK. Cleese is oxbridge and BBC, and has always been associated with MI5/MI6 (Amnesty International, Secret Policeman's Ball etc).

But Cleese, being a prize thickie, thought *his* view of the deep state (so-called post empire 'britishness') was the *point* of the british deep state, but it never was. So Cleese feels 'betrayed'.

Cleese (and the 'Goodies' and other late 60s, early 70s BBC 'comedians') were part of the neo-racist movement that gave us the NF (national front- MI5's 'racist' nationalistic movement designed to help usher Thatcher (or someone like her) into power). Cleese and his comic mates loved to scream the n-word, and portray 'black' Humans as literal spear chuckers (go watch Cleese's 'meaning of life').

The irony is that at the time, immigrants into the UK were *more* british than the british themselves, coming from ex-empire nations that worshipped everything british. They caused almost zero problems, save for the usual socio-economic ones when they were pitted against the existant working classes, to bring down wages and raise rents (read London's 'people of the abyss' for an early description of this mechanism).

Today, for various reasons, London does not seem like the London Cleese remembers and loves. And he isn't wrong. But *London* has always been the part of Britain that has this character- rapidly changing for purely economic reasons. Remember this city was once the largest in the world, and *not* cos it was full of native brits.

What Cleese is really saying is *not* that London has changed but that other major cities in the UK have changed, and thanks to the policies of the alt-left, led by Tony Blair, this is absolutely true. Millions of economic migrants from E Europe have poured into the UK, and millions of primitive muslims from every islamic hell-hole. Many parts of the UK are now *second world*- or in other words have regressed back to conditions last seen in the 1950s in the worst cities, or maybe even pre-ww2 or even pre-ww1 in better industrial cities.

Civic corruption in these cities has exploded. Local councillors are now muslims - but placemen for the local muslim gangsters that rule over the lives of so many ordinary muslims. So slum landlord policies, not seen since the early 1960s, are now back in force in the UK. The occupancy of houses has now often *quadrupled*- indeed many see shift sleeping.

The degeneration of the UK has *zero* benefit in the eyes of people like Cleese, but this is true. And at the same time 'britishness'- the character of the UK- has been radically changed to the point where 'white' culture is seen as a moral crime. The leaders of the working class muslims truly think they have a chance to take over the UK, and turn it into another wahhabi satellite of Saudi Arabia. Of course this is a nonsense- but a nonsense the british deep state exploit to create growing muslim power, and general social divisions.

Ordinary brits truly cannot get their heads around what is happening or why. Their kids, brainwashed at Blair's 'academy schools', are told to solve the mental problem by going full r-tard, in other words embracing the madness by claiming the madness is really the most enlightened moral policy.

Meanwhile the british deep state is progressing plans to murder *millions* of muslims in Iran. Which is the kind of deep state atrocity Cleese could really get behind if he were bright enough to track the real agenda.

Having witnessed Britain go from there to here, I can state that here is a terrible place, but at the same time there wasn't an ideal place either. Don't get me wrong, the past needed improving, but the chaos we have today is horrifying.

No britian is *not* a land of mass stabbings and mass rapes by immigrants- uncontrolled immigration brings the expected associated patterns of crimes, and that is certainly degrading, but not the real point. The problem is that britian is being changed and degraded and regressed in a project that benefits no-one who intends to spend a long term future in the nation. Even the most primitive muslims that now flood britain do *not* want britain to become a mirror of the sh-tholes they escaped from in the first place. Yet their vile islamic leaders need to replicate the sh-thole conditions to keep control of 'their' people. If the muslims upgraded and integrated, they would no longer be an easily manipualted political bloc.

Britain is doomed for one reason. Because monsters rule- and the opponents of the monsters (at the level that could defeat the monsters) have all vanished. Tony Blair finished this satanic project. His people are now in power in every key part of the UK. And like the nazis when they took power in Germany, their first act was to exterminate all power mechanisms of their potential opponents.

Every ordinary brit- including the recent immigrants, think the actions of the monsters who rule are *insane*. But it does not matter when the monsters are beyond challenge. Unlike the USA, there is no attempt in Britain to even pretend the government tries to work for the benefit of the people.

Britain has a classic hyper authoritarian fascist ruling structure- but this structure has many heads- Labour, Liberal, Conservative and even the Brexit Party. Each head has a fabian/blairite power bloc at top. So all the heads merely sprout from the same alt-left/fabian/blairite body.

Cleese and his vile oxbridge/MI5/BBC chums all once felt *they* were the face of fabian britian- never really understanding the true fabian agenda. Orwell warned against this type of british fabian-loving chump, and how they'd usher in fascist authotarian rule into Britain - which has now happened.
 

Clear

Member
Feb 2, 2009
8,718
1,582
980
John Cleese is deep state- at least an associate of the people who run the deep state in the UK. Cleese is oxbridge and BBC, and has always been associated with MI5/MI6 (Amnesty International, Secret Policeman's Ball etc).

But Cleese, being a prize thickie, thought *his* view of the deep state (so-called post empire 'britishness') was the *point* of the british deep state, but it never was. So Cleese feels 'betrayed'.

Cleese (and the 'Goodies' and other late 60s, early 70s BBC 'comedians') were part of the neo-racist movement that gave us the NF (national front- MI5's 'racist' nationalistic movement designed to help usher Thatcher (or someone like her) into power). Cleese and his comic mates loved to scream the n-word, and portray 'black' Humans as literal spear chuckers (go watch Cleese's 'meaning of life').

The irony is that at the time, immigrants into the UK were *more* british than the british themselves, coming from ex-empire nations that worshipped everything british. They caused almost zero problems, save for the usual socio-economic ones when they were pitted against the existant working classes, to bring down wages and raise rents (read London's 'people of the abyss' for an early description of this mechanism).

Today, for various reasons, London does not seem like the London Cleese remembers and loves. And he isn't wrong. But *London* has always been the part of Britain that has this character- rapidly changing for purely economic reasons. Remember this city was once the largest in the world, and *not* cos it was full of native brits.

What Cleese is really saying is *not* that London has changed but that other major cities in the UK have changed, and thanks to the policies of the alt-left, led by Tony Blair, this is absolutely true. Millions of economic migrants from E Europe have poured into the UK, and millions of primitive muslims from every islamic hell-hole. Many parts of the UK are now *second world*- or in other words have regressed back to conditions last seen in the 1950s in the worst cities, or maybe even pre-ww2 or even pre-ww1 in better industrial cities.

Civic corruption in these cities has exploded. Local councillors are now muslims - but placemen for the local muslim gangsters that rule over the lives of so many ordinary muslims. So slum landlord policies, not seen since the early 1960s, are now back in force in the UK. The occupancy of houses has now often *quadrupled*- indeed many see shift sleeping.

The degeneration of the UK has *zero* benefit in the eyes of people like Cleese, but this is true. And at the same time 'britishness'- the character of the UK- has been radically changed to the point where 'white' culture is seen as a moral crime. The leaders of the working class muslims truly think they have a chance to take over the UK, and turn it into another wahhabi satellite of Saudi Arabia. Of course this is a nonsense- but a nonsense the british deep state exploit to create growing muslim power, and general social divisions.

Ordinary brits truly cannot get their heads around what is happening or why. Their kids, brainwashed at Blair's 'academy schools', are told to solve the mental problem by going full r-tard, in other words embracing the madness by claiming the madness is really the most enlightened moral policy.

Meanwhile the british deep state is progressing plans to murder *millions* of muslims in Iran. Which is the kind of deep state atrocity Cleese could really get behind if he were bright enough to track the real agenda.

Having witnessed Britain go from there to here, I can state that here is a terrible place, but at the same time there wasn't an ideal place either. Don't get me wrong, the past needed improving, but the chaos we have today is horrifying.

No britian is *not* a land of mass stabbings and mass rapes by immigrants- uncontrolled immigration brings the expected associated patterns of crimes, and that is certainly degrading, but not the real point. The problem is that britian is being changed and degraded and regressed in a project that benefits no-one who intends to spend a long term future in the nation. Even the most primitive muslims that now flood britain do *not* want britain to become a mirror of the sh-tholes they escaped from in the first place. Yet their vile islamic leaders need to replicate the sh-thole conditions to keep control of 'their' people. If the muslims upgraded and integrated, they would no longer be an easily manipualted political bloc.

Britain is doomed for one reason. Because monsters rule- and the opponents of the monsters (at the level that could defeat the monsters) have all vanished. Tony Blair finished this satanic project. His people are now in power in every key part of the UK. And like the nazis when they took power in Germany, their first act was to exterminate all power mechanisms of their potential opponents.

