RazorbackDB
Member
found this http://www.dsogaming.com/news/resident-evil-6-pc-benchmark-leaked-online/ maybe that's why nvidia link doesn't work. I will remove TPB link then.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Resident Evil 6 PC Benchmark
- Thread starter Spazznid
- Start date
S Rank my balls. That performance is disappointing.
Shit dropped to 35fps at points, like when the camera zoomed all the way out on Leon and his girl. Extremely disappointing.
Here is my test at lowest settings. WHERE THE FUCK ARE YOU PULLING THAT SCORE OUT OF?
Shit dropped to 35fps at points, like when the camera zoomed all the way out on Leon and his girl. Extremely disappointing.
I don't understand this. I have literally the same hardware, but half the score? I was running all settings maxed w/ Vsync off.Performance is a bit over the place I saw it go from 150fps maybe half of the time to 60-90 the majority of the rest of the time with two dips into the 30s
No DX 11 CAPCPOM? Hell even RE5 managed better than this!
Here is my test at lowest settings. WHERE THE FUCK ARE YOU PULLING THAT SCORE OUT OF?
lunchtoast
Member
Anyone try this on windows 8? Computer was making a high pitch sound and crashed at Resident Evil logo.
had to use compatibility settings
had to use compatibility settings
Forgot to take a screen but I scored in the 6000's with an i5 3570K + GTX 670 @ 2560X1440
I forgot to save the resolution change at first and the bump up from 1080 cut my framerate in half. It's usually not that severe of a drop. I was wondering why it looked so shitty at first.
9417 @ 1080
I forgot to save the resolution change at first and the bump up from 1080 cut my framerate in half. It's usually not that severe of a drop. I was wondering why it looked so shitty at first.
9417 @ 1080
Worked out of the box for me.
UltimateIke
Member
How aggressive are your overclocks?
What was the highest frame rate you saw? Even with v-sync off in the game, you might have it enabled in the driver global settings, and that will limit you to 60 FPS in most cases. I saw 132 FPS when the demo first started, and the time at 100+ frames really boosted my score.
I got 12181 with a 3570k and GTX670, so I know MrBS has the score you should be getting.
Ryuuga's 48203 is what I still don't understand. Unless it is a joke with the 4 added on front.
Worked fine for me.
Tried this last night. This is such a weird benchmark. It doesn't seem representative of in-game scenarios. There are points where they zoom out to show a scene where the screen is completely flooded with zombies, and I don't remember that in-game on the 360. It seems more like a stress test or general benchmarking tool at times rather than how the game will behave in-game.
MrCunningham
Member
S Rank my balls. That performance is disappointing.
Here is my test at lowest settings. WHERE THE FUCK ARE YOU PULLING THAT SCORE OUT OF?
I'm just taking a guess... but maybe it has something to do with the refresh rate. I noticed that the game scored higher if the refresh rate is turned up. My monitor supports 75hz max... so when I had it at that setting, my score was much higher than what it was when I tried to benchmark the game at 60hz.
here:
I set my refresh rate to 60hz and you can see the difference from my previous screenshot. 7683 @60hz vs 8497 @75hz. It might help explain a few things.
This is on my rig with my modest overclocks(i7 980x@4.0mhz/Gtx 670@1163/3251mhz). Newest Drivers really helped with the graphical oddities.
1080p
http://i.minus.com/ikQfRX0M6CBv9.bmp (enormous BMP file)
1440p
http://i.minus.com/i3BKtSgWZqE0q.bmp (enormous BMP file)
1080p
http://i.minus.com/ikQfRX0M6CBv9.bmp (enormous BMP file)
1440p
http://i.minus.com/i3BKtSgWZqE0q.bmp (enormous BMP file)
That may be the niggling issue that I have two 590's running in quad SLI. Sorry, I probably should have mentioned that
Also running my 2600K @ 4.5Where is the temp dl folder of Mega? Saved it on E:, but the space is still gone on C:.
dr. apocalipsis
Banned
Thank you, mister. Downloading right now.
Core2 needs 3'2Ghz minimum to shine. Please, OC that CPU that bit. It's crying right now
Oh I have no doubt this will run like a dream similar to DmC. My only concern is whether I really wanna double dip on this game. I don't see visuals being my issue with RE6. . .
dr. apocalipsis
Banned
Oh, btw, Am I the only one just hating FXAA and those shitty new AA methods?
I prefer to go no AA before those image blurriers.
I prefer to go no AA before those image blurriers.
ambientmystic
Member
Funny thing is that all the previous CAPCPOM MT Framework games ported to the PC supported the much more superior and cleaner MSAA options for hardware based AA.
Lost Planet, Lost Planet 2, Resident Evil 5 and Devil May Cry 4 all supported MSAA. I'm not sure why RE6 doesn't support it, unless they switched to a deferred renderer.
