|
GAF's Bob Woodward
(01-03-2013, 07:36 AM)
|
Sony has researched new tech for suppressing second-hand game sales
#1
So I believe this is interesting in light of a prior rumour about Sony limiting second hand game sales on PS4.
Sony has been working on new technology for limiting used game sales, and has applied for a patent. The patent was filed 09/12/2012 by SCEJ. Perhaps this work is where the rumour came from. Or perhaps it independently corroborates the rumour. Link: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2013/0007892.html Anyway, here's some of the relevant detail:
Quote:
Quote:
I suppose I should say that this doesn't mean PS4 will, for sure, restrict second hand games. This would not be the first time Sony registered patents in this area and then did nothing with the tech. In fact I remember a patent fueling rumours prior to PS3's launch. The decision would be a business one, not one based on technical feasibility. This system would be relatively expensive to implement vs network-DRM. Although it could have the double effect of limiting piracy - at least until pirates could hack or reproduce the 'rf tag' system. The last official comment we had from someone at Sony was Jack Tretton's "'for the record, I'm totally opposed to blocking used games." - but maybe people would be better reassured by a comment from SCEJ... So with those qualifications out of the way, have at it :P edit - since it's causing some confusion, the application refers to a system that can tie a game to your user ID (i.e. your account), or a machine ID via the RF tag. For people wondering what would happen if your console died etc.
Last edited by gofreak; 01-03-2013 at 09:46 AM.
|
|
|
|
He's not our sharpest knife. In fact, he's one of our dullest.
(01-03-2013, 07:38 AM)
|
#3
It would require all consoles to have an internet connection in order to play a game. That alone will keep it from being used.
|
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:40 AM)
|
#6
Even if it gets implemented, I believe such technology is only viable if all platform holders use it. If either one system implements it without the other then they're essentially fucked. Way too much negative PR and anti-consumerism for one system to go with when the other exists without it.
|
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:40 AM)
|
#10
Unless I misread the OP, this system works independent of an internet connection. It's between the disc and the console itself. Don't know how the tech itself works, however.
Last edited by MuseManMike; 01-03-2013 at 07:45 AM.
|
|
GAF's Bob Woodward
(01-03-2013, 07:41 AM)
|
#14
Quote:
|
|
He's not our sharpest knife. In fact, he's one of our dullest.
(01-03-2013, 07:44 AM)
|
#18
|
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:46 AM)
|
#24
I still can't believe they're even considering something like this. The backlash from retailers alone would be huge, not to mention all the bad press they would get. I only buy games new but this is still indefensible. Not even being able to borrow a game from a friend is insane.
|
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:47 AM)
|
#25
this. There are enough console games out there to play for the rest of my life. I don't give a fcuk about the corporate apologies, I will not buy into it. Full stop.
|
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:47 AM)
|
#26
Sony might just call it quits if they implement an anti used game system into PS4.
No used games No Backward compatibility (rumored/possible) Launching last (rumored) Come on Sony. Damn the Patriots! |
|
He's not our sharpest knife. In fact, he's one of our dullest.
(01-03-2013, 07:50 AM)
|
#32
|
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:50 AM)
|
#35
Used games have been long gone from PC ages ago because of retailers refusing to even take back (or allow trade credits for) PC games because you can just install them and return them. What exactly is the problem here?
I guess you could argue that since STEAM is around then there's no need for a used games market on PC :P |
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:52 AM)
|
#39
|
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:52 AM)
|
#41
I mainly wait until the games are dirt cheap before buying anyway. I haven't sold/traded a game in years, and I only did so because goozex made it so easy. Now Goozex is dead to me, I got out with 0 credits remaining. Flawless victory.
Also my main system will always be PC. It's just too convenient for me. |
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:52 AM)
|
#42
And anything short of a Steam-esque situation is completely unacceptable to me (and I don't particularly want the Steam model on consoles either), I don't want my games tied down to a system that could well break down or be unable to EVER get a game after a certain point short of full blown piracy just because there aren't enough copies out in the wild and I didn't get it ASAP. I've said it before, but if Microsoft and Sony do implement this kind of system I will want Nintendo to completely destroy both, they'd either need to be humbled or driven out entirely. I suspect it may be too costly to merit the effort though, not unless it's pennies to stick this kind of tech on a disc. |
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:53 AM)
|
#44
If this happens i know what it will mean for me. Basically i would just go digital only (probably PC only actually) and i would only be retail games if i was sure i would get a shit load of use out of it. Basically i would end up spending a whole lot less money on games.
|
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:54 AM)
|
#45
i only buy a handful of console games every year now due to PC, and im ok with paying full price day one because i know i can trade/sell back if need be, if sony thinks everyone is going to continue happily paying full price day one with the opportunity to trade/sell back taken away, they are sadly mistaken.
Last edited by iNvid02; 01-03-2013 at 07:59 AM.
|
|
He's not our sharpest knife. In fact, he's one of our dullest.
(01-03-2013, 07:54 AM)
|
#46
Agreed. I don't buy used games, but i would refuse to buy a system that did this out of sheer principle.
|
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:54 AM)
|
#47
For instance, in some retail stores they're experimenting with tagging all products to allow for easier access to take inventory and to cut down on things like shoplifting (though if someone's determined enough, they'll obviously figure out a way). Eh, looking at something like eShop prices for Nintendo's digital stores (where this is the case), I don't think that approach holds any ground with a majority of consumers. They'll be against it.
Last edited by Thoraxes; 01-03-2013 at 07:56 AM.
|
|
Member
(01-03-2013, 07:54 AM)
|
#48
As much as I oppose this and am for rights to resell things you buy it makes sense if you're making a 50 million euro product.
It would be much better though then instead of coming up with ways to BAN it they would come up with ways to get a piece of that resell pie. Like send your game back in and get 50% of a future purchase or something (within some time period). That way they would stop the flow of games to the 2nd hand market and tie the customer down for the future. Win/win.
Last edited by 99%; 01-03-2013 at 07:56 AM.
|
|
Maxis Redwood
(01-03-2013, 07:55 AM)
|
#50
I'd like to see this become standard across all consoles. My one problem with it pertains to preserving games for future generations once they go out of print. Ideally there'd be some sort of kill switch that'd be activated after a period of time to allow games to be sold/played as used. If some games were doomed to become lost to time (digital downloads aren't enough - there are titles so niche that they'll never make it there) it'd be a deal breaker to me.
|