• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

China's first domestically built aircraft carrier is launched, second overall

Status
Not open for further replies.

Madness

Member
https://twitter.com/PDChina/status/857046980614176768

C-TXqqDV0AAyhX7.jpg


JTPAfHj.jpg


http://www.newsweek.com/china-navy-aircraft-carrier-military-589483

Nearly two years in the making and amid much speculation of its full capabilities, China appears to be getting set to launch its second aircraft carrier, the first to be built in that country.

The ship, which could be named Shandong but has been referred to as CV-17, was first floated off its dry dock Sunday during a ceremony that also served as a celebration of the 68th anniversary of the People’s Liberation Army. Recent photos suggest the new carrier is quite similar to China’s first, the Liaoning, which was purchased from Russia and then refurbished and recommissioned, it weighs 70,000 tons and is 315 meters long and 75 meters wide.

People were expecting it to be launched any day now and People's Daily just confirmed it minutes ago. You may be thinking who cares or getting scared. This is their first domestically built aircraft carrier. The remarkable thing is that they first started it just 2 years ago. It is very similar or identical to the Soviet-era one they purchased from Ukraine with a ski-jump style takeoff. It is conventionally powered and only 70000 tons. This is not going to challenge the US, Japan, SK or even India which is close to finishing its own. But this will be a bane for smaller nations like Vietnam and Philippines. If this is stationed near the ports they are developing near the South China Sea, they have a rather credible deterrent. It won't lead any strike groups and is not entirely blue water capable like the US nuclear aircraft carriers, but this will be designed for easy takeoff of medium bombing jets or upto 28 to 36 J-15 fighters which are carbon copies of the Russian Su-33 which is why they made this aircraft carrier nearly identical to the Soviet designed one theyr purchased. China has always lacked power projection beyond its mainland. Coupled with the stolen land in the South China sea, ports being built in Sri Lanka or Pakistan, and the fact they can knock out of a decent aircraft carrier in under 2 years, they should be able to maintain adequate defense of their maritime areas and trade routes. India definitely needs to be worried. They decommissioned Britain's old one and only have a Soviet-era Russian aircraft carrier themselves. Japan has 4 better 'helicopter' carriers, but China with 2 more of these and maybe even one with a nuclear reactor will pretty much have crazy force projection throughout east-Asia. Thoughts?

qjCrWLg.jpg


Picture of the Shandong aircraft carrier at Dalian ready for launch.

300px-J-15_03.jpg


Picture of the J-15 which China copied exactly from the Russian Su-33. They expect this aircraft carrier may utilize 28 or more of these jets.
 
Clone of the Russian Kutznetsov? Eh, it was advanced in 90s. Plus the ski jump ramp without any catapult system and the Su-33 being a heavy bird makes it that it can't leave fully armed.

Russia even uses theirs as more of a large missile frigate than functionally as an aircraft carrier.

 

RoKKeR

Member
That's seems like an incredibly fast turnaround for a ship that huge.

It also now has me looking up the USS Gerald Ford, which is absolutely insane.
 

ponpo

( ≖‿≖)
Is this one long enough to offset the limited ordnances of planes using the ski jump?

Quote unquote carrier.

I don't don't know much about carriers, but what is wrong with having a ramp? Is it less effective in operations?

Aside from being cheaper and having less engineering, I don't know what advantages ski jump carriers have, but because planes have to get up to speed on their own in a short distance, they can't be that heavy, so they can't carry as many bombs as catapulted ones.
 
is America the only country with a non ramp based carrier?

and I don't mean those small helicopter carrier that can maybe house a harrier (and future F-35B)
 

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
It is very similar or identical to the Soviet-era one they purchased from Ukraine with a ski-jump style takeoff.

Way to fight those stereotypes, China.
 

Madness

Member
Clone of the Russian Kutznetsov? Eh, it was advanced in 90s. Plus the ski jump ramp without any catapult system and the Su-33 being a heavy bird makes it that it can't leave fully armed.

Russia even uses theirs as more of a large missile frigate than functionally as an aircraft carrier.

Nah it is a near carbon copy of the Soviet Varyag they renamed to the Liaoning. It does have more room for more J-15 fighters. This will probably just help with more training, takeoffs and limited power projection around the South China Sea. But a 2 year turnover and near identical is crazy.

According to the Straits Times, the new carrier features the latest equipment, including a bigger hangar to accommodate more J-15 fighters as well as more space on deck for helicopters and other aircraft.

d3IkZ71.jpg


The Liaoning aka Soviet Varyag.
 
I don't don't know much about carriers, but what is wrong with having a ramp? Is it less effective in operations?

Advantage is the launch is less stressful on pilots. Problem is with a heavier plane like the SU-33, the launch speed is only about 120-140 km ph (~85 mph). For comparison a catapult system launches at 170 mph. So it's a very slow launch and they can't fully load the pane because it barely takes off.
 

Madness

Member
Probably have no. 3 being built as we speak.

#3 and #4 are already underway, both conventional reactors so again non-blue water capable but with potential catapult systems for heavier bombers and upto 85000 tons displacement. Ideally, China had stated and knows they need around 6 or more aircraft carriers or strike groups to projecy power like the US.
 

cirrhosis

Member
they can't be that heavy, so they can't carry as many bombs as catapulted ones.

each plane could launch with half of the necessary weapons for a sorting. then one plane could fly alongside another plane and a guy could get out and start moving the other plane's bombs over, then when it's done one goes back to the carrier.

Like refueling but with weapons
 

Madness

Member
Where is that pic of all the Carriers USA has compared to the rest of the world?

Again, not meant to challenge US hegemony or Naval tonnage, but project greater force. Imagine this being docked in the new South China Sea ports, or the Pakistan port. Even with limited engagement, it now poses a credible threat with the ability for fighter jets to take off not from the mainland.

NOwmmqi.jpg


This is the JS Hyuga which is Japan's helicopter carriers, only 20k tonnage, but they have been pushing for F-35 VTOL versions. Imagine they could station 5-10 on each carrier. China has long accused Japan of exactly that goal.

What does "blue water" in this regard mean?

Like someone else already stated, conventiobal reactors are limited by fuel and engine use. They cannot be away from ports or operate independently. The US nuclear carriers can be at sea fot hundreds of days with its nuclear reactor powering everything and for 2-3 months at a time without resupply as well. So they are considered blue water in that they can be deep in the Pacific with no need to quickly return to port or be stranded.
 

ponpo

( ≖‿≖)
Again, not meant to challenge US hegemony or Naval tonnage, but project greater force. Imagine this being docked in the new South China Sea ports, or the Pakistan port. Even with limited engagement, it now poses a credible threat with the ability for fighter jets to take off not from the mainland.

NOwmmqi.jpg


This is the JS Hyuga which is Japan's helicopter carriera, only 20k tonnage, but they have been pushing for F-35 VTOL versions. Imagine they could station 5-10 on each carrier. China has long accused Japan of exactly that goal.

You mean helicopter destroyer ;;;;)))))
 

ZOONAMI

Junior Member
Wonder how long until they have a nuclear carrier. I'd wager 10 years. So seriously we are potentially looking at china rolling with 5-10 diesel powered carriers and 1-2 nuclear carriers by 2030 or so. Nuts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom