• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Movies you have seen recently?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Danielsan said:
And mine was.
It was much needed too. After watching the turd that is Alice in Wonderland (Tim Burton) I desperately needed some great movies.

Ha, I felt like after seeing The Secret In Their Eyes. After leaving the theater I got a sudden urge that I hadn't seen a movie that good in probably two years (last time I had that feeling was No Country For Old Men) and I probably won't for awhile.

btw, is Alice In Wonderland even worth watching at all? I have yet to see Charlie and the Coco Factory.
 

Danielsan

Member
DanielPlainview said:
Ha, I felt like after seeing The Secret In Their Eyes. After leaving the theater I got a sudden urge that I hadn't seen a movie that good in probably two years (last time I had that feeling was No Country For Old Men) and I probably won't for awhile.

btw, is Alice In Wonderland even worth watching at all? I have yet to see Charlie and the Coco Factory.
I imediately put it on my too watch list after you posted earlier that it was the best movie you'd seen in the past two years.
Hopefully I'll be able to check it out soon.

Alice in Wonderland isn't worth your time.
I'm no Tim Burton hater and I actually rather enjoyed his take on Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, but Alice almost has not redeeming factors about it.
I may have enjoyed a couple of scenes here and there, but overall it felt like huge incohesive and poorly construed mess.
 

faridmon

Member
Just watched Robin Hood 2010, ugh, not good. very drwan out in many places and the battles weren't epic, except for the first 20 mins. I am a big fan of Russel Crew, but in this movie he wasn't at his best.

Also, i couldn't hear properly because how bloody ambigious they talk. I hate movies like this.
 
only 26 movies left to finish IMDb Top 250 quest. What should I watch next?

Rosemary's Baby (currently watching)
Metropolis (70% done)
The Elephant Man (20% done)
The Manchurian Candidate
Yojimbo
Ben-Hur
Witness for the Prosecution
Les diaboliques
Grave of the Fireflies
Judgment at Nuremberg
Kind Hearts and Coronets
Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans
Nights of Cabiria
The Hustler
Dial M for Murder
Shadow of a Doubt
King Kong
Sleuth
Stalag 17
The African Queen
La Strada
All Quiet On The Western Front
Anatomy of Murder
Spartacus
The Philadelphia Story
My Neighbor Totoro
 

demon

I don't mean to alarm you but you have dogs on your face
cTy5L.jpg


Not bad. I'd give it a 6-7/10 for what it is....a creepy slasher flick. The story is a bit more interesting than average and it has kind of a spooky atmosphere at times, and it's pretty violent. I've read the story and while it's been almost six years, I get the feeling the movie doesn't live up to the book. The plot makes a huge jump at the end and it's kind of like "....uhh........wait..what? Please elaborate por favor?" A few too many cliches too.....I can't count the number of times one of the characters stopped in their tracks and slowly turned around to see the chaser/chasee as though they'd magically sensed his presence". Also too many retarded sweeping and panning CG shots of the trains-- a good example of just because you can doesn't mean you should. Worth a watch, though.
 

HiResDes

Member
DanielPlainview said:
only 26 movies left to finish IMDb Top 250 quest. What should I watch next?

Rosemary's Baby (currently watching)
Metropolis (70% done)
The Elephant Man (20% done)
The Manchurian Candidate
Yojimbo
Ben-Hur
Witness for the Prosecution
Les diaboliques
Grave of the Fireflies
Judgment at Nuremberg
Kind Hearts and Coronets
Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans
Nights of Cabiria
The Hustler
Dial M for Murder
Shadow of a Doubt
King Kong
Sleuth
Stalag 17
The African Queen
La Strada
All Quiet On The Western Front
Anatomy of Murder
Spartacus
The Philadelphia Story
My Neighbor Totoro

I'd watch La Strada.
 
DanielPlainview said:
only 26 movies left to finish IMDb Top 250 quest. What should I watch next?

Rosemary's Baby (currently watching)
Metropolis (70% done)
The Elephant Man (20% done)
The Manchurian Candidate
Yojimbo
Ben-Hur
Witness for the Prosecution
Les diaboliques
Grave of the Fireflies
Judgment at Nuremberg
Kind Hearts and Coronets
Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans
Nights of Cabiria
The Hustler
Dial M for Murder
Shadow of a Doubt
King Kong
Sleuth
Stalag 17
The African Queen
La Strada
All Quiet On The Western Front
Anatomy of Murder
Spartacus
The Philadelphia Story
My Neighbor Totoro

you can't go wrong with any of these. I do recommend finishing Metropolis first, though
 
HiResDes said:
I'd watch La Strada.

nice, thank god a lot of these are on Netflix Watch Instantly or I'd be broke. I just had to cancel my account b/c they wouldn't ship out any of my DVD's for six days and then everywhere I tried to watch instantly it said device had been deactivated. Time to bum off my parent's account.
 

castlegar

Member
DanielPlainview said:
only 26 movies left to finish IMDb Top 250 quest. What should I watch next?

Rosemary's Baby (currently watching)
Metropolis (70% done)
The Elephant Man (20% done)
The Manchurian Candidate
Yojimbo
Ben-Hur
Witness for the Prosecution
Les diaboliques
Grave of the Fireflies
Judgment at Nuremberg
Kind Hearts and Coronets
Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans
Nights of Cabiria
The Hustler
Dial M for Murder
Shadow of a Doubt
King Kong
Sleuth
Stalag 17
The African Queen
La Strada
All Quiet On The Western Front
Anatomy of Murder
Spartacus
The Philadelphia Story
My Neighbor Totoro

.
 

faridmon

Member
DanielPlainview said:
only 26 movies left to finish IMDb Top 250 quest. What should I watch next?

Rosemary's Baby (currently watching)
Metropolis (70% done)
The Elephant Man (20% done)
The Manchurian Candidate
Yojimbo
Ben-Hur
Witness for the Prosecution
Les diaboliques
Grave of the Fireflies
Judgment at Nuremberg
Kind Hearts and Coronets
Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans
Nights of Cabiria
The Hustler
Dial M for Murder
Shadow of a Doubt
King Kong
Sleuth
Stalag 17
The African Queen
La Strada
All Quiet On The Western Front
Anatomy of Murder
Spartacus
The Philadelphia Story
My Neighbor Totoro
Wow, you are a true movie fan.

the only one I watched is Metropolis, and that was really great.
 
I freaking loved Vallhalla Rising, I heard from other people what to expect from the film so I was not surprised or disappointed.

Mads Mikkelsen was just a pure badass, and while Winding-Refn doesn't have the talent of Mallick I think it was a great 'homage'. Really strange film too, and exhausting.
 
faridmon said:
Wow, you are a true movie fan.

the only one I watched is Metropolis, and that was really great.

Ha I started about a month and a half ago and when I added up the list I'd already seen 200 or so. Got halfway through the remainder. Now I have a bit more free time to enjoy the rest!

I highly recommend ICheckMovies.com. Here is my profile, great for keeping track.
 
The Elephant Man, Rosemary's Baby and The Hustler are my favorite of those films.

Spartacus is pretty fun, but you didn't really like Gladiator much soooo...I don't know :lol
 
Discotheque said:
The Elephant Man, Rosemary's Baby and The Hustler are my favorite of those films.

Spartacus is pretty fun, but you didn't really like Gladiator much soooo...I don't know :lol

I do love Kubrick though! Only a few of his I haven't seen.
 
Kubrick's alright for me, there's quite a few directors I like more though. The thing about Spartacus though is that it's not very "Kubricky" at all. It's a really enjoyable epic. But no different from your Gladiators or Bravehearts.
 
Steppenwolf said:
I have send you a friend request. Our profiles are very similar.

Accepted! Yeah, I feel like no one has mastered some of those genre IMDb lists. It's always the same every profile I see. Thriller, Drama, Crime, Mystery, Action, Adventure, Indie all filled up. The rest are low. I guess since they are the most popular genres though, makes sense.
 

Blader

Member
Discotheque said:
Kubrick's alright for me, there's quite a few directors I like more though. The thing about Spartacus though is that it's not very "Kubricky" at all. It's a really enjoyable epic. But no different from your Gladiators or Bravehearts.

Kubrick came onto that movie pretty late in the game.

And personally, I thought Spartacus was pretty shitty.
 
DanielPlainview said:
Accepted! Yeah, I feel like no one has mastered some of those genre IMDb lists. It's always the same every profile I see. Thriller, Drama, Crime, Mystery, Action, Adventure, Indie all filled up. The rest are low. I guess since they are the most popular genres though, makes sense.

