Pro from Dover
Member
In context, that image is of Joker's "One bad day."
Wait...Jim's real name is STANTON?!?
...everything I know is a LIE!!!
If they represent themselves they have no chance at all judging by that interview.
Jim Sterling should start his own funding campaign for this and once it all dries up, donate it to charity.
These guys are a never ending source of entertainment.
So if he wins then he has the right to counter sue for legal fees and if he has a good enough lawyer they could usually get more and chalk it up to emotional distress. But yeah his lawyer is likely already getting a countersuit ready in the case they win.What would probably happen if they went through with the lawsuit? Would Sterling counter sue or something? Or does he not have to pay legal fees if he wins the case?
Don't really know anything about the guy and haven't watched his videos but I skipped around that interview and it'll be complete bullshit if he ends up losing money due to legal fees or whatever over this.
From what I gather they're claiming they were assaulted by people online who found out about them through Sterling, so they're blaming him. In the interview that got linked the guy also basically insinuates that Sterling is maliciously sending out minions to do his bidding.Assault? What did he assault? Your feelings?
Pathetic.
Doesn't that YouTube protection program Jim falls under include coverage of legal fees in a lawsuit up to a certain amount? I would hope that kicks in here, the source of all of this is claimed to be Jim's YouTube videos.
Doesn't that YouTube protection program Jim falls under include coverage of legal fees in a lawsuit up to a certain amount? I would hope that kicks in here, the source of all of this is claimed to be Jim's YouTube videos.
Wow @ that false equivalence. Sure, this is very much a "both sides are the same" situation right?They're both antagonistic children screaming for attention. The only difference is one of them has a fanbase for some unearthly reason. I'm sure Sterling continues to relish this "situation" as it continues to draw attention to himself for little to no effort on his part.
Let's not forget that the plaintiff doxed the defendant in an attempt to intimidate just a few months ago. Link to the thread about that. If memory serves, they even posted a photo of the street he lived on.
I don't see this case going anywhere, but I'd kind of like it to.
Assault? What did he assault? Your feelings?
Pathetic.
Might put some further context,
Jim Sterling Vs. Digital Homicide Interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhjXfAikKaY
Let's not forget that the plaintiff doxed the defendant in an attempt to intimidate just a few months ago. Link to the thread about that. If memory serves, they even posted a photo of the street he lived on.
I don't see this case going anywhere, but I'd kind of like it to.
Thats tosh matey, since day 1 DH have responded in a terrible way going back to the original "response video". Jim has frequently avoided reporting on some of their content to show that poor response toward them wasn't fuelled by a mob sent via his youtube channel. The infamous "Interview" containing the disturbing ramblings of DH only took place because they repeatedly badgered (and if I recall, insulted) Jim on social media.
If there has been any bullying done it has been from DH rather than from Jim, however they are as incompetent at bullying as they are everything else they do, and every punch they send to their "victim" hits their own face by mistake.
Jim is blameless in this.
Reading the complaint.
"Many of the The Defendant's subscribers are fanatical, young, and impressionable. These subscribers are easily mislead..."
lol. They sure know us.
They're both antagonistic children screaming for attention. The only difference is one of them has a fanbase for some unearthly reason. I'm sure Sterling continues to relish this "situation" as it continues to draw attention to himself for little to no effort on his part.
A) What statement in particular are they claiming is slanderous / libel?
B) Assault? Is it possible to commit assault over the Internet? Which country is this?
I just don't see the sense.
That dude's pseudo-intellectual way of trying to "turn the tables" by asking vague questions to Jim is so insufferable.Might put some further context,
Jim Sterling Vs. Digital Homicide Interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhjXfAikKaY
It says Arizona. Anyone know if you can sue an Englishman in American courts?
At the end of The Defendants [sic] video he encourages his viewers to investigate and they have accused that [sic] Cat Simulators [sic] developer of theft with improper investigation into the source of the products used and assumptions stated as facts rather than actual researched facts.
That dude's pseudo-intellectual way of trying to "turn the tables" by asking vague questions to Jim is so insufferable.
It says Arizona. Anyone know if you can sue an Englishman in American courts?
Holy shit. The English used is just a bunch of words cobbled together to sound well versed. It makes my brain itch. Some of the sentences make no fucking sense at all.
Example: