ConfusingJazz
Member
FnordChan said:
There is a drive in on Burnet?
EDIT: Oh, it died in the 70s, maybe QT and Robert are going to refurbish it or something?
FnordChan said:
Jumpman Jr. said:Im going to see this. I like bad movies and action films and apple pie, but honestly, Grindhouse doesnt look good. It doesnt even look good/bad. I feel that QT and RR dont have a sense of what real violence is, what real pain is, and how it affects us. Like in the beginning of From Dust to Dawn, QT gets shot in his hand. As Clooney and QT drive off, Q puts his harmed hand to his face and playfully looks through the hole. If it happened in real life, I doubt hed be able to lift his hand, let alone wave it around.
I understand Grindhouse isnt meant to be taken seriously. Its a salute to violent B movies. So its a detached look at movies that have a detached look at violence. So its violence viewed through two mirrors. Its an ironic detachment of detachment to actual violence, where the violence is pretty graphics for the sake of pretty graphics.
The whole phantom limb of a stripper replaced by a gun actually sickens me. We are at war with real soldiers returning with missing limbs; I doubt they simply swallowed the pain and popped a gun into their empty sockets. Guess Im not cool.
And whats the deal with the trailers? Are they meant to be self-parody or just empty images?
Jumpman Jr. said:Im going to see this. I like bad movies and action films and apple pie, but honestly, Grindhouse doesnt look good. It doesnt even look good/bad. I feel that QT and RR dont have a sense of what real violence is, what real pain is, and how it affects us. Like in the beginning of From Dust to Dawn, QT gets shot in his hand. As Clooney and QT drive off, Q puts his harmed hand to his face and playfully looks through the hole. If it happened in real life, I doubt hed be able to lift his hand, let alone wave it around.
I understand Grindhouse isnt meant to be taken seriously. Its a salute to violent B movies. So its a detached look at movies that have a detached look at violence. So its violence viewed through two mirrors. Its an ironic detachment of detachment to actual violence, where the violence is pretty graphics for the sake of pretty graphics.
The whole phantom limb of a stripper replaced by a gun actually sickens me. We are at war with real soldiers returning with missing limbs; I doubt they simply swallowed the pain and popped a gun into their empty sockets. Guess Im not cool.
And whats the deal with the trailers? Are they meant to be self-parody or just empty images?
I'm assuming that's just a reference to an old theatre that used to play these kinds of movies.ConfusingJazz said:There is a drive in on Burnet?
EDIT: Oh, it died in the 70s, maybe QT and Robert are going to refurbish it or something?
??????Jumpman Jr. said:Im going to see this. I like bad movies and action films and apple pie, but honestly, Grindhouse doesnt look good. It doesnt even look good/bad. I feel that QT and RR dont have a sense of what real violence is, what real pain is, and how it affects us. Like in the beginning of From Dust to Dawn, QT gets shot in his hand. As Clooney and QT drive off, Q puts his harmed hand to his face and playfully looks through the hole. If it happened in real life, I doubt hed be able to lift his hand, let alone wave it around.
I understand Grindhouse isnt meant to be taken seriously. Its a salute to violent B movies. So its a detached look at movies that have a detached look at violence. So its violence viewed through two mirrors. Its an ironic detachment of detachment to actual violence, where the violence is pretty graphics for the sake of pretty graphics.
The whole phantom limb of a stripper replaced by a gun actually sickens me. We are at war with real soldiers returning with missing limbs; I doubt they simply swallowed the pain and popped a gun into their empty sockets. Guess Im not cool.
And whats the deal with the trailers? Are they meant to be self-parody or just empty images?
Matix said:Booo, get off the stage !!
Jumpman Jr. said:And whats the deal with the trailers? Are they meant to be self-parody or just empty images?
Global warming.Donono said:What the hell was that about?
Jumpman Jr. said:Im going to see this. I like bad movies and action films and apple pie, but honestly, Grindhouse doesnt look good. It doesnt even look good/bad. I feel that QT and RR dont have a sense of what real violence is, what real pain is, and how it affects us. Like in the beginning of From Dust to Dawn, QT gets shot in his hand. As Clooney and QT drive off, Q puts his harmed hand to his face and playfully looks through the hole. If it happened in real life, I doubt hed be able to lift his hand, let alone wave it around.
I understand Grindhouse isnt meant to be taken seriously. Its a salute to violent B movies. So its a detached look at movies that have a detached look at violence. So its violence viewed through two mirrors. Its an ironic detachment of detachment to actual violence, where the violence is pretty graphics for the sake of pretty graphics.
