The First Guardian
Member
I'll buy it on Black Friday when it'll be 399 or 449 with a game.
With the pro hitting 1:5 its not a small market is it...
Even less because of what? Give me an actual reason rather than fluff.
Pachter predicting $399 sealed it, I kinda suspected it and it's probably worth the price too.
I'll buy it on Black Friday when it'll be 399 or 449 with a game.
So they expect similar to the Pro. Did anyone expect otherwise?! I don't get what youre saying.Per Phil back in march.
"I'm not trying to scare anybody on the price. We're going to come out on a price that we think is fair for the product that we build and the customers will tell us as they always do. I call it premium because I don't want people to get confused that somehow Scorpio is the thing that is going to take over the Xbox line."
While Spencer didn't outright say the price, he did hint that Scorpio would hold a higher price point than the Xbox One S. The hint came when Spencer detailed that the Xbox One S would remain the top seller, even over Scorpio.
"The majority of the consoles that we're going to sell are the Xbox One S and I'm very proud of that," he said.
So a pretty small market I think. According to him anyway.
I'm not doing a detailed analysis on a per component basis of the cost. I'm giving an answer to the general perception of why people might think that Microsoft would be releasing a a 4K capable Xbox One that had better performance a year later at the same price as the PS4 Pro. It was not an unreasonable expectation in price point given that it was a whole year later and that the PS4 Pro just falls short of being able to hit native 4K. Plus, being the platform that is behind in market share significantly, one would expect them to be more competitive too. The $399 expectation wasn't something that was unreasonable.
Shouldn't be directing that with me 😂
I think $449 would of been the sweet spot, but there's so much salt in here its unbelievable.
Dude, your level of self-delusion is almost impressive. I mean, when youre trying to defend the value of the X, and deny the official numbers because they're not high enough in your own mind...What a load of BS. 40% figure is crap. Take into account RAM, GPU clock, RAM B/W and even the smaller CPU improvements.
All the games shown at that conference were 4K. This is a true native 4K device for $100 more than a box which hardly gets any support.
You come off as pathetic dude. But keep fighting the good battle, lmaoYeah and they're wrong themselves.
I love how when they're actually wrong, they're suddenly right...
Did anyone expect otherwise?
UK getting shafted again on price. £450 is more like $570.
Care to explain why? Cause the statement I made is correct.You come off as pathetic dude.
I don't know how a $300 gap between the top of the line console and the cheapest current gen console this year for the XBO X vs a $150 gap last year for the PS4P is something that needs explaining. Calling it fluff isn't a very good response.With the pro hitting 1:5 its not a small market is it...
Even less because of what? Give me an actual reason rather than fluff.
Sure it's reasonable to have expected it, but from the time of actually knowing the full spec and MS consistently saying it's a premium product and will be priced accordingly, from the beginning, it was glaringly obvious that it was not going to be 399.
PS4 Pro is 399
Scorpio is 50% more powerful, 50% more RAM, UHD Blu Ray, liquid cooled, all in a matchbox. Why should it be the same price?
edit
Because apparently that's the maximum amount a console can be, no matter how much is packed into it.
People expect this to be 399 yet no one is crying their eyes out that the Pro is overpriced... Wonder why that is,..
What a load of BS. 40% figure is crap. Take into account RAM, GPU clock, RAM B/W and even the smaller CPU improvements.
All the games shown at that conference were 4K. This is a true native 4K device for $100 more than a box which hardly gets any support.
Microsoft told us the specs of the then Scorpio which definitely screamed loud and clear it was going to be more than $399. The only reason people gave for not believing it was that they didn't want to believe it.I don't think anything Microsoft said leading up to today made it blatantly clear it was going to be more than $399. You're looking at hindsight by stating that. The PS4 Pro is a premium product. Phil Spencer saying Scorpio was going to be a premium product doesn't automatically mean more than $399. It simply means it's going to be priced higher than the One S which regularly was going for $200 to $250 during the holidays. Even at $399, that's twice the price.
I don't think anything Microsoft said leading up to today made it blatantly clear it was going to be more than $399. You're looking at hindsight by stating that. The PS4 Pro is a premium product. Phil Spencer saying Scorpio was going to be a premium product doesn't automatically mean more than $399. It simply means it's going to be priced higher than the One S which regularly was going for $200 to $250 during the holidays. Even at $399, that's twice the price.
Chill dude. The 40% more powerful came from Microsoft. Direct your anger at them
Yeah and they're wrong themselves.
