Support NeoGAF

Cerium · Sep 14, 2017

https://twitter.com/pixelpar/status/908279978332221442

Obviously the graphics took a hit but it's impressive for what it is, particularly in close up shots like these.

Thatanas · Sep 14, 2017

Very respectable IMO.

Pop-O-Matic · Sep 14, 2017

Switch version looks like a launch 360 game. Scust.

get2sammyb · Sep 14, 2017

Why are the PS4 shots so low-res and blurry? This doesn't seem like a great comparison to me...

KennyLinder · Sep 14, 2017

Have they said if it runs at 60 on Switch?

Ladekabel · Sep 14, 2017

Looks alright. Lightning is weaker and some details are missing. What framerate did Doom run on PS4/XBO?

Fat4all · Sep 14, 2017

not as bad as I though it might of been

fastmower · Sep 14, 2017

Looking good.

Guymelef · Sep 14, 2017

We don't even know if that's Switch version.
Resolution? Frame Rate?

Jonneh3003 · Sep 14, 2017

Quite an amazing accomplishment. There are clear differences but not drastic ones. Amazing work from Bethesda!

BigEmil · Sep 14, 2017

KennyLinder said:
Have they said if it runs at 60 on Switch?

That's what I want to know, is it still 60fps?
I'd be even more impressed if this is 60fps with these visuals

Scrawnton · Sep 14, 2017

"Hawk, Bethesda is the One."

Loris146 · Sep 14, 2017

Not bad. Framerate?

hoserx · Sep 14, 2017

Pop-O-Matic said:
Switch version looks like a launch 360 game. Scust.

What? Also what does "scust" mean?

Jaded Alyx · Sep 14, 2017

get2sammyb said:
Why are the PS4 shots so low-res and blurry? This doesn't seem like a great comparison to me...

They are all probably taken from YouTube videos, so not a completely fair comparison either way.

Fliesen · Sep 14, 2017

Guymelef said:
We don't even know if that's Switch version.
Resolution? Frame Rate?

Doom has dynamic resolution, right?

So let's hope it's dynamic at 60fps

Stygr · Sep 14, 2017

Ladekabel said:
Looks alright. Lightning is weaker and some details are missing. What framerate did Doom run on PS4/XBO?

60 fps

Kingpin Rogers · Sep 14, 2017

Are we sure that the Switch gameplay was actually Switch gameplay?

kraspkibble · Sep 14, 2017

impressive! we need to remind ourselves that this is running on a handheld device and not a PS4 or PC.

MatthewMungall · Sep 14, 2017

Are these taken from the Direct last night? If so, I don't really think that's a fair comparison and we should wait for uncompressed footage.

EvilKatarn · Sep 14, 2017

Love tech comparisons from 300kbps streams.

Jaded Alyx · Sep 14, 2017

Guymelef said:
We don't even know if that's Switch version.

What else would it be? It was clearly not PS4/XBO footage. Did they run the pc version at lower settings to put in the Nintendo Direct?

eizarus · Sep 14, 2017

Pop-O-Matic said:
Switch version looks like a launch 360 game. Scust.

Dafuq.. .

Kenzodielocke · Sep 14, 2017

MatthewMungall said:
Are these taken from the Direct last night? If so, I don't really think that's a fair comparison and we should wait for uncompressed footage.

The PS4 screens are also compressed.

Also lol at the sizes for the comparison. Useless. Let's wait for next week.

Jonneh3003 · Sep 14, 2017

Kingpin Rogers said:
Are we sure that the Switch gameplay was actually Switch gameplay?

Almost positive as it's out in a few months.

gcubed · Sep 14, 2017

The first thing I thought when I saw the direct was not bad for the switch. It's definitely softer and blurrier but if it's the same game, who cares

Bamboo ç«¹ · Sep 14, 2017

Kingpin Rogers said:
Are we sure that the Switch gameplay was actually Switch gameplay?

Uhhh, the game is coming this year so I don't see the point of showing another built.

Coreda · Sep 14, 2017

* Pictured actual size

CHC · Sep 14, 2017

Given the screen size (assuming undocked) it seems like it will be a negligible difference for most double dippers once it's up and running. And for new players, I think it looks pretty good.

