• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Jared Fogle's (Subway guy) home raided in federal Child Porn investigation

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Skunkers

Member
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

Um. Dude.

No.

Child porn is absolutely repugnant, and not because the person possessing it might be bad in the future, or because it's weird. It's heinous because actual children were abused in the production of it. And worse, the immense legal pressure against child porn means that what child porn rings do remain are usually very close to the actual assaults.
 
D

Deleted member 13876

Unconfirmed Member
NomarTyme said:
Dude shit man. You obviously wrote this with thoughts and consideration. Holy fuck I hope you're trolling.
Click to expand...

Don't want to go all detective GAF on this guy, but I distinctly remember a very weird thread he made that has since been deleted.
 
D

Damaniel

Banned
super-heated plasma said:
Once an accusation like that flys, innocent or not, you may as well move to another country and change your name.
Click to expand...

The Internet never forgets though, no matter where you go. Even if you're innocent, people will know - or at least they'll find out the moment you try to get a job, enroll in school, or do pretty much anything that causes someone to go and Google you.

If you're cruel enough to want to ruin someone's life forever, falsely accusing that person of child abuse or having child porn on their computer is the most effective way.

EDIT:

AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad.
Click to expand...

Just saw this. Let me join the chorus of 'this is SO bad'. There's ZERO reason to have that kind of material on ANY hard drive, especially not your own. Ew.
 
I

I H8 Memes

Member
ahoyhoy said:
Actually seems like a really easy way to fuck someone over for life: gain access to their computer for 5 minutes, download a bunch of CP and other illegal stuff into a directory they won't find, clear the browser history, and report a tip sometime later.
Click to expand...

I remember a story where some guy did this to his neighbor.
 
Red Mage

Red Mage

Member
Conor_Fool said:
MtZ9N.gif
Click to expand...

For that second post, you need that demonic looking goat-head version.
 
A

andymcc

Banned
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

holy shit
 
N

NewFresh

Member
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

I have to assume you are terrible TERRIBLY misinformed about what child pornography is (don't even know how this is possible), to have written this post whole heartedly.
 
I

ivysaur12

Banned
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

Zero hyperbole: this is the worst post I've ever seen in NeoGAF.
 
B

braves01

Banned
ahoyhoy said:
Actually seems like a really easy way to fuck someone over for life: gain access to their computer for 5 minutes, download a bunch of CP and other illegal stuff into a directory they won't find, clear the browser history, and report a tip sometime later.
Click to expand...

Now that sounds like set-up for a terrifying modern day Count of Monte Cristo.
 
C

Conor_Fool

Banned
I H8 Memes said:
The second post I wont argue with. But you are aware that Jared Fogle had nothing to do with this besides being the employer of someone with child porn. Right?
Click to expand...

You mean to say that you would argue for the first then? The person that says he hopes Jared is guilty? I don't even
 
A

Anoregon

The flight plan I just filed with the agency list me, my men, Dr. Pavel here. But only one of you!
It was only a matter of time until this thread got here.
 
CassidyIzABeast

CassidyIzABeast

Member
2013-11-20-11_28_53.gif

AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...
 
S

SnowFlakeCake

Member
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

asdsoauxq.gif
 
M

Maninthemirror

Banned
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

what?!!!!!

this is like saying revenge porn is good for everyone involved
 
L

Levito

Banned
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

VskCtBr.gif
 
X

Xcellere

Member
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

Welp, that's enough Internet for today.
 
T

Tyrant Rave

Banned
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...
what the fuck
 
O

OverBlood 3

Banned
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

Bravo *slow claps* dumbest post ever.
 
J

Jawbreaker

Member
BUNTING1243 said:
it's real weird how threads on GAF about this topic devolve into "HEY IT'S NOT THAT BAD"
Click to expand...

They do? I've never noticed this before. At most, I've seen people arguing that we should have empathy for those attracted to children who don't act out on their urges because we've done a shitty job as a society in trying to get them help and being more understanding. For example, many people conflate having this attraction with being a child molester. They make no distinction between the two and also make arguments that they should be "locked up before they act." It's a discussion that needs to take place, but it's always very contentious.

I honestly don't recall seeing any thread on NeoGAF where a notable number of users were arguing that owning, distributing or producing child pornography wasn't "that bad." I may have missed the threads you're mentioning, however. I'm kind of hoping this user clarifies what they meant or at least explains why they feel that way.
 
Werewolf Jones

Werewolf Jones

Member
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

MUt4C8v.gif


From the first sentence you were done. Oh My God.
 
J

Jpop

Unconfirmed Member
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...
Uhh..... Wtf
 
T

totowhoa

Banned
Got DAMN O_O I get what Azure was trying to say with his allusion to furry porn, I guess, but it just leads me to believe that he has no idea what child porn is, how it's created, or the lengths you have to go to obtain it.

I've been on a furry site for a kick before.

I never have and never will jump through the hoops necessary to see what all the hubbub is over CP. Jesus Christ. Nobody gets that on their hard drive "by accident"

ElectricBlanketFire said:
What I like is that Azure dropped that bomb and is now merrily back to posting in the WarioWare thread.
Click to expand...

lol saw that too. First thing I did after reading that was check the threads he's created for any other potential gems.
 
R

RP912

Banned
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

sighs...

shaking_head_breaking_bad.gif
 
M

Maninthemirror

Banned
That post wil be long remembered and often posted in future 'you remember when THAT happened?" such a stupid post.

If you have pictures of naked children, they are there not for nothing, they are there because you are heavily inclined to in the past/present/future make the illegal move of try and coerce a child to be with you. That is bad, nomatter how you frame it
 
T

totowhoa

Banned
LowKeyedUp said:
We will all remember where we were and what we were wearing when we first read Azure's post.
Click to expand...

Wasting time in the office on GAF while wearing my Turquoise Jeep shirt.

That was one of the most incredibly bad posts I've ever seen.

Wish he'd gotten one more defensive post in before the ban.
 
S

Snaku

Banned
AzureTranquility95 said:
I don't think having child pornography on your hard drive is so bad, but it's definitely wierd as fuck. Wouldn't catch me with it... I just don't see how anyone could get any sort of sexual thrill or high from naked children. :/

It's like assuming someone is a furry just because they have furry porn on their hard drive. Difference is, child porn can convict someone. Furry porn will just get you wierd looks at worst.

Now if the guy actually raped a kid... that would be a whole different story, bro. That's not cool.

But accusations aren't to be taken likely. And in my experience, people can make some wiiiiild accusations based on a few actions that could be mis-interpreted.

For example, posting lots of nice comments on someone's blog could either be interpreted as A: being a creep or B: just being a nice guy.

Of course, it's way easier to assume someone is a pedophile if they have child pornography on their person. However, porn in and of itself is not harmful, it just severely implies that the person is capable of doing something potentially harmful at some point in the future. Which I guess is why it's considered a crime, it's more of a preventative thing.

I don't think Jared from Subway is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

ibu8wTMIR4a4Bd.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Jared Fogle’s Ex-Wife Says Subway Knew Its Spokesman Was a Pedophile
2
84
14K
M52B28 replied
  • Locked
Feds Raid Home Of Subway's Jared
31
3K
m0dus replied
Priest kept child porn as ‘revenge’ on God for poker losses
2 3
101
14K
Pesmerga00 replied
  • Locked
ex-Subway guy, Jared Fogle is gaining back the weight in prison
2
51
9K
213372bu replied
  • Locked
Ex-Subway pitchman Jared Fogle is suing his victim's parents
2 3
123
16K
ColdPizza replied
Top Bottom