Pretty much reflects my taste. Thrillers are my favourite genre, musicals my least favourite.
 

faridmon

Member
DanielPlainview said:
Ha I started about a month and a half ago and when I added up the list I'd already seen 200 or so. Got halfway through the remainder. Now I have a bit more free time to enjoy the rest!

I highly recommend ICheckMovies.com. Here is my profile, great for keeping track.
I have never dedicated my self into the movie industry as i have enough mediums that eats my wallet so badly.
One day though, i will watch as many movie as many posters here.
My favourite movie is still Gone with the Wind :D
 

ymmv

Banned
DanielPlainview said:
only 26 movies left to finish IMDb Top 250 quest. What should I watch next?

The Manchurian Candidate
Yojimbo
Ben-Hur
Witness for the Prosecution
Les diaboliques
Grave of the Fireflies
Judgment at Nuremberg
Kind Hearts and Coronets
Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans
Nights of Cabiria
The Hustler
Dial M for Murder
Shadow of a Doubt
King Kong
Sleuth
Stalag 17
The African Queen
La Strada
All Quiet On The Western Front
Anatomy of Murder
Spartacus
The Philadelphia Story
My Neighbor Totoro

The bolded ones are my favorites, but of course you can't go wrong with any of those.
 

beelzebozo

Jealous Bastard
is anyone else surprised no one gets H.R. GIGER to do more sci-fi/horror designs? or is it just that it's cheaper to rip off the xenomorph? or maybe he's just not interested.

still, seems a shame. . .
 
I saw Cool Hand Luke for the first time yesterday. Paul Newman was such a badass in his day, it's unbelievable. It was quite good, by the way; I enjoyed it much more than the similar One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which is also good in its own way.
 

Timber

Member
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
I saw Cool Hand Luke for the first time yesterday. Paul Newman was such a badass in his day, it's unbelievable. It was quite good, by the way; I enjoyed it much more than the similar One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which is also good in its own way.
Yeah, Cool Hand Luke is great fun. No other movie capitalised on Newman's radiant smile so well. "That Luke smile o' his."


Red Dead Redemption has been eating up most of my time, but I did manage to watch some movies as well these past two weeks.

Histoire(s) du Cinéma (1988-1998)
I got this off Amazon a couple months ago, despite not being very familiar with Godard's post-60s output and being forewarned that it's a bit difficult. The whole concept of it just intrigued me. I held off on watching it because I knew it was comprised of images from other movies, and I wanted to be able to identify as many of them as possible. But I couldn't resist any longer.

Godard basically strips cinema to its basics - the juxtaposition of images and sounds - and builds it up again in his own way. It's a work that details the history of film, often in a non-chronological/non-linear way, as well as details the history of the 20th century as seen thru the lens of the camera. The two chapters made in 1988 are a bit more general than the ones made ten years later, which have more specific themes. In the first chapter, photos of Charlie Chaplin are shown while Godard repeats the words 'le règle du jeu' several times. These kinds of playful combinations are found all over, tho many of them aren't as comprehensible.

I loved watching all 270 minutes of Histoire(s), if only for how many great scenes from great movies rush by very rapidly. It's as fun as it often is indecipherable. It also contains some of the most warmest, most emotionally affecting moments I've seen from Godard. One of its chapter deals with the wide-eyed wonder with which children will stare at images, and posits that in order to get the most of out movies, adults need to do the same thing. My favourite chapter is The Coin of the Absolute, which is in part a reaction to the Bosnian war. Godard goes from that war to WWII, the latter a recurring topic in Histoire(s), then criticises all the dominant cinematic forces in the western world for not having taken up their responsibilities and making escapist fare instead. Then he adds the caveat that there was one country making engaged, important movies after WWII, and the chapter ends with a loving montage of neorealist films set to a sentimental Italian song.

It's really a monumental work, one I'l undoubtedly return to once I've seen more movies. It's difficult to understand all of it tho, especially when you don't know any French. Not all of what's spoken, and hardly anything of what's written, is subtitled, and in light of his recent Film Socialisme i think it's safe to say that this was done intentionally.

Drums Along the Mohawk (1939)
The sentimental quaintness that Ford's movies were prone to is out in full force here. It's a nice story, nicely told and nicely acted. A nice film. Beautifully shot. Some odd casual racism in some places, aimed at native Americans as well as the British. The villian wears an eye patch... an eye patch!