Dark Cloud · Sep 14, 2017

Pop-O-Matic said:
Switch version looks like a launch 360 game. Scust.

Not really. It looks like a launch GameCube game tbh.

/s

JoeInky · Sep 14, 2017

hoserx said:
What? Also what does "scust" mean?

It's slang for disgusting.

It's also the hint that he's being sarcastic.

WonderzL · Sep 14, 2017

It can be done if the publisher actually wants it.

Take that, Capcom and your "tests".

Sebastiano · Sep 14, 2017

It looks alright here but in some footage, especially when we see shooting, it's really different but still good for a console like the Switch. Curious to see a future good comparison.

blu · Sep 14, 2017

dammit

sinonobu · Sep 14, 2017

I mean press embargo ends next week right?

Let's wait and see

Dwight Schrute · Sep 14, 2017

Impressive... is it 60 fps ?

low-G · Sep 14, 2017

Using super low res, compressed screens for a comparison thread?

CHC · Sep 14, 2017

If you're a Switch user I wouldn't hold your breath for 60 FPS. It could happen but it seems.... pretty ambitious to me.

Jonneh3003 · Sep 14, 2017

low-G said:
Using super low res, compressed screens for a comparison thread?

They still give you a fair idea of how it looks.

PsihoPerihelion · Sep 14, 2017

Looks really good for the hardware, but I want to know the framerate is running.

Pop-O-Matic said:
Switch version looks like a launch 360 game. Scust.

Here's a launch 360 title:

Say that shit again, please.

ffvorax · Sep 14, 2017

I just hope it's 60fps, because it's one of the best things of the game! Better 60fps than graphic in this case.

DieH@rd · Sep 14, 2017

Pointless when comparison is stamp-sized.

orioto · Sep 14, 2017

From my pov those "switch" screens could be the ps4 one really compressed and slightly darker lol. I would wait to judge..

Dark Cloud · Sep 14, 2017

sinonobu said:
I mean press embargo ends next week right?

Let's wait and see

Interesting. I didn't know this

ozfunghi · Sep 14, 2017

The lighting being less pronounced makes it feel more natural to me. So that's fine by me. The third image, even in an image this small, does show noticable changes, less crispy.

low-G · Sep 14, 2017

Jonneh3003 said:
They still give you a fair idea of how it looks.

Well I haven't played it on PS4 (only PC), but I'd disagree with that generally. You lose a TON of texture detail with low res + compression.

Fbh · Sep 14, 2017

Going to wait until we have more footage and higher res pics for a real comparison.

But it's a less powerful console so a graphical downgrade is obvious. It's still awesome that we are getting this on a portable console.

Kingpin Rogers said:
Are we sure that the Switch gameplay was actually Switch gameplay?

It's comming out this year so there is definitely a version of the game already running on the switch.

It also looked worse than the Ps4/X1 version which would only leave the option of it either being the actual switch version (which makes the most sense) or the PC version with the graphical setting turned way down.

SmokedMeat · Sep 14, 2017

If it's not 60fps I'll pass or wait for it to hit the bargain bin. I think it'll hit 60fps though, simply because Doom's engine is magic.

faridmon · Sep 14, 2017

All I care about is whether its 60 fps. I would take a substantial graphical hit if it guerntees stable FPS

Pop-O-Matic said:
Switch version looks like a launch 360 game. Scust.

What The fuck?

Are you saying that this looks like Project Dark Zero?

What is wrong with some people?

eso76 · Sep 14, 2017

eh, hard to tell at that size but it looks close and very good

Support NeoGAF

DOOM PS4 / Switch Comparison Shots

Member

Member

Banned

Member

Member

Member

Banned

Member

Member

Banned

Junior Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Banned

Member

Permabanned.

Member

Member

Member

Banned

Banned

Banned

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Banned

Member

Wants the largest console games publisher to avoid Nintendo's platforms.

Banned

Member

Member

Member

Banned

Member

Member

Banned

Good Art

Member

Member

Member

Member

Gamer™

Member

Member

Similar threads

Good Art