I question their results.
Something weird is up, the dx11 one seems high for the fury, and that 1440p one seems low for the fury.
I question their results.
I question their results.
I question their results.
One of the sellers was selling an asus strix, some quick research seems to show its decent, any knowledge about it?
A cheap and used 980Ti over a new 1070 sounds good, until you remember how Nvidia treated the 780Ti.
maybe they are testing a different area? hardware.fr is very reputable
"Having trouble deciding what to do. I'm looking for a 4k60fps solution (not doing sli again).
Seems as the 1080 may not cut it, I'm considering getting a 980ti for cheap(er) and holding out for a 1080ti. Or same thing but 1080 and then sell for 1080ti but I feel like I'll lose more money this way.
Suggestions?"
Don't spend money at all until there's actually 4k60fps cards if that's what you really want?
Unless AMD has invented a time machine and brought HBM2 back to October from 2017, I think it's highly unlikely we'll see Vega by then. I mean Nvidia already announced the Tesla P100 and that has HBM2 and they are saying early 2017 general availability for that.
Hitman has a benchmark mode.
This^^^
There is no 4k60 cards on the market, or a monitor market that is really geared to gamers at this resolution as of yet, for this exact reason.
What excites me about the 1080 and whatever AMD releases as a response this October (if rumours are true) is that these cards look INCREDIBLE for 3440x1440 ultrawide based on the results I'm seeing...
AHHHH SILKY SMOOTH WIDENESS
It's gon' be a good year for PC upgrades...
They're not the only ones. Somebody mentioned they correlate with digital Foundry's results.
No guarantee, but I think amd has hbm2 priority as they helped develop it.
I already posted TPU which is DX11 showing the 1080 beating the Fury X by 10+ fps. Here's Guru3D doing DX12, and the 1080 wins out by 12 fps. Hothardware puts it about 8 fps above the Fury X. It's also worth noting Hitman tends to be a bit more AMD friendly than other modern titles.
I see, this is why you can buy the Nvidia Tesla P100 with HBM2 right now if you happen to have $130,000 laying around for the DGX-1. Dat AMD priority amirite
Yo, it's only 129k, don't mislead people
Oh damn, I got called out D:
:3
I already posted TPU which is DX11 showing the 1080 beating the Fury X by 10+ fps. Here's Guru3D doing DX12, and the 1080 wins out by 12 fps. Hothardware puts it about 8 fps above the Fury X. It's also worth noting Hitman tends to be a bit more AMD friendly than other modern titles.
The Fury X is beating the 980 Ti, so you tell me?
The 6 GB 980 Ti IS RIGHT THERE LMAO
PCPer said:At 4K, the Fury X seems to be hitting a memory limit with consistent and repeatable stutters in the game play for a single frame. It does register as a decline in the FPS by percentile at about the 85th mark, dropping it below the results of the GTX 980 Ti for the remaining 15% of frame times
Oh damn, I got called out D:
:3
edit:
I'm actually curious, it looks like there are 2 USB 3.0 ports on the DGX-1, what the hell are those even used for lol
http://www.nvidia.com/object/deep-learning-system.html
However, the p100 doesn't speak to access to larger volumes of hbm2, but yeah probably unlikely that amd really does have some sort of access to lots of hbm2 that nvidia doesn't, but they probably should have wrote some damn contacts providing exclusive access for a certain amount of time given their investment.
VR? Lol maybe for deep vr learning
A cheap and used 980Ti over a new 1070 sounds good, until you remember how Nvidia treated the 780Ti.
How cheap? How used?
A cheap and used 980Ti over a new 1070 sounds good, until you remember how Nvidia treated the 780Ti.
Good call.Shits new to me, I've been doing some research and it seems true that NVIDIA fucks up old architectures, I was seriously thinking about buying a 980ti, but I'll wait and buy a 1070.
I suspect such contracts would only have been possible if AMD could guarantee purchases of some extremely large volume of HBM2 from Hynix. This is not possible since graphics cards aren't exactly a huge volume market. Besides, AMD and Hynix pursued standardization of HBM with JEDEC, it became such a thing in 2010 and once it's a JEDEC standard nobody has exclusivity over it anyways.
Can I run the prototype VRMMO Sword Art Online on my DGX-1? That would be an instant buy for me!
Well, this cements that I'm not going to bother getting a 4K TV when I move. Will be doing a new PC build with a 1070. 1080p will do me for a while.
Get a 21:9 monitor. Way more impressive than 4K as someone with both
I question their results.
Microcenter bruh. They've been having open box 980 tis for under 400. Once their in liquidation mode I bet they'll have new ones for 300ish. I got a brand new 290x from microcenter for $250 2 years ago.
Do you have a 40" 4:4:4 4k monitor? Much better for general use and media outside of games, and also games imo. And cheaper.
Me too. Why didn't you show all the results?
Maybe because it shows a 20% advantage for the 1080 while the others show only a 12-16%?
Compared to the 40% plus advantage in other games on the same site this is significant. Don't you think?
Damn Nice. No Micro Centers near me
40" 4K? I assume that'd be roughly the same DPI as a 34" 21:9 1440p, no? Hard to beat the 21:9 shape once you own one, tbqh. It's just too good.
Microcenter bruh. They've been having open box 980 tis for under 400. Once their in liquidation mode I bet they'll have new ones for 300ish. I got a brand new 290x from microcenter for $250 2 years ago.
Dpi is roughly the same, but the screen is bigger. My friend has a Dell 34 ultrawide and im like, meh.
don't go around buying a 980 ti used just yet until benchmarks for the 1070 is out >>;
hmmm maybe i should get another one. How is sli support for modern games? Is it coming to win 10 apps?
From my experience they only had those 1 day under $400 for open box and never again since. They don't have the new ones at $499 anymore either. Now they are back to regular price.
I'm disappointed and excited at the same time; I love the progression of tech but I was so sure that this gen would be another dud and that my 980 ti was a worthwhile purchase......lol at my stupidity and hubris. Now the question is, since I'm going to wait for the inevitable 1080ti, how much will my 980 ti sell for whenever I do sell it?
So will the 1080/1070 be a worthwhile upgrade for someone with a 970FTW?
Or should I wait for HBM2?
So will the 1080/1070 be a worthwhile upgrade for someone with a 970FTW?
Or should I wait for HBM2?
It's impossible to say, you can get around $400 for it now. When the 1080 Ti releases? No idea, could be worth $200 or less by then.
No guarantee, but I think amd has hbm2 priority as they helped develop it.
I see, this is why you can buy the Nvidia Tesla P100 with HBM2 right now if you happen to have $130,000 laying around for the DGX-1. Dat AMD priority amirite