Damn you, looks like in playing jak 2 tonightNaughty Dog has lost their touch, very disappointing...
Watched on my plasma and dies look better.
It's good, but not that good. It could be magnificent!
I am sure you cant. Hope you are not readying some Unity shots for that thread as well and begging people to be impressed.
Damn you, looks like in playing jak 2 tonight
Again. Its perfectly valid to say Xbox One version or PS4 version of Unity looks better to someone than say this current pre-alpha version of UC4 does.
This doesn't look like a mediocre game to me (Xbox One version):
Well, my mind was blown. I watched the HD footage about ten times now.
Hyped as fuck.
Small gif from my own
For me it's already the most beautiful game ever.
Based on those pics, it does not look better than UC4 models in any way possible.... it looks like generational difference to me, IMHO.
How so if I may ask? What about it makes it most beautiful ever?
Based on those pics, it does not look better than UC4 models in any way possible.... it looks like generational difference to me, IMHO.
The foliage looks damn good, for a start.
Small gif from my own
Wut. I need to put some screen of your precious Unity in the gameplay to show how wrong are you?Can we stop comparing cutscene models and compare models in actual gameplay? Because once we go there, UC4 isn't very impressive at all.
The animations do blend superbly with each other. I'm guessing they're interpolated.I really enjoyed how he primed the gun after grabbing it.
The foliage looks damn good, for a start.
Can we stop comparing cutscene models and compare models in actual gameplay? Because once we go there, UC4 isn't very impressive at all.
Yes, the foliage does look good. But that makes it the best looking game ever? Really? Sounds more like someone that WANTS it to be the best looking game ever as opposed to it being a really good looking game with exceptional foliage.
For me it's already the most beautiful game ever.
And the way the animations flow so seamlessly yet without any of that artificial quality that so many games have.
The water effects, from the waterfall to the trickling streams running down the rockfaces are also all very nice.
Yes, the foliage does look good. But that makes it the best looking game ever? Really? Sounds more like someone that WANTS it to be the best looking game ever as opposed to it being a really good looking game with exceptional foliage.
First game is in top five fps of all time.
Small gif from my own
I don't know if it's the best looking game ever. I never got to see Crysis 3 fully cranked, and Crysis 2 looked beyond incredible with the DX11 shit, so I imagine C3 is still a notable step above this, but it is the best looking thing on PS4 I've seen.
Game is still impressive, it just didn't shut down everything else on console this gen like ND has in the past. Which is good, it'll force them to step it up. If the game launches at 30 I expect it'll look substantially better than this demo, if it's 60 then it'll be impressive by that merit.Can we stop comparing cutscene models and compare models in actual gameplay? Because once we go there, UC4 isn't very impressive at all.
He said beautiful, not best, VFX.
I'd reorganize the argument.
Game is still impressive, it just didn't shut down everything else on console this gen like ND has in the past. Which is good, it'll force them to step it up. If the game launches at 30 I expect it'll look substantially better than this demo, if it's 60 then it'll be impressive by that merit.
I didn't find that out with a quick google search. Anyway if it has skin/eye subsurface scattering, I think it's not nearly on the same level as UC4.Instead of assuming You can educate Yourself, its not that hard.
I did use the exact same image you quoted... (sYslH7b.jpg)You would probably want to use a better non-compressed picture for comparison
I can't even go that far from a 15-minute gameplay video. I love how the Order 1886 looks. Several other games look very good on PS4 too.. Dragon Age, Witcher 3, DriveClub and some others.
You're comparing cutscene assets to multiplayer assets, U3 uses a different set of models in mp. U2 mp had a number of different lighting conditions and obviously aren't the same as sp, and you're showing Laz in mp.
U3 sp lighting and assets are much better than the one you're showing on the bottom right.
Rewatched gamesryde video. I'll remain on my statement that it looks better than Crysis 3. There are some thing Crysis does better but on whole this looks better. Crysis 3 may be 2 years old but its still ome of the best looking game
Game is still impressive, it just didn't shut down everything else on console this gen like ND has in the past. Which is good, it'll force them to step it up. If the game launches at 30 I expect it'll look substantially better than this demo, if it's 60 then it'll be impressive by that merit.
Can we stop comparing cutscene models and compare models in actual gameplay? Because once we go there, UC4 isn't very impressive at all.
Sorry, you are correct these are the multiplayer realtime models.
Here is a comparison of Drake with the single player model.
In an interview here is what Naughty Dog said when asked are the in-game models any different from the cutscene models?
"Nope, the in game models are the exact same models that are used in the cutscenes. They also use the exact same textures. There really is no difference between them at all.
The only difference between the cutscenes and in game is a little higher quality lighting and shadowing. Hopefully not too noticeably different. We really wanted to keep the players immersed as much as possible. This meant using the same assets across the board."
IMO, the lighting and shadowing are a little lower for the gameplay footage, but that's just my opinion. I still think it is amazing what Naughty Dog achieved here.
In several threads you'll come in and argue about a games graphics aggressively.
It amazes me that this is 1080p/60 and open world
I agree with you. I just think that the "best graphics ever" and "not impressive" hyperbole from both sides is ridiculous.It's not going to shut down everything like last gen not because ND is slipping, but because Sony shipped a box that doesn't require arcane secrets obtained by a pact with satan to squeeze great performance out. X86 soc with wimpy CPU has the opposite problem to Cell where they're looking at making the GPU do CPU work instead of getting graphical effects running on the SPEs.
Sony first party looked head and shoulders above its peers on PS3 because of a better understanding of the technology and games that catered to the weird but powerful processor. First party Microsoft stuff didn't have the same advantage over third parties, but this was arguably a strength of the platform. I still have flashbacks to "we deliberately made PS3 hard to program for so we would get a lot of life out of the platform" PR nonsense.
Out of curiousity, are you considering this a cutscene model?
What the hell is your problem man? In several threads you'll come in and argue about a games graphics aggressively. On top of that this thread is about gameplay, why do you have such a hard on to praise all things PC? I remember you shutting up the Killzone thread too. Smh
Edit: sorry for going off, totally thought I was in the gameplay discussion thread lol. My bad man. Carry on.
Kudos to them but it looks way worse than Uncharted 4. They are completely different games however.