The statement from the CD guy saying they still appreciate their Playstation fan base is insulting enough...Tomb Raider 2013 managed to disappoint old school fans of the series, and this Xbox exclusivity pisses off their new Playstation and PC fans.
I have faith that Squenix has it in them to insult their remaining audience somehow.
Yet again MS would rather buy exclusivity than to beef up their internal studios. Assuming this deal cost MS at least $100 million, that's 3-5 potentially high profile first party games they decided not to fund.
You love what Tomb Raider was. Tomb Raider is what Tomb Raider is today, and it could at any time dig back to what it has been. There is no circle, just a wall of denial and a wish for failure. I don't blame fans for not liking what it is, but those kinds of wishes are just ugly, really.
lol 100 million, do we just guess and throw out random numbers?
Stunning. Is this another Titan Fall or Bayonetta 2 situation where the project would have been shelved if one of the Big 3 didn't moneyhat it? Is Square Enix in that much trouble financially? I'm OK with exclusivity (timed or otherwise) if that's the case.
If not, then it would be sickening if MS just gave SE millions to turn a multiplatform title into an exclusive. If that's the case, it would suggest that they can't compete with their underpowered box and have decided to take away content from the competition, rather than provide compelling content of their own. AKA the EA Madden strategy.
We'll have to see. If it's the former, then good job MS for saving this game, even if I can't play it. If it's the latter, then I would suggest a boycott for this title.
I am confused, we dont know who paid for what, how much was paid or anything solid.... and why the double standard with sony? they get an exclusive in the ps3 days or now and its great, nobody questions money or the business involved.
Now here is another thing, regardless of what system it was exclusive for, it would LOSE sales.... if it was ps4 exclusive it would lose out on 5-6 million xbox ones out there.
If uncharted was not exclusive it would sell more, if halo was not exclusive it would sell more.
Everyone comments as if they know the business behind this deal, but lets not forget or confuse one thing, both systems have exclusives that i wish were on the other system...nobody are yelling about the lost sales of no mans land or day z?
I def dont know the business behind any exclusive deals, or times exclusives and id bet 99% of you dont either, so why not just enjoy the games you have one whatever system you have instead of the conspiracy theory.... MS isnt apple or google, but if they have loads of cash and could buy sony or any game company they really wanted...that is what id say is crossing the moneyhat line.
LOL, come on. No one isn't going to purchase this because of spite. Most people are upset out of principle of this (moneyhatting sucks) but it won't affect people's buying habits.But thats the thing. They won't. They will buy and recommend used sales just to spite. Do u not see the anger in this thread =P
I am confused, we dont know who paid for what, how much was paid or anything solid.... and why the double standard with sony? they get an exclusive in the ps3 days or now and its great, nobody questions money or the business involved.
Now here is another thing, regardless of what system it was exclusive for, it would LOSE sales.... if it was ps4 exclusive it would lose out on 5-6 million xbox ones out there.
If uncharted was not exclusive it would sell more, if halo was not exclusive it would sell more.
Because it gets a strong yank as far as exclusives go. Grabbing a game that's predecessor sold 2:1 on a competing system is a good move. Better option than many other franchises.
The poster you quoted listed it as an assumption, they didn't try pass it off as fact. In lack of other evidence, you can generally make assumptions. Is it reasonable? Quite possibly. The lost revenue from missing PC + PS sales will be massive, even if it is only timed.
The key thing to this is that you can say that for ANY exclusive that sony has... or is the missing revenue only because its a Xbox exclusive..
Shouldn't thread title get changed? Developer tweet makes it sound like a permanent exclusive.
Tomb Raider 2013 managed to disappoint old school fans of the series, and this Xbox exclusivity pisses off their new Playstation and PC fans.
I have faith that Squenix has it in them to insult their remaining audience somehow.
I question how much this type of move really accomplishes for MS and SE.
MS spent a ton of cash on this and I'm not sure this will do anything to flip more than a handful of PS4 purchases into Xbox ones. Tomb Raider isn't the type of title that carries that much weight these days and one game is never enough to make waves for more than a few weeks at best, in terms of console sales.
SE is going to have a ton of pissed off Sony fans for quite some time. More importantly, they crippled the sales potential of this title by excluding more than a hundred million potential customers (PS3, PS4, PC). By the time this game does come out, all hype will be down the drain and it will probably struggle to move a fraction of the copies it could have shifted if it had released at the same time.
Both companies should enjoy the afterglow of this deal as much as possible because the long term outcomes are going to be pretty disappointing.
What exclusives Sony has? First party? What?
The key thing to this is that you can say that for ANY exclusive that sony has... or is the missing revenue only because its a Xbox exclusive..
It's lame but both parties do it. Sony moneyhatted the hell out of Bungie and whoever makes No Man's Sky.
I mean, no company is exempt. Just look at exclusives. Who is to say Nintendo games can't be on other hardware? But no, Nintendo wants its platform to reap the benefits of exclusives.
IMO a lot of people are just mad because they declared their "allegiance" this generation and Microsoft is managing to do a damn good job with software. Its pretty simple, really.
People always question exclusivity deals.
The thing is no one wants this game to be exclusive to any platform, since you know, the first one in the new series came to everything but WiiU.
Completely different circumstances.
ton of cash...assumption, and considering how much money ms has, its a drop in the bucket.
No, it's not, why are you being so obtuse?
This is not a first party game, this is a third party game which was multiplatform and most of the fans are on PS/PC (see sales). The difference is so big I don't understand how you are not able to see it.
I want OG Tomb Raider to return, and the only possible way that happens is if it dies in this form.
Such a pet peeve of mine. MS does not have infinite funds.
edit: And please stop posting over what you are quoting, it is confusing.
I am confused, we dont know who paid for what, how much was paid or anything solid.... and why the double standard with sony? they get an exclusive in the ps3 days or now and its great, nobody questions money or the business involved.
Now here is another thing, regardless of what system it was exclusive for, it would LOSE sales.... if it was ps4 exclusive it would lose out on 5-6 million xbox ones out there.
If uncharted was not exclusive it would sell more, if halo was not exclusive it would sell more.
Everyone comments as if they know the business behind this deal, but lets not forget or confuse one thing, both systems have exclusives that i wish were on the other system...nobody are yelling about the lost sales of no mans land or day z?
I def dont know the business behind any exclusive deals, or times exclusives and id bet 99% of you dont either, so why not just enjoy the games you have one whatever system you have instead of the conspiracy theory.... MS isnt apple or google, but if they have loads of cash and could buy sony or any game company they really wanted...that is what id say is crossing the moneyhat line.
Square should take that cash and do a Lara Croft Collection. Remaster all of the originals for the PS4.
The poster you quoted listed it as an assumption, they didn't try pass it off as fact. In lack of other evidence, you can generally make assumptions. Is it reasonable? Quite possibly. The lost revenue from missing PC + PS sales will be massive, even if it is only timed.
Squenix would only remaster Angel of Darkness
Tomb Raider 2013 is amazing. Cant wait for the sequel. Sorry Sony fans, you will miss a lot of incredible games staying just with Sony.
I take issue with the fact that the game was almost certainly in development for every console under the sun - or at the very least, PC/XB1/PS4. Porting between these 3 systems has to be easier than ever (or at least, no more difficult than it was last gen).
So either SE approached MS, or visa versa, and they began talking about co-marketing deals etc and now we have an exclusive for XB1 only.
Wow, I just read about it. So is it permanent or timed?
Tomb Raider 2013 is amazing. Cant wait for the sequel. Sorry Sony fans, you will miss a lot of incredible games staying just with Sony.