Every ordinary brit- including the recent immigrants, think the actions of the monsters who rule are *insane*. But it does not matter when the monsters are beyond challenge. Unlike the USA, there is no attempt in Britain to even pretend the government tries to work for the benefit of the people.

Britain has a classic hyper authoritarian fascist ruling structure- but this structure has many heads- Labour, Liberal, Conservative and even the Brexit Party. Each head has a fabian/blairite power bloc at top. So all the heads merely sprout from the same alt-left/fabian/blairite body.

Cleese and his vile oxbridge/MI5/BBC chums all once felt *they* were the face of fabian britian- never really understanding the true fabian agenda. Orwell warned against this type of british fabian-loving chump, and how they'd usher in fascist authotarian rule into Britain - which has now happened.
Do you actually believe a word you write? I've rarely come across such incoherent and straight-up random political rants!

Seriously, how would you describe your political outlook? Because I'm confused as fuck.
 

Johnny Silver

Member
Oct 24, 2018
60
89
195
Isn't the point of the SJW's and mulitculturalist to make London not "English" anymore, but an amalgamation of various cultures, i.e. a "melting pot".

Why are they up in arms, isn't this the diversity they want? This seems to be the plan all along, erase Englands past/history/culture and replace it with cultures from around the world. I mean England is just known for its colonialism and Churchill was racist too boot, they never accomplished anything else great amrite?
Because they act with a subversive wish and they know and recognize the evil intent in their own actions and narrative. These are not dumb people who are devoid of self reflection, they know full well that they are doing.

They know that if their narrative is recognized openly for what it is it would be seen as an existential risk for the English nation and quickly rejected. Cognitive dissonance and double speak must be applied at all times.

After the suffering that awaits us, these people will be remembered as some of the very worst and ignobly in the entire history of mankind. They won't have peaceful endings, the rage directed at them and their ideals will be too great.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RSB

oagboghi2

Member
Apr 15, 2018
3,424
4,198
375
Do you actually believe a word you write? I've rarely come across such incoherent and straight-up random political rants!

Seriously, how would you describe your political outlook? Because I'm confused as fuck.
They are so random and they come out of nowhere 😂
 

JimmyJones

Member
Mar 19, 2015
1,159
863
465
Hitler killed Europe.

The radical leftist policies that have enabled the current situation gained the ground they have as a backlash to the Nazi's policies, like a rubber band effect.

It's ironic that Neo Nazis hold up Hitler and the Nazis as some great defender of Europe, Hitler, the man who bombed the shit out of Britain and gave the order to utterly demolish Paris when they were pulling out, an order which was too much for the general in charge of the operation and he disobeyed it, who had the Nazis steal and destroy priceless artwork, some defender of European culture.

The Nazis rocked the boat so much that they sank Europe, it just took a long time for the full effects to be felt.
America, the UK and the rest of NATO also ruined Europe when they bombed the shit out of the middle east and left millions of people homeless.

Those that were left homeless have now come flooding into the very countries that bombed them. Shits fucked!
 
Last edited:

merlinevo

Member
Apr 28, 2019
163
278
250
The people on the show are reading this as a race issue instead of a culture issue, which is obvious for anyone watching from the outside. If London was getting invaded by Irish or Scotish people, these idiots wouldn't spew any of the racist argument, in fact they might even join in protesting. These are people who see the devil in everything and they won't be satisfied until the white people go quietly into the night.

The woman in the red blazer is a hodgepodge of stupid. Has a thick african accent while claiming she was born in london and how proud she is to be british, side shave with dreadlocks, seashells in her hair, speaking over everyone else. She sure is making a good case for being against the cultural shift.
 

Boss Mog

Member
Dec 12, 2013
4,511
3,297
715
Nothing wrong with diversity and melting pots as long as the cultures are good cultures.

If all you have are bearded lunatics screaming and chanting death to England and groups of individuals from third world cesspools lighting cars on fire that still squat when they shower or defecate, you probably will have a problem.
The problem is that the leftists say that all cultures are equal and must be respected and if you don't think a barbaric culture is equal to a civilized one then you are a racist neo-nazi.
 

matt404au

Gold Member
Apr 25, 2009
11,861
17,254
1,250
Australia
Why did it become acceptable for immigrants to not assimilate to their host culture? Multiculturalism only works if everyone has the same basic values and wears a veneer of their unique culture.

