Yes. Its one thing to say that you can't reach them for your vote.No the 47% line was about them being freeloaders and not wanting to take responsibility for their lives. That's what Romney said and what Obama hammered at.
@ppppolls
Colorado voters give Obama a 48/44 victory in the debate- more importantly 58/36 among independents. Sample is R+3
The answer is no.
The number that being close in CO, with Independents being so decisively Obama, means basically every Republican said Mitt lmao.
I don't think any rational person is going to disagree with you...The Libya timeline.
Makes it quite clear that Obama and co. were pushing the protest/video angle from Day 1.
It's one thing to write off half of America. It's another thing to claim you're doing it because they're leeches.
The Libya timeline.
Makes it quite clear that Obama and co. were pushing the protest/video angle from Day 1.
where is this from?
where is this from?
Yes. Its one thing to say that you can't reach them for your vote.
Its an entirely different universe to then say those 47% are victims, entitled, and cannot be convinced to take personal responsibility for their lives.
His words, nobody else's. No spin. The entire tape is available.
This election should have been over the day these words rang out. Its been a shameful farce every day since.
At least Republicans support their guy no matter what. Democrats threw Obama under the bus.
On the subject of whether Obama acknowledged it was an act of terrorism, and the moderator attempting to fact check it, I do feel there is context missing from her statement. Although Obama described the act as "terror", he did side step it when asked directly in the following days of the attack, so from that perspective its understandable why Republicans wanted to call him out on it, and why Romney was under the impression that he had not declared it an act of terror the day after. So I can understand why the Governor was caught off guard and confused. Had he pressed him further on why e.g. he did not confirm that it was terrorism when directly asked on The View, Obama would have been put on the spot.
He said that they believe they are entitled to food and shelter and that they won't take responsibility for their lives.So you'd rather he just write them off with no explanation? Or lying? When did he say they were leeches? What do you call them? He said they believe they are entitled. Why? There's a lot of things I'd like too be entitled to, but I'm not.
Anyone have a video of that Libya moment when the crowd cheered?
He said literally that they could never be convinced to take personal responsibility for their lives.So you'd rather he just write them off with no explanation? Or lying? When did he say they were leeches? What do you call them? He said they believe they are entitled. Why? There's a lot of things I'd like too be entitled to, but I'm not.
The sociopath that actually believes in society won, if thats how you want to see it. Seeing as how up is down and everything.So the seasoned sociopath won?
On the subject of whether Obama acknowledged it was an act of terrorism, and the moderator attempting to fact check it, I do feel there is context missing from her statement. Although Obama described the act as "terror", he did side step it when asked directly in the following days of the attack, so from that perspective its understandable why Republicans wanted to call him out on it, and why Romney was under the impression that he had not declared it an act of terror the day after. So I can understand why the Governor was caught off guard and confused. Had he pressed him further on why e.g. he did not confirm that it was terrorism when directly asked on The View, Obama would have been put on the spot.
LOL this MSNBC stream is great.
re: "act of terror" statement in the rose garden -
guy on fox news: "candy crowley had no business doing a real time fact check because she was dead wrong."
lol.
Sometimes I forget how Romney even got this far. Dude has no fucking charisma, shits all over the rules and doesn't give two fucks about the stench of arrogance he gives off.
The lady in the back is Mitt's wife btdubs
So you'd rather he just write them off with no explanation? Or lying? When did he say they were leeches? What do you call them? He said they believe they are entitled. Why? There's a lot of things I'd like too be entitled to, but I'm not.
Whatever, it might be bad for polls and perception, but I'd rather have it this way. At least democratic leaning people are realistic. Conservatives are really living in their own bubble, and reveling in cognitive dissonance.
So people who work in the public sector aren't considered having a job?I just love the irony of Romney blaming Obama for everything and then muttering "government doesn't create jobs."
His muttering is pretty much correct, but it undermines his entire campaign. Surprised the media isn't jumping on that. Guess it is too sophisticated for them.
Whatever, it might be bad for polls and perception, but I'd rather have it this way. At least democratic leaning people are realistic. Conservatives are really living in their own bubble, and reveling in cognitive dissonance.
German TV who was also showing the debate, had a viewer poll of 87% for Obama and 13% for Romney.
You're interpretation of this event and what he said is at odds with reality. Clearly you have an pre-established inclination to see Romney in the best possible light.
And, BTW, I can't think of another time in modern American history where a man running for President showed such disdain for HALF of this country's citizens.
How would you interpret his statement as anything but shitting on people?
Maybe a fair point outside of this forum, but holy shit, don't say this on GAF.
To the audience that was targeted, it's what they wanted to hear. It's an election, politicians will pander to their audiences. I'm not going to sit here and say it was the most eloquently phrased statement, but I understood what he was trying to say, that a good majority has written off him completely (whether it was 47% or not). He has to focus on the ones who haven't to deliver what his audience wanted.
German TV who was also showing the debate, had a viewer poll of 87% for Obama and 13% for Romney.
Who gives a shit about this Libya semantics thing. Obama is right, the GOP trying to politicise this thing is insensitive and wrong. Especially when they wanted to push a budget that would further cut security at the site. Seriously we need to move past this thing. Far more serious issues on the table.
GOVERNMENT DOES NOT CREATE JOBS
GOVERNMENT DOES NOT CREATE JOBS
Happy Endings. Sitcom on... I wanna say ABC.
Happy Endings.
Fair enough, Romney should have stuck to that line and not tried to play gotcha on three words Obama might or might not have said the day after the attack.