Suikoguy said:We're also stuck with blurry, juddery, slow-panning 24fps movies forever because (thanks to 60fps home video) people associate high framerates with camcorders and cheap sitcoms, and thus think good framerates look "fake".
bone_and_sinew said:I agree, though everyone else in my family hates it as well.
DeathNote said:People keep calling it a "soap opera" effect. I don't know what that means. Is there a video showing the effect?
Also, my dad got a LCD listed at 120Hz, but it doesn't have a mode.
DeathNote said:People keep calling it a "soap opera" effect. I don't know what that means. Is there a video showing the effect?
Also, my dad got a LCD listed at 120Hz, but it doesn't have a mode.
I can understand that not playing something in native mode would look weird. I only catch a soap rarely at my grandmas house on a SDTV. I'm getting the feeling people think the soaps look bad? But, wouldn't movies in a native higher frame rate look better?Government-man said:They call it a soap-opera effect because they are normally shot with a higher framerate. Movies are normally shot in 24 fps, which is quite low.
DeathNote said:I can understand that not playing something in native mode would look weird. But, wouldn't movies in a native higher frame rate look better?
DeathNote said:I can understand that not playing something in native mode would look weird. But, wouldn't movies in a native higher frame rate look better?
What's the technical reason soaps make higher frame rate look cheap? Quality of camera and home television limitations?Government-man said:Yes, they would look more natural and smooth - more real life. Unfortunately because of soap -operas people now associate that look with cheap. I have not tried this particular technology myself but would like to see a higher frame rate become standard in the movie industry. Don't know why this hasn't happened yet. Of course it is more expensive using more 35mm (or 70) film but shouldn't problem for big budget movies or digitally filmed.
DeathNote said:What's the technical reason soaps make higher frame rate look cheap? Quality of camera and home television limitations?
DeathNote said:What's the technical reason soaps make higher frame rate look cheap? Quality of camera and home television limitations?
I generally like XKCD, but Munroe was way off base there.Suikoguy said:We're also stuck with blurry, juddery, slow-panning 24fps movies forever because (thanks to 60fps home video) people associate high framerates with camcorders and cheap sitcoms, and thus think good framerates look "fake".
Slumdog Millionaire winning the Oscar for Cinematography last night is meaningful to me in two nerdy ways.
[...]
But mostly what I love about Slumdog winning is the clips played all throughout the Academy Awards ceremonies. Of course the awards show highlights only the most emotionally resonant moments of the film (there are so many to choose from, it is a magnificent movie). And those emotional moments, almost without exception, featured key shots captured at 12 frames per second (or less) and double-printed for a staccato, dreamy feel.
That's right, in order to enhance the emotion, director Danny Boyle and cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle showed less. They showed less and communicated more.
[...]
Any TV you buy today will probably have that infernal motion smoothing turned on by default, so that you can enjoy your favorite films re-imaged as if they were PBS specials from 1983. Nobody seems to remember that audiences wouldn't accept video frame rates in dramatic narrative entertainment. We didn't want our cinema to look like soap operas before 24p HD cameras, and we don't now.
[...]
So television engineers and home theater nerds with nothing better to do, please stop trying to find ways to make movies more like reality. As you can see from this year's cinematography Oscar winner, film is at its best when it is unmistakeably unreal.
Because films aren't filmed for television?r.gun said:And for the record, it's beyond me how movies can still be filmed at 24p... how is that acceptable in this day and age where we have TV's and projectors with a significantly higher refresh rate!?
AVclub said:It blows my mind that people are turned off to stuff on their TV looking more real. Isn't the whole point of HD that our entertainment looks like we're seeing it through a window and not through a 24 frame per second slide show?
Why are nerds constantly upgrading their video cards to achieve higher frame rates in video games, but hate it when their tv shows and movies have a higher framerate?
I really like motion plus (or whatever you want to call it). My friend has it and I can't wait to get a TV that supports it. It's true that this mode makes it easier to see fake shit in movies, but the technology exists to fake things much better in Hollywood. So if they want us to buy the tech, then they should be working to make their products look better on it.
How does video game FPS work? Do they make it where 100+ FPS exist, and if you only get 60 it's good enough for most people?Xeke said:I don't want my TV making up frames that don't exist.
DeathNote said:How does video game FPS work? Do they make it where 100+ FPS are really there, and if you only get 60 it's good enough for most people?
Your brain does it...Xeke said:I don't want my TV making up frames that don't exist.
100FPS+ is a measure of system/GPU performance, and they say the human eye can't really perceive a difference if you go over 60FPS (unlike flies, which can see far more "fps")DeathNote said:How does video game FPS work? Do they make it where 100+ FPS exist, and if you only get 60 it's good enough for most people?
err, he means frames that aren't actually stored on the Blu-Ray or movie file, or frames that aren't generated by the actual PC or game console.Sir Fragula said:Your brain does it...
And it does a much better job at it.Sir Fragula said:Your brain does it...
Suikoguy said:
True. But then it's a matter of you wanting the process to be better, not absent.Xeke said:And it does a much better job at it.
Sir Fragula said:True. But then it's a matter of you wanting the process to be better, not absent.
Hilbert said:Animation algorithms tend to take in the framerate and adjust the animation frames to match.
Sir Fragula said:True. But then it's a matter of you wanting the process to be better, not absent.
Couldn't high quality cameras and post processing still make it look dream/fantasy like?Futureman said:As a visual artist interested in film/video, I like 24p because it DOESN'T look like reality. That doesn't mean HD is the irrelevant. I want 24p HD. The IMAGE is HD while the motion is more dream/fantasy like.