When in Rome, do as the romans. Dont act like barbarians.
That’s not multiculturalism then — it’s multiracialism.
 

matt404au

Gold Member
Apr 25, 2009
11,861
17,254
1,250
Australia
The people on the show are reading this as a race issue instead of a culture issue, which is obvious for anyone watching from the outside. If London was getting invaded by Irish or Scotish people, these idiots wouldn't spew any of the racist argument, in fact they might even join in protesting. These are people who see the devil in everything and they won't be satisfied until the white people go quietly into the night.

The woman in the red blazer is a hodgepodge of stupid. Has a thick african accent while claiming she was born in london and how proud she is to be british, side shave with dreadlocks, seashells in her hair, speaking over everyone else. She sure is making a good case for being against the cultural shift.
The woman and the hosts were. The Russian guy and Monty Panesar weren’t.

But you’re right — it’s a matter of culture, not race. I’ve said ad nauseam on GAF that culture and race are not the same thing and I feel that the panel would’ve gone a lot better if everyone understood the distinction. Race is biologically evolved (nature) whereas culture is socially evolved (nurture). A boy born in England to Ghanaian immigrants will not grow up to be culturally Ghanaian. Case in point: Idris Elba.

Immigration without integration is invasion. A nation cannot sustain multiple cultures of similar political clout. However, I believe that it can sustain multiple races if they are united under a dominant majority culture, which is what the Russian guy seemed to be hinting at before the loudmouthed woman shouted him down with cries of racism and bigotry.
 

Link1110

Member
Jan 20, 2005
7,400
67
1,415
The Romans founded London in 50 AD. Perhaps people would take Mr Cleese more seriously if he wasn't currently living in Nevis.
He wants an ENGLISH city. He'd write "Romans go home." And hed write it in Latin with no mistake! None of that "the people called Romans they go toward the house" business.
 

Ke0

Member
Aug 10, 2012
2,155
540
530
Reading, Berkshire
Always weird seeing Americans talk bad about multiculturalism when they've been embracing it since what? 1776? Or whenever it was when they first decided non UK white Europeans could move there. The entire fabric of US' culture is the amalgamation of a bunch of other cultures.

The woman and the hosts were. The Russian guy and Monty Panesar weren’t.

But you’re right — it’s a matter of culture, not race. I’ve said ad nauseam on GAF that culture and race are not the same thing and I feel that the panel would’ve gone a lot better if everyone understood the distinction. Race is biologically evolved (nature) whereas culture is socially evolved (nurture). A boy born in England to Ghanaian immigrants will not grow up to be culturally Ghanaian. Case in point: Idris Elba.

Immigration without integration is invasion. A nation cannot sustain multiple cultures of similar political clout. However, I believe that it can sustain multiple races if they are united under a dominant majority culture, which is what the Russian guy seemed to be hinting at before the loudmouthed woman shouted him down with cries of racism and bigotry.
Idris Elba can still speak his native tongue and grew up in a house with Ghanian customs. But I get your point, sadly most people don't accept that. The offsprings of immigrants will slowly integrate into a society whether it be the son/daughter or grandson/granddaughter. Integration takes time and the lot of people are impatient.
 
Last edited:

appaws

Gold Member
Jan 31, 2008
2,503
1,023
1,195
Taylorsville, Ky!
Always weird seeing Americans talk bad about multiculturalism when they've been embracing it since what? 1776? Or whenever it was when they first decided non UK white Europeans could move there. The entire fabric of US' culture is the amalgamation of a bunch of other cultures.
Nope. You really misunderstand Americans. America was (roughly) 90% white until the passage of the 1965 Immigration law. The United States was understood by the founders as an outpost of English culture in North America. And then, yes, that view was expanded to other Europeans under the insane demand for labor of the 19th Century. A distinctive American nationality grew from the mixing of those European people who came in.

But the American people were never asked, and would never have agreed to throwing open the floodgates of third-world immigration the way the elites decided to in 1965. Americans never wanted this to change. But the Chamber of Commerce Republicans wanted cheap serfs, and the Democrats wanted a permanent underclass of welfare leeches.

Immigration without integration is invasion. A nation cannot sustain multiple cultures of similar political clout. However, I believe that it can sustain multiple races if they are united under a dominant majority culture, which is what the Russian guy seemed to be hinting at before the loudmouthed woman shouted him down with cries of racism and bigotry.
I don't think you are completely wrong, but the dominant group has to have an incredibly significant numerical advantage. Again, perhaps pre-1965 America is a case in point. Maybe a minority group can live well in enclaves alongside the dominant group, but I have my doubts about them joining the "nation." African Americans remain their own nation and have never truly integrated, and I would suggest that non-British people continuing to crowd into London will also not assimilate. London cannot be what it was, and Cleese was right.
 
