• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

GameStop (circa May 27th): NX will have physical media

Optical media still costs pennies to press. Flash is nowhere close.

There are ways for Nintendo to make this not much of an issue for third parties if they're so inclined.

I'm not "Team Cartridge" as I don't know if I can see it actually happening, but it's certainly not a completely ludicrous idea either.
 

Thraktor

Member
Why would Nintendo waste money and the potential backing of third parties by going with cartridges in a home console? That is literally still the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

There is still not one pro that outweighs the con of cost, despite what you may think you know.

Modern mask-ROM based game cards (as we're hardly talking about N64 style cartridges here) would have the following advantages:

- Considerably higher sequential read speeds than discs, and matching (or potentially exceeding) HDD sequential reads
- Several orders of magnitude higher non-sequential read speeds than either discs or HDDs
- Capacity at least matching BD-ROM, probably exceeding BD-XL in the long run
- Game card slot is a far cheaper component than a Blu-Ray drive
- Removing the disc drive means a much smaller console, which reduces logistical costs considerably
- Removing the disc drive means removing the most common point of failure in the console, reducing warranty cost
- Games can be run directly off the game card, without mandatory installs
- No mandatory installs means no need for a large capacity hard-drive, and a lower-capacity, but faster, pool of flash memory can be used instead
- No HDD means a smaller console, and further reduced logistical costs
- No HDD means removing the second most common point of failure, so more reduced warranty costs
- If both home console and handheld share the same library, customer confusion is reduced considerably if they use the same game media
- If both home console and handheld share the same library, logistical costs and inventory risk are heavily reduced by shipping a single version of the game rather than two separate versions

Based on the trajectory of game card capacity from DS and 3DS, 128GB cards should be technically feasible in 2017 (although, presumably, most or all games would ship on much smaller cards). From a technological perspective, game cards are superior to discs in every single way. The only negative against them is the cost of the media itself, but unless someone here works for Nintendo or Macronix, none of us have the slightest idea what that cost would be, and it's entirely possible that the positives above (including substantial savings on the console itself) could make it a sensible financial decision, even accounting for a need to part-subsidise the cards for third parties.
 

tronic307

Member
Yeah, carts would be cool, and it's almost a given on a handheld... but, realistically speaking, why would they use carts on a home console when equivalent size Blu-ray discs are a lot cheaper?

Xenoblade Chronicles X is like ~22 GB on Wii U. Zelda BotW will surely be bigger or around that. They would need to use a 32GB+ cart to store a game that size. That surely would be more expensive than a double layered Blu-ray, right? Max cart size they've used on 3DS is 4GB... 8 times that to store a game like Zelda BotW sounds a lot to me (unless they use a crazy compression system).

Don't get me wrong, I would love to see carts instead of discs again on a home console, but I see it very complicated.
32GB would be enough; most Nintendo games are far smaller. If Nintendo charges $40 for 4GB 3DS carts, they could surely charge $60 for 32-64GB. Keep in mind that 3DS card tech is over 5 years old at this point so Nintendo could well make the new tech NX cards $50 to split the difference between current handheld and console prices yet still turn a profit. A discless console would also help cut manufacturing, repair, and shipping costs while also serving Nintendo's low power consumption goals. More resources could be diverted to processing power and still profit on hardware sales.
 

_Ryo_

Member
Spoiler: everything will be in the form of Amiibos

Would actually be cool. Much cooler than buying amiibo for in game items... as basically physical DLC.

A figurine in every purchase. But space to placd to put em... that is another question. Haha
 
Modern mask-ROM based game cards (as we're hardly talking about N64 style cartridges here) would have the following advantages:

- Considerably higher sequential read speeds than discs, and matching (or potentially exceeding) HDD sequential reads
- Several orders of magnitude higher non-sequential read speeds than either discs or HDDs
- Capacity at least matching BD-ROM, probably exceeding BD-XL in the long run
- Game card slot is a far cheaper component than a Blu-Ray drive
- Removing the disc drive means a much smaller console, which reduces logistical costs considerably
- Removing the disc drive means removing the most common point of failure in the console, reducing warranty cost
- Games can be run directly off the game card, without mandatory installs
- No mandatory installs means no need for a large capacity hard-drive, and a lower-capacity, but faster, pool of flash memory can be used instead
- No HDD means a smaller console, and further reduced logistical costs
- No HDD means removing the second most common point of failure, so more reduced warranty costs
- If both home console and handheld share the same library, customer confusion is reduced considerably if they use the same game media
- If both home console and handheld share the same library, logistical costs and inventory risk are heavily reduced by shipping a single version of the game rather than two separate versions

Based on the trajectory of game card capacity from DS and 3DS, 128GB cards should be technically feasible in 2017 (although, presumably, most or all games would ship on much smaller cards). From a technological perspective, game cards are superior to discs in every single way. The only negative against them is the cost of the media itself, but unless someone here works for Nintendo or Macronix, none of us have the slightest idea what that cost would be, and it's entirely possible that the positives above (including substantial savings on the console itself) could make it a sensible financial decision, even accounting for a need to part-subsidise the cards for third parties.

That's all pretty interesting, thanks. We know Nintendo is not a company to ball from risks, so it wouldn't be wild of them to go with cartridges. I guess GameStop is cool wth whatever so long as they keep making money from it, natch.
 

10k

Banned
download any games on your phone lately
Apples and oranges. Your phone is with you everywhere you go, doesn't have 50GB installs, and is seen as more of a device that plays some games. Nobody buys a phone as a dedicated gaming device.

Digital only consoles are likely the future but it will be a disaster until the retailer margins and shipping and manufacturing costs are taken out of the digital prices.
 
Apples and oranges. Your phone is with you everywhere you go, doesn't have 50GB installs, and is seen as more of a device that plays some games. Nobody buys a phone as a dedicated gaming device.

Digital only consoles are likely the future but it will be a disaster until the retailer margins and shipping and manufacturing costs are taken out of the digital prices.

Did I say there was no difference at all?

They are, in principle, digital-only devices that play games. You can add all the qualifiers you want, that's what they are, and people use them in that way while simultaneously decrying the idea of digital-only anything gaming.
 
Nintendo sell download codes for games on little eShop style cards in Japan at retail. They probably could push a digital only console down the track some time in the future without it being more expensive. Obviously, there would have to be something in it for second hand game retailers.
 

10k

Banned
Did I say there was no difference at all?

They are, in principle, digital-only devices that play games. You can add all the qualifiers you want, that's what they are, and people use them in that way while simultaneously decrying the idea of digital-only anything gaming.
I think he was decrying consoles as digital only devices being a disaster to him.
Consoles released in 2017 with UHD UMD
Nooooooo
 

Calm Mind

Member
Modern mask-ROM based game cards (as we're hardly talking about N64 style cartridges here) would have the following advantages:

- Considerably higher sequential read speeds than discs, and matching (or potentially exceeding) HDD sequential reads
- Several orders of magnitude higher non-sequential read speeds than either discs or HDDs
- Capacity at least matching BD-ROM, probably exceeding BD-XL in the long run
- Game card slot is a far cheaper component than a Blu-Ray drive
- Removing the disc drive means a much smaller console, which reduces logistical costs considerably
- Removing the disc drive means removing the most common point of failure in the console, reducing warranty cost
- Games can be run directly off the game card, without mandatory installs
- No mandatory installs means no need for a large capacity hard-drive, and a lower-capacity, but faster, pool of flash memory can be used instead
- No HDD means a smaller console, and further reduced logistical costs
- No HDD means removing the second most common point of failure, so more reduced warranty costs
- If both home console and handheld share the same library, customer confusion is reduced considerably if they use the same game media
- If both home console and handheld share the same library, logistical costs and inventory risk are heavily reduced by shipping a single version of the game rather than two separate versions

Based on the trajectory of game card capacity from DS and 3DS, 128GB cards should be technically feasible in 2017 (although, presumably, most or all games would ship on much smaller cards). From a technological perspective, game cards are superior to discs in every single way. The only negative against them is the cost of the media itself, but unless someone here works for Nintendo or Macronix, none of us have the slightest idea what that cost would be, and it's entirely possible that the positives above (including substantial savings on the console itself) could make it a sensible financial decision, even accounting for a need to part-subsidise the cards for third parties.