I don't know how a $300 gap between the top of the line console and the cheapest current gen console this year for the XBO X vs a $150 gap last year for the PS4P is something that needs explaining. Calling it fluff isn't a very good response.
The Pro hitting 1 in 5 is a much smaller market than the standard console, yes? That is absolutely the point I was making. Now imagine if it was more expensive.
People usually only claim that a company is lying when they're overstating their advantage. You're claiming that they're understating it. Why would any company ever do that?Care to explain why? Cause the statement I made is correct.
It was a huge hint, people just didn't want to believe and instead created their own realities.
Uhm, no they didn't?Nah, it is not like people were saying that Scorpio would change everything and MS now would have a fighting chance.
Oh wait, people did.
Again, you never said why it's wrong.People usually only claim that a company is lying when they're overstating their advantage. You're claiming that they're understating it. Why would any company ever do that?
That is also the reason why everyone is defending that number, it doesn't make much sense to claim that MS is spinning their advantage to make it seem smaller.
Its not that Microsoft usually day things that are "wrong" per say, just that they spin things a little too much for some people's liking. Like Phil claiming 22 console exclusives yesterday, and most of the games shown only being launch exclusives.
I'm not saying Microsoft made it sound like it wouldn't be more than $399 either. I'm saying $399 was a reasonable expectation but also going higher was reasonable. I'm not faulting anyone that woke up this morning thinking when Microsoft announced, it would be $399. That was completely reasonable.
Uhm, no they didn't?
I don't recall anybody on here saying Scorpio would outsell the S and propel them into the lead, but you keep thinking what you want to.
In 2019?
I dont get people like you. "lets Complain about a product and demand ridiculous things without Even thinking about buying it in the first place no matter what.".
Whats the Point?
It was a huge hint, people just didn't want to believe and instead created their own realities.
Oh, come on. Every bloody sales thread had people claiming that Xbone sales were going to get much better once Scorpio arrived.Uhm, no they didn't?
I don't recall anybody on here saying Scorpio would outsell the S and propel them into the lead, but you keep thinking what you want to.
Again, you never said why it's wrong.
Why what is wrong?Again, you never said why it's wrong.
Yep. I thought people generally expected over 400 due to what we had heard so far but I guess a ton of you only really became aware of Scorpio yesterday or some shitIt was a huge hint, people just didn't want to believe and instead created their own realities.
So they expect similar to the Pro. Did anyone expect otherwise?! I don't get what youre saying.
Next yearWere any of the new Xbox titles VR-ready? One of the earlier talked-about Scorpio features was that it would have VR in mind - which, to be fair, is a fairly non-committal time-frame... but time's running out to get an established leg into the VR world.
Still coming down from that lack of a Halo: Gravemind horror/survival secret surprise. :/
Want to link to all these people?Oh, come on. Every bloody sales thread had people claiming that Xbone sales were going to get much better once Scorpio arrived.
Np, I'm just saying they've always expected similar to the pro and we all did here.Maybe I misunderstood you but it sounded like you were saying the market for these enthusiast's consoles was pretty big. Sorry if I misunderstood.
Me stating the 40% figure is actually unrepresentative.Why what is wrong?
You all spout stats like stats are why you by the console. You can't play stats. The XB1X might have 40% more power, but you aren't going to enjoy it anywhere near 40% more. For one thing, third party developers aren't going to spend a lot of time specifically optimizing for the console likely to have to lowest install base. For another, all games will have to run on the base consoles so their gameplay can't be designed to take advantage of either the Pro or X. Finally, we are seriously getting into diminishing returns territory. Remember when Microsoft was saying 900p was pretty similar to 1080p? Well that difference is the Grand Canyon compared to checkerboarded 4K and native 4K.
Ultimately you'll be paying that Xbox One X premium price for not a lot of real world benefit. (Note, I've said the same about the Pro) The Xbox One X isn't just $100 more than the PS4 Pro. It's $250 more than the base models. Put that another way. You could buy an XB1 AND a PS4 for the same price as the Xbox One X. Now surely someone would get far more enjoyment out of having access to both console's libraries over the minor real world game performance boost they'd get for paying $500 for the X.
Microsoft told us the specs of the then Scorpio which definitely screamed loud and clear it was going to be more than $399. The only reason people gave for not believing it was that they didn't want to believe it.
Were any of the new Xbox titles VR-ready? One of the earlier talked-about Scorpio features was that it would have VR in mind - which, to be fair, is a fairly non-committal time-frame... but time's running out to get an established leg into the VR world.
Still coming down from that lack of a Halo: Gravemind horror/survival secret surprise. :/