Last edited:

CDiggity

Member
Jan 3, 2014
1,118
127
390
Anecdote time, I was talking with my friend about this and I joked "Of course London is an English city, it's in England", and my friend responded "No don't say that, it is what the leavers and nationalists say, London is a global city."

Seems like catch-22 where if you say London is/isn't English you will get labeled by the same people as intolerant.
 

Kazza

Member
Oct 6, 2018
1,083
1,335
560
This nuance and balanced article isn't too long and is well worth a read:


For those with little time can take a look at the following two graphs:






Although the second shows that the majority of Londoners are still UK-born, that graph ends in 2011, and I suspect that foreign-born may have eclipsed it by now.
 

HenkDV

Member
Aug 11, 2018
701
557
315
John Cleese is deep state- at least an associate of the people who run the deep state in the UK. Cleese is oxbridge and BBC, and has always been associated with MI5/MI6 (Amnesty International, Secret Policeman's Ball etc).

But Cleese, being a prize thickie, thought *his* view of the deep state (so-called post empire 'britishness') was the *point* of the british deep state, but it never was. So Cleese feels 'betrayed'.

Cleese (and the 'Goodies' and other late 60s, early 70s BBC 'comedians') were part of the neo-racist movement that gave us the NF (national front- MI5's 'racist' nationalistic movement designed to help usher Thatcher (or someone like her) into power). Cleese and his comic mates loved to scream the n-word, and portray 'black' Humans as literal spear chuckers (go watch Cleese's 'meaning of life').

The irony is that at the time, immigrants into the UK were *more* british than the british themselves, coming from ex-empire nations that worshipped everything british. They caused almost zero problems, save for the usual socio-economic ones when they were pitted against the existant working classes, to bring down wages and raise rents (read London's 'people of the abyss' for an early description of this mechanism).

Today, for various reasons, London does not seem like the London Cleese remembers and loves. And he isn't wrong. But *London* has always been the part of Britain that has this character- rapidly changing for purely economic reasons. Remember this city was once the largest in the world, and *not* cos it was full of native brits.

What Cleese is really saying is *not* that London has changed but that other major cities in the UK have changed, and thanks to the policies of the alt-left, led by Tony Blair, this is absolutely true. Millions of economic migrants from E Europe have poured into the UK, and millions of primitive muslims from every islamic hell-hole. Many parts of the UK are now *second world*- or in other words have regressed back to conditions last seen in the 1950s in the worst cities, or maybe even pre-ww2 or even pre-ww1 in better industrial cities.

Civic corruption in these cities has exploded. Local councillors are now muslims - but placemen for the local muslim gangsters that rule over the lives of so many ordinary muslims. So slum landlord policies, not seen since the early 1960s, are now back in force in the UK. The occupancy of houses has now often *quadrupled*- indeed many see shift sleeping.

The degeneration of the UK has *zero* benefit in the eyes of people like Cleese, but this is true. And at the same time 'britishness'- the character of the UK- has been radically changed to the point where 'white' culture is seen as a moral crime. The leaders of the working class muslims truly think they have a chance to take over the UK, and turn it into another wahhabi satellite of Saudi Arabia. Of course this is a nonsense- but a nonsense the british deep state exploit to create growing muslim power, and general social divisions.

Ordinary brits truly cannot get their heads around what is happening or why. Their kids, brainwashed at Blair's 'academy schools', are told to solve the mental problem by going full r-tard, in other words embracing the madness by claiming the madness is really the most enlightened moral policy.

Meanwhile the british deep state is progressing plans to murder *millions* of muslims in Iran. Which is the kind of deep state atrocity Cleese could really get behind if he were bright enough to track the real agenda.

Having witnessed Britain go from there to here, I can state that here is a terrible place, but at the same time there wasn't an ideal place either. Don't get me wrong, the past needed improving, but the chaos we have today is horrifying.