Like a voice of reason among the cacophony.
 

NESpowerhouse

Perhaps he's wondering why someone would shoot a man before throwing him out of a plane.
Would a 50GB cartridge be more or less expensive to produce than a 50GB Blu-ray disc?
 

10k

Banned
Modern mask-ROM based game cards (as we're hardly talking about N64 style cartridges here) would have the following advantages:

- Considerably higher sequential read speeds than discs, and matching (or potentially exceeding) HDD sequential reads
- Several orders of magnitude higher non-sequential read speeds than either discs or HDDs
- Capacity at least matching BD-ROM, probably exceeding BD-XL in the long run
- Game card slot is a far cheaper component than a Blu-Ray drive
- Removing the disc drive means a much smaller console, which reduces logistical costs considerably
- Removing the disc drive means removing the most common point of failure in the console, reducing warranty cost
- Games can be run directly off the game card, without mandatory installs
- No mandatory installs means no need for a large capacity hard-drive, and a lower-capacity, but faster, pool of flash memory can be used instead
- No HDD means a smaller console, and further reduced logistical costs
- No HDD means removing the second most common point of failure, so more reduced warranty costs
- If both home console and handheld share the same library, customer confusion is reduced considerably if they use the same game media
- If both home console and handheld share the same library, logistical costs and inventory risk are heavily reduced by shipping a single version of the game rather than two separate versions

Based on the trajectory of game card capacity from DS and 3DS, 128GB cards should be technically feasible in 2017 (although, presumably, most or all games would ship on much smaller cards). From a technological perspective, game cards are superior to discs in every single way. The only negative against them is the cost of the media itself, but unless someone here works for Nintendo or Macronix, none of us have the slightest idea what that cost would be, and it's entirely possible that the positives above (including substantial savings on the console itself) could make it a sensible financial decision, even accounting for a need to part-subsidise the cards for third parties.
Nobody's makes cartridges sound sexier and more logical than you, Thraktor. <3
 
A digital-only Nintendo console would be a hard sell for even the most die-hard Nintendo fans imo. I don't think anyone ever expected there to be no physical media.
 

Hilarion

Member
3DS-style carts and a 250 GB SDD in the console could make the smallest and quietest home console ever, and we all know how much Nintendo loves small and quiet home consoles.
 

Calm Mind

Member
3DS-style carts and a 250 GB SDD in the console could make the smallest and quietest home console ever, and we all know how much Nintendo loves small and quiet home consoles.

You are deluding yourself if you think Nintendo is doing internal storage. Even internal power is off the table.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
You are deluding yourself if you think Nintendo is doing internal storage. Even internal power is off the table.

Internals in general. It's a cloud system. No controller even.
 

LewieP

Member
Strong post by Thraktor.

I'd also say that if NX is to be Nintendo's one true platform going forward, where all future Nintendo devices will share this library, it makes even more sense long into the future that it does today.

The main negative of the increased unit cost will decrease over time, whereas the disadvantages of disc based media will only become more and more significant.

Even if Nintendo do have to bite the bullet on increased costs in the short term, it's entirely feasible that they'd reap lots of benefits long into the future.

Suggesting discs is the only feasible option is fairly backward thinking. Whilst it might make sense today, it doesn't necessarily make sense for the future.
 

Thraktor

Member
Nobody's makes cartridges sound sexier and more logical than you, Thraktor. <3

Oh, cartridges are pretty sexy without me.

Seriously, though, all I was saying is that there are positives to using game cards, but it's not a clear cut case in either direction. We only know (or, more accurately, can make lightly educated guesses at) one side of the equation, and we have no idea what the other side (the cost) is. Without that it's impossible to say with any degree of confidence whether game cards or discs would be the more sensible route.
 

10k

Banned
Oh, cartridges are pretty sexy without me.

Seriously, though, all I was saying is that there are positives to using game cards, but it's not a clear cut case in either direction. We only know (or, more accurately, can make lightly educated guesses at) one side of the equation, and we have no idea what the other side (the cost) is. Without that it's impossible to say with any degree of confidence whether game cards or discs would be the more sensible route.
Discs are too fragile to me. Always hated them. Especially with young relatives getting their hands on them when you're not home. I feel more comfortable with carts.

Another advantage is not needed huge game cases to contain the carts, so less shelf space used, which allows retailers to show more game titles on the shelf.
 

Schnozberry

Member
Oh, cartridges are pretty sexy without me.

Seriously, though, all I was saying is that there are positives to using game cards, but it's not a clear cut case in either direction. We only know (or, more accurately, can make lightly educated guesses at) one side of the equation, and we have no idea what the other side (the cost) is. Without that it's impossible to say with any degree of confidence whether game cards or discs would be the more sensible route.

Macronix seems like they are expecting quite a bit of business from Nintendo in their 4th Quarter this year. Enough that they expect it to be profitable, where it is usually their slowest quarter. They are also moving forward with their die shrink from 75nm NOR Flash used in the 3DS to a newer 32nm process, which would speed up the climb up to larger capacities.

Whether they are selling Nintendo cartridges or flash for some other reason is unknown, but there is enough smoke there for speculation.
 

10k

Banned
Macronix seems like they are expecting quite a bit of business from Nintendo in their 4th Quarter this year. Enough that they expect it to be profitable, where it is usually their slowest quarter. They are also moving forward with their die shrink from 75nm NOR Flash used in the 3DS to a newer 32nm process, which would speed up the climb up to larger capacities.

Whether they are selling Nintendo cartridges or flash for some other reason is unknown, but there is enough smoke there for speculation.
Yeah. Some people say its just them beefing up 3DS carts for the holidays and Pokémon and stuff.

I don't know much about macronix though. It certainly fits within the NX timeline.
 

Schnozberry

Member
Yeah. Some people say its just them beefing up 3DS carts for the holidays and Pokémon and stuff.

I don't know much about macronix though. It certainly fits within the NX timeline.

They specifically mention new hardware in their statements about the 4th Quarter. Whether that means making carts or some other internal ROM is a question mark.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
If it's cartridges you can say goodbye to the third party renaissance.

Possibly.

Square, Capcom, Sega, Atlus, et al still supported 3DS with cartridges.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
Yeah. Some people say its just them beefing up 3DS carts for the holidays and Pokémon and stuff.

I don't know much about macronix though. It certainly fits within the NX timeline.
Didn't they say 4th Quarter of the fiscal year, which is supposed to be around the launch of the NX Platform?
 
Modern mask-ROM based game cards (as we're hardly talking about N64 style cartridges here) would have the following advantages:

- Considerably higher sequential read speeds than discs, and matching (or potentially exceeding) HDD sequential reads
- Several orders of magnitude higher non-sequential read speeds than either discs or HDDs
- Capacity at least matching BD-ROM, probably exceeding BD-XL in the long run
- Game card slot is a far cheaper component than a Blu-Ray drive
- Removing the disc drive means a much smaller console, which reduces logistical costs considerably
- Removing the disc drive means removing the most common point of failure in the console, reducing warranty cost
- Games can be run directly off the game card, without mandatory installs
- No mandatory installs means no need for a large capacity hard-drive, and a lower-capacity, but faster, pool of flash memory can be used instead
- No HDD means a smaller console, and further reduced logistical costs
- No HDD means removing the second most common point of failure, so more reduced warranty costs
- If both home console and handheld share the same library, customer confusion is reduced considerably if they use the same game media
- If both home console and handheld share the same library, logistical costs and inventory risk are heavily reduced by shipping a single version of the game rather than two separate versions

Based on the trajectory of game card capacity from DS and 3DS, 128GB cards should be technically feasible in 2017 (although, presumably, most or all games would ship on much smaller cards). From a technological perspective, game cards are superior to discs in every single way. The only negative against them is the cost of the media itself, but unless someone here works for Nintendo or Macronix, none of us have the slightest idea what that cost would be, and it's entirely possible that the positives above (including substantial savings on the console itself) could make it a sensible financial decision, even accounting for a need to part-subsidise the cards for third parties.