Spazznid
Member
SMAA is my future.
It replicates 4xMSAA VERY well and doesn't blur the image like FXAA did.
Relaxed Muscle
Member
They did.
All the dodges, quick shots, and little mechanical quirks shown in the promotional videos were blowing my tiny little mind. The combat seems to have tons of depth, lack of focus be damned.
Oh, got a C, awful framerate all-around. lol. Guess I gotta start thinking about getting a new PC.
Oh, got a C, awful framerate all-around. lol. Guess I gotta start thinking about getting a new PC.
Dark Octave
Banned
No V-Sync. Everything maxed.
With V-Sync on my score was 7808.
With V-Sync on my score was 7808.
It does! Mercs in this game is a blast, a lot better than the campaign IMO.
One of the ways to set up a coup-de-grâce (7s bonus on mercs) is to stagger an enemy and then hit him with a slide. Zombie enemies will spin when you put them into a coup-de-grâce state, so you shoot them in the shoulder so they'll turn their backs on you, and then you slide, they'll turn around and face you again so you can finish them off with your coup. That's just one little example of the depth in this game, it's so good.
Parries, quick shots, dodges, rolls, slides, melee, all the different finishers, the bosses requirements for mercs maps... The lack of focus is a big, big problem for the campaign, but mercs in this game is already worth your money.
BlockheadBrown
Member
Thanks!
2040x1152 res
i5 2500k @ 4.5ghz
GTX 680 with a mild OC (+135 core + 225 mem)
8gb RAM
there were some drops. One nasty to 33-ish during the pullback at the end of the first scene.
there seems to be a visual glitch of sorts though.. maybe it just happens to me? on the second scene there's like a 2D image superimposed over the whole thing. Cant capture it on screenshots for some reason but it's definetly there.
MrCunningham
Member
A few others have reported this issue too, but it was fixable by upgrading to the latest Nvidia video driver.
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
Can't get a decent OC on the GPU's or else I would feel a lot better but still a good score.
yeah just realized that, downloading now
Hey folks, we have now officially released the benchmark: http://www.geforce.com/games-applications/pc-games/resident-evil-6 (earlier upload was accidentally)
We also recommend upgrading to the latest WHQL driver for the benchmark: http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/nvidia-geforce-314-07-whql-drivers-released
Appreciate you not distributing the file ahead of the official release, I really do.
Many best regards,
Andy
We also recommend upgrading to the latest WHQL driver for the benchmark: http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/nvidia-geforce-314-07-whql-drivers-released
Appreciate you not distributing the file ahead of the official release, I really do.
Many best regards,
Andy
1080p latest Nvidia drivers now
v-sync on:
uncapped framerate:
and yeah idk about the results, seems a bit iffy. My 2040x1152 benchmark actually scored higher than the 1080p one, lol. And other people here with a similar rig to me seem to be getting a lot better scores (and some are getting worse).
v-sync on:
uncapped framerate:
and yeah idk about the results, seems a bit iffy. My 2040x1152 benchmark actually scored higher than the 1080p one, lol. And other people here with a similar rig to me seem to be getting a lot better scores (and some are getting worse).
here's a good example. 5000+ that on my benchmark and im OCed (both GPU and CPU)
does the i7 really make that much of a difference :S
ambientmystic
Member
Andy's running a dual 680 GTX SLI system lol
If you check out his 1st screenshot you can clearly see a GPU 1 and GPU 2 in the Afterburner OSD at the top left corner.
doh
first screenshot didnt load for some reason
still, some guys like Addnan are running a stock 670 and getting 1500+ more
Dark Octave
Banned
I was about to say.
I have a slightly better CPU and he has a slightly better GPU but he just blew me out of the water performance wise.
That had me really confused and I was beginning to believe that he just overclocked his whole system all to hell or something.
ROFL YOU SON OF A BITCHThat may be the niggling issue that I have two 590's running in quad SLI. Sorry, I probably should have mentioned that
It's all good.
SneakyStephan
Banned
Kudos to them for releasing a benchmark, there days most game devs seem to want to avoid people finding out how their games will run on people's computers.
And every once in a while we get DmC.
Except that, as people mentioned, this seems like an extremely odd benchmark, and more like a stress test. I had no worry about my laptop running the game, but the sections in the benchmark seem to be a 'worst-case' scenario and don't exactly give my laptop great results.
Felix Lighter
Member
Massive drop below 30 fps at the end of the first scene. Second scene dipped below 60. Kind of disappointed in the performance actually when compared to other MT Framework games.
The part where the camera zooms out to show 100 zombies on screen was just like "Why would they do that?".
I don't even think there's anything in the actual game that is as hardware intensive as the 5-10 seconds of that in the benchmark.
BadAss2961
Member
What's with the mixed results? RE5 was sweet on many levels of hardware.