No britian is *not* a land of mass stabbings and mass rapes by immigrants- uncontrolled immigration brings the expected associated patterns of crimes, and that is certainly degrading, but not the real point. The problem is that britian is being changed and degraded and regressed in a project that benefits no-one who intends to spend a long term future in the nation. Even the most primitive muslims that now flood britain do *not* want britain to become a mirror of the sh-tholes they escaped from in the first place. Yet their vile islamic leaders need to replicate the sh-thole conditions to keep control of 'their' people. If the muslims upgraded and integrated, they would no longer be an easily manipualted political bloc.

Britain is doomed for one reason. Because monsters rule- and the opponents of the monsters (at the level that could defeat the monsters) have all vanished. Tony Blair finished this satanic project. His people are now in power in every key part of the UK. And like the nazis when they took power in Germany, their first act was to exterminate all power mechanisms of their potential opponents.

Every ordinary brit- including the recent immigrants, think the actions of the monsters who rule are *insane*. But it does not matter when the monsters are beyond challenge. Unlike the USA, there is no attempt in Britain to even pretend the government tries to work for the benefit of the people.

Britain has a classic hyper authoritarian fascist ruling structure- but this structure has many heads- Labour, Liberal, Conservative and even the Brexit Party. Each head has a fabian/blairite power bloc at top. So all the heads merely sprout from the same alt-left/fabian/blairite body.

Cleese and his vile oxbridge/MI5/BBC chums all once felt *they* were the face of fabian britian- never really understanding the true fabian agenda. Orwell warned against this type of british fabian-loving chump, and how they'd usher in fascist authotarian rule into Britain - which has now happened.
okay who's bot is this
 

Ke0

Member
Aug 10, 2012
2,155
540
530
Reading, Berkshire
Nope. You really misunderstand Americans. America was (roughly) 90% white until the passage of the 1965 Immigration law. The United States was understood by the founders as an outpost of English culture in North America. And then, yes, that view was expanded to other Europeans under the insane demand for labor of the 19th Century. A distinctive American nationality grew from the mixing of those European people who came in.

But the American people were never asked, and would never have agreed to throwing open the floodgates of third-world immigration the way the elites decided to in 1965. Americans never wanted this to change. But the Chamber of Commerce Republicans wanted cheap serfs, and the Democrats wanted a permanent underclass of welfare leeches.



I don't think you are completely wrong, but the dominant group has to have an incredibly significant numerical advantage. Again, perhaps pre-1965 America is a case in point. Maybe a minority group can live well in enclaves alongside the dominant group, but I have my doubts about them joining the "nation." African Americans remain their own nation and have never truly integrated, and I would suggest that non-British people continuing to crowd into London will also not assimilate. London cannot be what it was, and Cleese was right.
You're omitting that the Federalists were also against immigration of "white Europeans" because they feared multiculturalism, then your country simply changed the definition of what they considered white. The idea America's culture was a copy of our (England) culture until 1964 is rubbish (And is insulting to European Americans I imagine). Pretty early at every stage of your country's life it had French, Italian, German, Irish, Polish, etc immigrants who poured in a various points in time well before, during, and after the immigration changes of 1965 and many of those groups weren't considered "white" until much later (which made it easier for them to 'assimilate')

You're seeing the samething happen again, America crying about immigrants but no mention of the large amounts of Eastern European immigrants in the Northeast area of the US. I've yet to see a single person on this forum complain about them which is crazy to me
 
Last edited:
  • Fire
Reactions: <+)O Robido O(+>

oagboghi2

Member
Apr 15, 2018
3,424
4,198
375
You're omitting that the Federalists were also against immigration of "white Europeans" because they feared multiculturalism, then your country simply changed the definition of what they considered white. The idea America's culture was a copy of our (England) culture until 1964 is rubbish (And is insulting to European Americans I imagine). Pretty early at every stage of your country's life it had French, Italian, German, Irish, Polish, etc immigrants who poured in a various points in time well before, during, and after the immigration changes of 1965 and many of those groups weren't considered "white" until much later (which made it easier for them to 'assimilate')

You're seeing the samething happen again, America crying about immigrants but no mention of the large amounts of Eastern European immigrants in the Northeast area of the US. I've yet to see a single person on this forum complain about them which is crazy to me
Because they come here legally.
 
  • Thoughtful
Reactions: matt404au

nkarafo

Member
Nov 30, 2012
12,709
1,776
850
I like how these girls try to physically attack the guys with kicks and swings, knowing very well the differences in strength and stamina when it comes to fighting. But thanks to the "patriarchy" making pussy pass a thing they feel safe to do so.