High and Low (1963)
A very special movie in many ways. For one, I loved seeing Mifune in a more modern setting instead of being a crazy, badass, crazily badass or badassily crazy samurai. The performance he puts on here as King Gondo is excellent.
The movie's structure is also special. The first hour takes place entirely in one setting, almost as if it were an adaptation of a play. After that, it opens up, and it becomes a thoroughly gripping police procedural with some interesting subtext. It's a gorgeous looking movie as well. One of Kurosawa's best, visually and otherwise.
 
So here's an interesting (and awesome) double feature I just finished:

M (Fritz Lang, 1931)

Amazing. This was actually my first Fritz Lang film, and it was well worthwhile. For one, all of his settings are pretty much perfectly designed; there was this perfect use of space that was intangible in description but perfectly tangible at every moment in the film. I just about died; it was as though every table was the perfect distance from the wall, for example. In addition, Peter Lorre gives an amazing performance, though for the (sort of) titular character, he has relatively little to do in the plot; his speech at the end was gutwrenching, the despicable nature of his character aside. This movie is great in three simultaneous genres: the police procedural, the serial killer movie, and the anti-Nazi/fascism allegory. I also enjoyed the moments of pure silence in this film; this is a movie where the images often spoke for themselves.

A Clockwork Orange (Stanley Kubrick, 1971)

Further proof of why Kubrick was the master. Amazing in every aspect and still wonderfully creative 40 years later. I like Roger Ebert, but he's crazy for disliking this film. Even if it does not aesthetically appeal to you (and that would be perfectly understandable, as it is fucking crazy), it is insanely well-made, objectively. It probably wouldn't end up on the top of my SK ranking (still have to see a few), but it's definitely a great movie.
 
Went and saw Prince of Persia (2010) today. It actually turned out better than I had expected, not sure where all the hate is coming from especially from reviewers familiar with the games. I thought they captured the essence of the games with plenty of acrobatics and most of the signature platforming maneuvers. The story was the surprise as it was a step above the normal dumbed down summer popcorn flick, I was especially pleased about the ending. Only had 2 problems with the film, I didn't like
the scene and explanation for how the prince was adopted into the royal family, they could have came up with something better
and I also didn't like how the ending was setup
princess (gemma) explained what needed to be done with the dagger with regards to the repercussions for sticking in the stone really quickly and when the prince and his uncle struggled with the dagger it became somewhat of a clusterfuck and I couldn't quite follow what happened and how the sandstorm was stopped. It was obvious what happened afterwards but I think they botched it and hoped the CG effects would distract everyone during that struggle with the dagger scene.
Other than those two minor gripes it was really enjoyable 8/10
 

ymmv

Banned
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
So here's an interesting (and awesome) double feature I just finished:

M (Fritz Lang, 1931)

Amazing. This was actually my first Fritz Lang film, and it was well worthwhile. ( ... ) This movie is great in three simultaneous genres: the police procedural, the serial killer movie, and the anti-Nazi/fascism allegory. I also enjoyed the moments of pure silence in this film; this is a movie where the images often spoke for themselves.

There is no actual anti-Nazi/fascism allegory in the movie. It was made two years before the Nazis came to power. The script was written by Fritz Lang and his then wife Thea von Harbou who became a member of the Nazi party in 1932 (which was presumably one of the reasons why they split).
 
ymmv said:
There is no actual anti-Nazi/fascism allegory in the movie. It was made two years before the Nazis came to power. The script was written by Fritz Lang and his then wife Thea von Harbou who became a member of the Nazi party in 1932 (which was presumably one of the reasons why they split).

Nazis weren't in power at the time, but they did exist and were marching in the streets. More importantly, though, the climate of what would soon become Nazi Germany existed; maybe anti-Nazi was the wrong word. Lang clearly saw the writing on the wall and put it into his movie quite bluntly.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19970803/REVIEWS08/401010339/1023

I'm not the only or the first one to see it. What makes the movie timeless, however, is that that is how people still react because it is true to human nature; go into any GAF thread about a crime and you see people calling for the sort of retributive justice called for by the mobs of the movie.
 

ymmv

Banned
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
Nazis weren't in power at the time, but they did exist and were marching in the streets. More importantly, though, the climate of what would soon become Nazi Germany existed; maybe anti-Nazi was the wrong word. Lang clearly saw the writing on the wall and put it into his movie quite bluntly.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19970803/REVIEWS08/401010339/1023

I'm not the only or the first one to see it. What makes the movie timeless, however, is that that is how people still react because it is true to human nature; go into any GAF thread about a crime and you see people calling for the sort of retributive justice called for by the mobs of the movie.