They could also save a lot of shipping/packaging money by making the game cases a lot smaller, seeing as it's not going to have a cd in and that they don't print manuals anymore. 3DS sized or smaller.
 

geordiemp

Member
Based on what, exactly? Cartridges in 2017 != cartridges in 1996.

Most games third party lets say game X is 45 GB. Game C has a 15 GB day 1 patch.

That 15 GB must replace the original code on the disk. So game loads from disk to Hard drive, and then patch overwrites the hard drive data.

Note this could work on Cartridge as well, but only if each cartridge just loads to a hard drive otherwise he is right, say goodbye to any western third party support.

Remember, games on Ps4 play from Hard drive, games dont run from Blu ray, the disk just saves you downloading allot of the game.
 

Oregano

Member
Most games third party lets say game X is 45 GB. Game C has a 15 GB day 1 patch.

That 15 GB must replace the original code on the disk. So game loads from disk to Hard drive, and then patch overwrites the hard drive data.

Note this could work on Cartridge as well, but only if each cartridge just loads to a hard drive otherwise he is right, say goodbye to any western third party support.

That isn't how it works. PS3, 360, Wii U, Vita and 3DS handle patches just fine without installing. The latter two with cartridges already.
 
Most games third party lets say game X is 45 GB. Game C has a 15 GB day 1 patch.

That 15 GB must replace the original code on the disk. So game loads from disk to Hard drive, and then patch overwrites the hard drive data.

Note this could work on Cartridge as well, but only if each cartridge just loads to a hard drive otherwise he is right, say goodbye to any western third party support.

The 3DS supports patching with carts but without a hard drive.
 

geordiemp

Member
The 3DS supports patching with carts but without a hard drive.

Oh I agree, I remember small patches on 360 (cant remember my Wii lol) and games running from disk. Thats when Patch was a ...patch...

But this gen, those 15 GB patches, different ball game, they are almost re download the whole bloody game. God I have downloaded 30 GB patches...lol

Only way that works is if games run from HD otherwise its no major western support imo.
 

LordOfChaos

Member
Would cartridges still use batteries like old Gameboy ones, that would sometimes die and I think the data would be lost?

I'm assuming no, as rewritable memory holds it's own without that these days, i.e SD cards.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
Based on what, exactly? Cartridges in 2017 != cartridges in 1996.

Licensing, manufacturing costs, storage, manufacturing SCHEDULES and more (what happens when your modern AAA game gets delayed or needs a huge title update on day one - may not be popular but that's the reality in the footprint of today's software). Unless they offer open manufacture - SD cards for example, but then you still have cost and storage to deal with. Not to mention title updates - would they sit on an HDD? In which case why have cartridges if the data has to be read off an HDD anyway? Optical media is much cheaper to print.

And that also means making "versions" of the game based on ROM footprint rather than the "natural" footprint of the game.

All of these can be overcome, but all of them are unattractive to third parties. Nintendo stands to benefit the most from that approach.

Anyway, it's speculation about speculation at this point.
 

Pokemaniac

Member
Most games third party lets say game X is 45 GB. Game C has a 15 GB day 1 patch.

That 15 GB must replace the original code on the disk. So game loads from disk to Hard drive, and then patch overwrites the hard drive data.

Note this could work on Cartridge as well, but only if each cartridge just loads to a hard drive otherwise he is right, say goodbye to any western third party support.

Remember, games on Ps4 play from Hard drive, games dont run from Blu ray, the disk just saves you downloading allot of the game.

Wii U and 3DS already solved this problem without any need for full game installs. Patches contain only the delta, and files in the patch can supersede files on the disc/cartridge.
 
Top Bottom