http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tf37wAbxOus[Nintex] said:The animal protection organisation's should sue SEGA for animal abuse, they raped that Hedgehog for far to long!
gutter_trash said:
lessthanthree said:
I think she is the female version of the guy who married PeachChao said:Elkastone got serious here. Please Sega, hire this guy and your Sonic games will be 10x times better than they are now.
lessthanthree said:WTF :lol :lol :lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZPmt30LyYA :lol :lol :lol
OMG
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiyXoLnYsw4 :lol :lol :lol :lol
_leech_ said:
Fularu said:Oh THANK YOU Kind sir for putting me in *my* place for using the french word because I'm used to! Wow you sure served me right there.
I'm sorry, but even if I used the wrong *legal* terms for the stuff I cited, but when you do something with the intended point of HARMING a company through so called "humour", it is attackable on a legal standpoint.
And there have been cases where "parodies" or "mocking" an intelectual property has led to rulings. Thankfully we don't all live in uncle sam's country eh?
Bildi said:Since you mentioned that "there have been cases where "parodies" or "mocking" an intelectual property has led to rulings", otherwise known as a legal precedent, here are some legal precedents against your argument from an authoritative legal database: http://www.somethingawful.com/legal/
Now you can come up with some to support your argument. That way we can all play courtroom drama!
Stumpokapow said:If you want ACTUAL legal precedents, you can check Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc or Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin both within the last ten years. Both of which affirm the right to parody, which is explicitly stated in US copyright law anyway.