The whole phantom limb of a stripper replaced by a gun actually sickens me. We are at war with real soldiers returning with missing limbs; I doubt they simply swallowed the pain and popped a gun into their empty sockets. Guess Im not cool.
And whats the deal with the trailers? Are they meant to be self-parody or just empty images?
OH! I see it now.temp said:Global warming.
Jumpman Jr. said:Im going to see this. I like bad movies and action films and apple pie, but honestly, Grindhouse doesnt look good. It doesnt even look good/bad. I feel that QT and RR dont have a sense of what real violence is, what real pain is, and how it affects us. Like in the beginning of From Dust to Dawn, QT gets shot in his hand. As Clooney and QT drive off, Q puts his harmed hand to his face and playfully looks through the hole. If it happened in real life, I doubt hed be able to lift his hand, let alone wave it around.
I understand Grindhouse isnt meant to be taken seriously. Its a salute to violent B movies. So its a detached look at movies that have a detached look at violence. So its violence viewed through two mirrors. Its an ironic detachment of detachment to actual violence, where the violence is pretty graphics for the sake of pretty graphics.
The whole phantom limb of a stripper replaced by a gun actually sickens me. We are at war with real soldiers returning with missing limbs; I doubt they simply swallowed the pain and popped a gun into their empty sockets. Guess Im not cool.
And whats the deal with the trailers? Are they meant to be self-parody or just empty images?
DreamMachine said:wtf? what is wrong with you people that movie looks like shit.
Ichirou_Oogami said:
In this trailer it looks like everything with Danny Trejo is just a fake trailer for "Machete", and everything else is from Planet Terror.LM4sure said:Wonder which parts of the trailer are from the actual films and which is from the fake trailers...
Ichirou_Oogami said:
Ichirou_Oogami said:
Yeah, seriously, Tarantino...why the **** aren't you donig a better job of making movies with Rodriguez' name on them?shuri said:You would think that QT would know a thing of two about the atmosphere of those trailers , what the **** went wrong.
Goreomedy said:That looks sooooooo good/bad/good/bad/good/bad/goo-self destructs.
Flynn said:I'd ask your shrink to lower your dosage. That looked shit hot.
Willco said:STFU
jett said:Looks okay. Rodriguez has only made one movie that isn't total shitcakes(Sin City), and that's because of Frank Miller. I'm more interested in seeing QT's half.
Solo said:What genre is left for QT to mine after this? Snuff films?
DMczaf said:
Damn it, give me my Escape from NY sequel! It sucks that Escape from NY never had a sequel, ever....EVER!
O RLY?Solo said:I still think this whole project is a giant turd, but kudos to QT for getting Kurt Russell into playing a badass again. Too many sappy, family oriented movies lately.
Solo said:Never seen it, so I can't comment.
After HOSTEL DEUX wrapped we went right into shooting the GRIND HOUSE trailer which was absolutely ****ing nuts. It's seriously the most fun I've had shooting anything since 7th grade. My friend Jeff came over from Boston and we got to film this thing we've been dreaming of shooting since we were 18 years old. Gabe produced it and everyone who was in town made cameos in it. We basically had 2 days to cram in as much sex, violence and silliness as we could, and we just ****ing went for it. It was honestly the most fun I've ever had shooting anything. HOSTEL was a blast, as was HOSTEL PART II, but with the GRIND HOUSE trailer there were absolutely no rules. No continuity, no character development, just pure unadulterated, unfiltered violence and insanity. My D.P. Milan Chadima shot it, and he busted out lenses from the 1970's! It was too ****ing cool. I really want it to look like the trailer for THE PROWLER or MANIAC, and we shot it with the old school camera and lenses. Nobody shot with them in years, and Milan said the rental house dug them up out of the basement just for him. It was awesome. I don't want to give anything away, but let's just say that we made a mess in the center of a small town and it involved a lot of blood. We had about 200 extras, including about 40 screaming girls aged 4-9 dressed like majorettes (twirling batons and everything) and a panic-stricken riot with people dressed like Pilgrims and Indians. We were laughing so hard shooting it we nearly passed out, and a few times I actually thought people got really hurt. But we made it out unscathed, and even the screaming majorettes were showing off how much blood they got splattered on their white majorette costumes. The other stuff we shot is so absurdly disgusting I don't want to give it away, you'll have to see it in GRIND HOUSE. But between HOSTEL: PART II and the trailer let's just say I kept the KNB guys plenty busy. And they did a ****ing amazing job. God I love those guys.