Andrew Korenchkin
Member
Serious question, history-gaf. What Is the argument about, anyway?
I've always been curious what historians think?
I've always been curious what historians think?
Pitt The ElderLord Palmerston.
Lord Palmerston.
Okay, okay they're both great teams.Pitt The Elder
Better question: Sid Hoffman or Sid Frenchman?
The blood is so funny
Pitt Senior because Palmerston was a nationalist
What is going on in this thread? I'm very confused.
This thread is a reference to the Simpsons episode where Barney Gumble and Wade Boggs (rip) argue over the thread title with Barney eventually knocking out Boggs.
Thread never stood a chance.
This thread is a reference to the Simpsons episode where Barney Gumble and Wade Boggs (rip) argue over the thread title with Barney eventually knocking out Boggs.
Thread never stood a chance.
What is going on in this thread? I'm very confused.
You may have gigantismI dont know whats going on
Who cares about those cheese eating surrender monkeys.Pitt the Elder.
One could make the argument that if Pitt and his cabinet had not contributed to Britain's triumph in the Seven Years War, then the American .. and subsequently the French Revolution would not have occurred.
You may have gigantism
The above gif is Barney getting knocked out by Joe Frazier in an unrelated argument. Barney actually won his altercation with Wade Boggs.
We're talkin' softball.
What is going on in this thread? I'm very confused.
I don't know what's going on
The above gif is Barney getting knocked out by Joe Frazier in an unrelated argument. Barney actually won his altercation with Wade Boggs.
The answer is obvious. If Pitt the Elder was really that great, he wouldn't require the "Elder" qualification.