M is a statement against the dangers of the mob mentality. That's the main theme in another Lang movie: Fury"(1936) but also in William Wellman's The Ox-Bow Incident (1943). I bet there are movies like that from the same time period.
 
I agree that M is fantastic, one of my all-time favs.

Just watched Rosemary's Baby. I was expecting something way different. I thought it was going to be terrifying and creepy the whole time, but I didn't really feel it to the end. I definitely really liked it, Polanski is great. Just not what I expected.
 
ymmv said:
M is a statement against the dangers of the mob mentality. That's the main theme in another Lang movie: Fury"(1936) but also in William Wellman's The Ox-Bow Incident (1943). I bet there are movies like that from the same time period.

Oh, most certainly, but like I say, I think that there are undeniable shades of the Germany that would fall into Nazism just a few years later; I think that that is a historically justified reading of the film.

Incidentally, I actually just watched The Ox-Bow Incident a few days ago; it was good, but M was miles better.
 

-viper-

Banned
ROBIN HOOD

total shite. do not recommend to anyone. it was trying to imitate braveheart instead of being it's own movie i.e. ROBIN FUCKING HOOD.
 
D

Deleted member 1235

Unconfirmed Member
Choke with sam rockwell

I think it might have been brilliant (and funny)

is based off a Chuck Pahlunik novel (I'm not spell checking that)
 
capitalism_a_love_story.jpg


Like with other Moore's films it does a great job in terms of pacing and directing, however how the information ties together and the message it gives is a little unclear. Moore did give some interesting tidbits of information that was little inexcusable, however it wasn't enough. As someone who isn't fond of the system of Capitalism as well, I felt like a lot of arguments were missing. I felt this even stronger with his film "Sicko".

Overall good film, but Moore needs to learn that he should stick to a single road or two to get to his destination instead of constantly hopping around.


the_fountain-poster.jpg


First off I'd like to say I really appreciate Aronofsky for trying to make such a challenging and unique film. That said while he achieved in making something of quality it goes nowhere near the quality of his other films. It just seems like he couldn't make things come together with his usual polish. The film is a bit messy at times and is sometimes just downright confusing. It also feels like many things are missing throughout the film
especially with how it ended
.

That said one positive thing besides the uniqueness is Hugh Jackman's role. He truly nails his character and shows the inner struggles men at times go through and how we like to handle them.

Overall I appreciate its ambition and it's highly unique, not to mention Jackman is in his best performances in his carrer, but other than that there isn't too much to say.
 
All%20The%20Pretty%20Horses%20pic%201.jpg


All the Pretty Horses - One of the most unrecognized and underrated films out there. I bet the three hour cut Thorton has somewhere is amazing. Despite the edited story and timeline, it still works for me. And seeing as its Cormac McCarthy's words, every scene is wonderful to listen to. There's some truly haunting scenes and ideas in the later half.
 

jarosh

Member
Flying_Phoenix said:
the_fountain-poster.jpg


First off I'd like to say I really appreciate Aronofsky for trying to make such a challenging and unique film. That said while he achieved in making something of quality it goes nowhere near the quality of his other films. It just seems like he couldn't make things come together with his usual polish. The film is a bit messy at times and is sometimes just downright confusing. It also feels like many things are missing throughout the film
especially with how it ended
.

That said one positive thing besides the uniqueness is Hugh Jackman's role. He truly nails his character and shows the inner struggles men at times go through and how we like to handle them.

Overall I appreciate its ambition and it's highly unique, not to mention Jackman is in his best performances in his carrer, but other than that there isn't too much to say.
i don't think there's anything unsatisfying or confusing about the ending. and i also think it's aronofsky's best film, by far. there is nothing i don't like about the fountain. i find it more coherent (certainly not more accessible and certainly more obscure and difficult) than any of his other films. it's flawless in my opinion.
 
HiResDes said:
Ditto, I'd rather watch the HBO series.

Euck. That's some blasphemy right there. I liked Spartacus quite a bit.

Don't get the love for the show though. It's like a poor man's Rome mixed with 300. Slow-Mo and screaming every 5 seconds = shit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom