Comparison to X360 version/Impressions from hands on(Youtube)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGUceG0yUPg&channel=VideoGamerTV
More here - http://www.videogamer.com/ps4/sleep..._is_1080p_30fps_on_both_ps4_and_xbox_one.html
Lock if old.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
United Front Games handling Sleeping Dogs:DE, 1080p30fps PS4/XB1, Brief hands on VG
- Thread starter Kayant
- Start date
Comparison to X360 version/Impressions from hands on(Youtube)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGUceG0yUPg&channel=VideoGamerTV
More here - http://www.videogamer.com/ps4/sleep..._is_1080p_30fps_on_both_ps4_and_xbox_one.html
Lock if old.
Savantcore
Unconfirmed Member
Doesn't matter; full price.
Liamario
Banned
It runs at a fairly solid 60fps on my 7850, so to hear they've locked it to 30fps for the sake of a few textures is disappointing. I personally found the game to be a lot more enjoyable at 60fps due to the arcade style gameplay. I'm not seeing anything in that trailer that justifies 30fps.
LOL ridiculous.
LOL ridiculous.
It's the Videogame equivalent to the "before and after" shots where the customer is smiling in the after shot and frowning in the before shot.
Alcoholikaust
Member
Game went from moderately interested to no thanks- why pay 60 bucks for this?
game runs at 1080p at a constant 60 fps on a decent pc- not to mention its been 5-15 bucks on the regular for a while. with all dlc included. :/
game runs at 1080p at a constant 60 fps on a decent pc- not to mention its been 5-15 bucks on the regular for a while. with all dlc included. :/
Liamario
Banned
Solid 60fps for 95% of the time.
Impeccable
Member
In my opinion the game wasn't interesting enough to play again because it's been up-ported but the fact it's not even a good port is seriously scary.
Windom Earle
Member
Even mid-range cards can handle the PC version at 60fps nowadays... Disappointing.
Also comparing it to 360 version? Please.
Also comparing it to 360 version? Please.
That's why we should wait for half price somewhere on 2015
mangochutney
Member
Nixxes am cry. They did a pretty good job with TR
E for PS4 and PC. United Front's Xbox One version wasn't so hot, but then hard to tell who's fault that was.
Lets hope they turn out something decent.
E for PS4 and PC. United Front's Xbox One version wasn't so hot, but then hard to tell who's fault that was.Lets hope they turn out something decent.
My 7850 and i5 2500 ran the game at 60fps very well with only a few dips here and there.
Derpcrawler
Member
2500k would destroy both Xbox One and PS4 CPUs combined even if they ran at 4-5Ghz. Some of Intel Atom CPUs are more powerful than XB1/PS4 CPUs.
Canis lupus
Member
Why didn't Nixxes do the PS4 port? They got Tomb Raider DE to 1080p60fps. UFG handled the Xbone port and they got stuck with 30fps. 30fps for a last gen port, ridiculous. DE barely looks better than the original version.
Hip Hop
Member
still too expensive
Nixxes am cry. They did a pretty good job with TR
Wait, what? this was the same company that did the X1 port for DE?
Black Mantis
Member
Upgrades aren't enough for me to buy this again, plus I did pretty much everything first time around and there really isn't that much to do in the world. Might get it, if it becomes part of GWG or PS+ in the future.
Well that's a tad odd seeing as my old moderately overclocked Q6600 and SLI GTX480 combo ran the originial PC version bar Extreme AA at 1920x1080 in the 70ish region. Even a single 480 turning down their SSAO implementation as well and further AA cutbacks was good for in and around 60fps.
Oh and for everyone mentioning Nixxes and Tomb Raider, I'd imagine it because they handled the original PC port where as Crystal Dyanamics did the PS3 and 360 versions. Every version of Sleeping Dogs released have been done by United Front Games as it's their in house engine.
Oh and for everyone mentioning Nixxes and Tomb Raider, I'd imagine it because they handled the original PC port where as Crystal Dyanamics did the PS3 and 360 versions. Every version of Sleeping Dogs released have been done by United Front Games as it's their in house engine.
KyanMehwulfe
Member
The new rain effects look good (and as others said make the comparison useless) but I don't see much changing in lighting, shadows, or the character models. In fact I don't know if I could even see any difference in character models in a Youtube video... original console versions already had great face models and this video didn't really look any different. And I would have preferred 60 FPS I think.. I'm OK with 30 FPS for something perhaps more cinematic like GTA (slightly less arcade-y driving) but SD is pretty twitchy. I'm still Day 1 regardless just because I'm too fan of a SD/open world fan and I still play SD to this day, so I'll get value out of it regardless of price... but doesn't really look like a $60 upgrade so far based the standard other games are not setting.
This is a tiny bit hard to believe. I played the game on a GTX 460m, and I eeked out some decent performance at 720p 30 with bells and whistles. You must have sacrificed a lot to run it like that consistently with no dips.
brickarts295
Member
For a guy who fully supports Definitive/Remaster editions coming to PS4/ONE, I'm disappointed that this game can't even run at 60fps especially with that $60 price tag. I guess that if SD can't even hit 60fps then GTA V most likely won't.
I'll buy it, but I'll wait till it's like $20-30, seems fair since I didn't play the DLC's
I'll buy it, but I'll wait till it's like $20-30, seems fair since I didn't play the DLC's
Played at high settings, FXAA, 16xAA, but I did put shadows on low if I recall correctly. My laptop also has an i7 processor of that era @2.8 gHz, perhaps that helped as well.
Liquid-San
Member
Looks a lot like the PC version maxed out..... Only things that seem to have been upgraded are the car models and the streets themselves. Granted, it is only a portion of the game.
LiquidSolid
Member
30fps, full price and the sequel is some MMO bullshit that isn't even coming to consoles. What's the point?
Yes. They worked on the XB1 port, and Nixxes(bless their souls) worked on the PS4 port.
I'm assuming they figured rushing this out to market with some small small changes, all DLC and higher PC settings was enough.
Compared to GTA5 remastered, this looks like a joke by comparison. Low resolution textures everywhere, no upgraded character models, the car handling is still terrible...man.
KyanMehwulfe
Member
yeah, i don't really see it either. UFG says they upgraded them but i don't notice much difference. maybe the clothing looks a bit better? the video did seem to think a jacket was improved so maybe some of the clothing has noticeably improved textures.
that'd be good... the faces already looked great so that mostly just needed better lighting. but better clothes would be great. best thing about the character models other than the faces in cutscenes was the damage model (namely blood and bruises) to your body... so more realistic tank tops to get all bloody would be a great addition.
we'll see though when it arrives. wonder if Winston Chu will look even more real... I have a friend who's the spitting image of Winston right down to the dyed hair, clothing, and arm tattoos. even fits the steroids joke and drives an X6 (admittedly more of a Chinese stereotype than a HK/SD stereotype). sort of made me care about the SD story even more in an odd familiarity sort of way.
sometimes i'm surprised SD wasn't made by a HK developer. I mean, Vancouver has Richmond but... SD gets so many stereotypes and details right.
Mihael Mello Keehl
Banned
Suprised thats not 60 frames.. oh well