Are these montages of 3-5 second fast cuts?
yes, though that particular clip is slightly longer. I think I counted 7-8 seconds.
It's at the start of the last episode
Are these montages of 3-5 second fast cuts?
I did and they are actually 2 separate things
1) Gia Paige, who agreed to be in the documentary and signed a release, is upset because she later asked them not to use her footage and they did anyway in an episode about her boyfriend. They show a facebook photo of them together that includes her first name. She says they did this out of spite because she wouldn't cooperate when they wanted to discuss her family
that's kind of jerkish frfr...
unless she was an awful ex. even still.
what was her model name so I can go apologize.
I did and they are actually 2 separate things
2) The other two women appeared together in a periscope video and HGW used a clip of it in a montage about internet videos. The clip shows one of them saying something random to the camera and the other is in a leotard or something and sort-of shaking her butt? This episode is not about sex work and it isn't implied that they are performing for money (or doing anything explicit). The episode is about the girl who periscoped her friend being raped, so It has a couple of montages about the kind of videos people post online in general. The montages show everything from that guy getting kicked in the head by the train conductor, to some topless woman getting beat up in the streets. I would assume they didn't get permission for any of them as that is pretty normal.
ok i think i'm in the middle of watching this episode. so they are in the montage in episode 6 where they are just talking about people who live stream on periscope, facebook live, and show random clips?
that particular episode wasn't even about camgirls or the porn industry. i guess i understand the part about asking permission but how does that extend to Netflix outting them/giving out real names? there wasn't really any focus on any of the individuals in the montages or screen names or anything that i can recall.
People have been confusing the two issues. They outed Gia's name (her first name at least), they used the footage of the cam girls without permission but didn't name them.
Fucking hell.
How in the fuck do you make a show about sex workers and then deliberately fuck them over?
Jesus Christ.
Have a god damn ounce of compassion and care.
Also, I assume all the fucks who are like "well don't do porn then if you don't want people to know!" I assume you wouldn't mind porn sites telling your family, friends, and co-workers what you are up to and into right? Cause everything you do is all on you?
I agree that the gia Paige thing is fucked up if she asked out but the other thing could just be chalked up to a dumb mistake.
Dumb mistakes aren't cute little accidents when it involves a service watched by millions and millions of people.
You don't just excuse fucking over regular people by saying "ah, slipped up!" I don't care what it is.
Have you watched the episode in question? Just curious because it slightly changed how strongly I felt about what was stated in the article
Have you watched the episode in question? Just curious because it slightly changed how strongly I felt about what was stated in the article
*starts sweating profusely*
People should also know that many cam sites, maybe all of them, provide controls for models to block IPs from certain states, regions or countries from seeing them at all. Many models will block the country or state(s) they are in or that friends/family are in so they are only visible to areas with people who don't know them. Or at the very least the least likely know them.
To take clips from cam shows without permission and put them up on Netflix is beyond fucked up and scummy as is, but couple that with the fact that they are then distributing this show to regions models may have specifically blocked through their platform is doubly fucked.
lol @ yall who can't understand the bubble of being recognized only on myfreecams versus a whole ass netflix series.
People can do online sex work and keep it relatively separate from their personal life. I mean, think about it. When's the last time you saw a porn star you recognized?
I'm no lawyer so I apologize if I'm off the mark here, but how does recording a video from a paid channel and then re-uploading it to another paid service without getting permission from the video owner not violate fair use? Rehosted porn videos get taken down all the time, and those are on free sites, Netflix is a paid service.
This took way too long to be brought up.
Can you do this on periscope?
I don't think the episode in question used any footage from cam sites but I could be wrong. If anyone is interested I believe the clip is around the 3:15 mark of episode 6. Green haired girl with her friend next to a pole.
Wow. "I'm not saying they deserved it, just that they deserved it."I never said they deserved it. I'm saying if you put yourself in a situation where a result is even possible, well that result may just happen. In this case it did.
As one of the primary subjects of Episode 3 of the six-part docu-series on Netflixtitled Owning ItRayne says she has been communicating with the producers, making it clear shes upset with their inclusion of several models personal information in the final cut. That includes her own legal name and the unit number of her condo.
...
They are considering taking my episode down and I think thats proof they realize they messed up, Rayne says. I told them I was upset. I was stern about it. Thats them accepting that they messed up, and I think thats really important. It shows they really didnt mean it.
Ive been apologized to several times. The producer I worked with directly feels terrible and had no idea that would even impact my job. It was just a signature on a piece of artwork and she didnt think it would be noticeable. But I had two fans figure it out. Its just an oversight. It wouldve made sense to blur it out. Same with the unit number on my door.
Reading that other article, these clips were from periscope so not only are they not behind a paywall they are not even from a 'porn' site at all and are freely available to the public. The only real contention I can see is the woman who signed a release and then says she changed her mind as it was her whose name was apparently shown. Without any documentation though, she legally won't have a case, and it is difficult to know if she is telling the truth.I'm no lawyer so I apologize if I'm off the mark here, but how does recording a video from a paid channel and then re-uploading it to another paid service without getting permission from the video owner not violate fair use? Rehosted porn videos get taken down all the time, and those are on free sites, Netflix is a paid service.
Reading that other article, these clips were from periscope so not only are they not behind a paywall they are not even from a 'porn' site at all and are freely available to the public. The only real contention I can see is the woman who signed a release and then says she changed her mind as it was her whose name was apparently shown. Without any documentation though, she legally won't have a case, and it is difficult to know if she is telling the truth.
This took way too long to be brought up.
What sort of social platforms are you telling your family to avoid so they don't see you perform naked? Both Twitter and Instagram are full of these accounts.
Cam sites are recorded all day every day, for anyone expecting there to anonymity of any form on the Wild West that is the internet is absolutely deluded. It's just a matter of time until someone finds it - what you put up there is permanent. And this ignores the existence of VPN's or people accessing the internet from a different location as humans, contrary to popular belief, aren't stuck in one place forever.
That being said, this series, since it itself is making money due to the participation of these models, needs to adhere to their stipulations, even if those stipulations are, as I have just explained, a temporary fix to a long-term problem.
And in an interesting move, the producers have decided to double down and say everyone is either lying or exaggerating:
http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/hot-girls-wanted-criticism-netflix-1202404087/