No, but retail Snow Leopard non-upgrade is $169 and comes with iLife '09 and iWork '09, which is still solid.blame space said:Will I be able to upgrade directly from 10.4.11 to Snow Leopard for $29?
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:I just realized I've never opened the Services menu other than the first time I saw it.
No, but retail Snow Leopard non-upgrade is $169 and comes with iLife '09 and iWork '09, which is still solid.
LCfiner said:that's one hell of a post, giga. nice little tweaks to the system.
the day itunes is in cocoa and 64 bit, maybe we'll finally see some major speed boosts from it.
Battlezone said:But see, that gif by itself isn't a problem. I lurk in the NFL and NBA threads all the time, and the only time it slows down for me is if somebody quotes the gif five posts in a row. Maybe I'm just lucky. And maybe I should thank Karakand for not cluttering up College Football-Age with a bunch of gifs!
Futureman said:I'm on a 3 year old iMac, 3 GB of RAM and I don't see how iTunes could be any smoother. I don't watch video though, maybe that's what you mean. My only complaint right now is that the CD covers in coverflow have to be reloaded after maybe an hour or so.
bionic77 said:Updating your iPhone also takes forever on iTunes.
I'm starting to think that we're going to see a big overhaul of iTunes with the Snow Leopard version/iTunes X, but then I figure we aren't going to see that until Apple's September iPod event, which could be before Snow Leopard's release or after, for all we know.LCfiner said:load time could be faster. switching between devices, the store and playlists could be faster. scrolling through thousands of artists in grid mode could be faster.
i mean, i like itunes and it runs OK on my machine. but there is certainly room for speed improvements when navigating around the UI.
I'm 99% sure Cocoa iTunes will be released in September at the iPod event.StrikerObi said:32bit iTunes makes me sad. It's piratically their flagship piece of software and they can't compile a 64 bit version for (Snow) Leopard users? Bullshit.
I might actually use the Services menu now. I know how powerful it is, but it's such a damn mess in it's current form that I don't go near it. Also having Services in context menus is brilliant.
VNZ said:
About time!
99% sure, huh?Unlimited4s said:I'm 99% sure Cocoa iTunes will be released in September at the iPod event.
Just an educated guess .LCfiner said:99% sure, huh?
Educated guess or have you been talking to folks at wwdc?
And I thought Leopard was already pretty snappy with the Intel SSD I put in my Macbook... It's hard to imagine how much snappier it could be with these performance upgrades in Snow Leopard.giga said:It's definitely the fastest Mac OS I've ever used. Who knew rewriting Finder and making it multi-threaded would help so much.
Unlimited4s said:Just an educated guess .
Apple is shouting that they will bring all major apps to Cocoa, and most of the time they show off a new iTunes at the iPod events.
This screenshot is a search:Jasoco said:Question for the people who have the preview:
Is Spotlight fixed? In other words, is Spotlight returned to its former Tiger glory? IN OTHER WORDS, DO SPOTLIGHT SEARCHES ALLOW FOR FOLDER CUSTOMIZATION?
Start a Spotlight search (Command+F), and search for something. Then press Command+J and tell me if they allow you to change the folder options again. Or did they fuck up and keep that part gimped?
In other words, CAN I SORT MY SEARCHES BY DATE CREATED OR LABEL OR FILE SIZE AGAIN?
This is the ONE FEATURE I want back. The most missed feature I have. Tiger had it. It was perfect. Leopard ripped it all out. For no good reason. If this hasn't been returned in Snow Leopard, I will cry myself to sleep every night from now until the end of September.
ckohler said:My iMac at home doesn't have a Core 2 Duo. It was the original Intel iMac and has a Core Duo. Am I going to be missing out on all the 64bit goodness?
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:Good Lord, Snow Leopard is fast. You don't really notice it in normal usage, especially since iTunes is still 32-bit, but when you boot and start up around five programs, they're all nearly instantly available. When you load 3rd-party programs that are still 32-bit, you notice the huge gap in speed.
I'd go for the new Pro. The screens were really the worst part of the old MacBooks, so if the new screen is as good as advertised, it will be a huge improvement. I'm not sure how much RAM the older ones will take, but the new ones will take 8GB, so there's room to upgrade there in the future.arab said:i am at a crossroads, gaf...
$1000 for a refurbished 13 inch 2 ghz unibody macbook
or
$1200 for a new 13 inch 2.23 ghz pro
or
$1200 for a used 13 inch 2.4 ghz macbook with 320gb and 4 gb of ram and 3 years apple care
i'm leaning towards the last one
impirius said:I'd go for the new Pro. The screens were really the worst part of the old MacBooks, so if the new screen is as good as advertised, it will be a huge improvement. I'm not sure how much RAM the older ones will take, but the new ones will take 8GB, so there's room to upgrade there in the future.
impirius said:I'd go for the new Pro. The screens were really the worst part of the old MacBooks, so if the new screen is as good as advertised, it will be a huge improvement. I'm not sure how much RAM the older ones will take, but the new ones will take 8GB, so there's room to upgrade there in the future.
If you know how to open a computer and replace memory and hard drives yourself, it isn't. Get the cheaper one.ThePeacemaker02 said:I don't know if it would be worth it to spend the extra 300 for the extra stuff.
No, those were random people that got lucky and got the updated Pro screens before it was official.arab said:i thought they fixed the screens in the macbook recently...all i know is that the macbook itself was manufactured in march of 09.
ckohler said:My iMac at home doesn't have a Core 2 Duo. It was the original Intel iMac and has a Core Duo. Am I going to be missing out on all the 64bit goodness?
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:Does anyone have any experience with how long it takes for apple to get in their new ipod touches? I talked to the woman at the apple store and she said they won't necessarily have any new ones since they have to run out of the old ones before they get the ones with 3.0... Does it usually take a while? Because if it does I might as well get my macbook tomorrow instead of waiting until wednesday for 3.0 to come out.
Edit: Also, have people seen the new pros and stuff in the stores already? I forgot to ask when I was on the phone.
I didn't know I wanted that feature but that's SO damn useful.giga said:You can delay the unlock screen after sleep/screensaver:
quadriplegicjon said:a guy on here said he has a dev copy of 10.6 on his core duo macbook.. and he reports a huge speed boost as well.. so even without the 64bit cpu, you should get a nice boost.
September is the ipod event.. so probably then. i don't see why they wouldnt update them when the iphones just were.. and usually ipods are released the next day after they are announced...
oh, and the free ipod touch deal is probably there to get rid of inventory for the new ones coming out.. i doubt the deal will still be in effect when they are released.
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:No, I mean the one that ships with 3.0 not the next revision.
If you get one after the release date, but it doesn't have the 3.0 firmware, call Apple and they are usually understanding.Zaraki_Kenpachi said:No, I mean the one that ships with 3.0 not the next revision.