• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The most and least affordable housing markets in the world, 2017 edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

Klotera

Member
When I see the cost of living in other cities, makes it hard to think I'd be likely to leave KC. There are few, if any, cities that offer enough more than KC to make up for any cost of living difference.
 
I had no idea San Jose real estate was that sought after. I'm not from California - what's so great about San Jose? Is it b/c of silicon valley? Whenever I read about Cali real estate its usually San Francisco and LA that are mentioned.

San Jose and San Francisco are all part of the Bay Area which really is all the same region. So these charts are a little misleading because since they're so close to each other, when someone is looking for a place to live, both are an option and when you take your income and figure out what's more affordable, San Jose is more affordable than San Francisco despite their ranking being swapped. San Jose is actually the most affordable place in the South Bay Area compared to Campbell, Sunnyvale, Cupertino, Saratoga, Mountain View, and so forth. The reality is as housing got more expensive in those other areas, people started getting pushed out to San Jose.
 

RocknRola

Member
Hong Kong is crazy

8LfxCRe.jpg


VH__43.jpg


hong-kong-housing-crisis.jpg

Wow. Crazy is kinda putting it mildly :S I can't imagine living in those kind of buildings myself...
 

Woffls

Member
Dorset is interesting. Some areas are jokes because it is a coastal county next to a national park, but being 10th on this list is crazy because it has basically one metropolitan area... and that's being generous.

I assume this happens when people retire and move to the area, not to mention all the City folk who don't know what to do with all the money they have and just buy a holiday home.

The house prices themselves are reasonable considering the area. I guess there are just a lot of nice areas in Dorset.
 

lt519

Member
I have looked at the 750k house for fun and it is a monster of a house. It is definitely more of an exception than the norm in the area.

Yeah, I was mostly just supplementing the poster I quoted's point. The evaluation is weird. If you live in "Rochester proper" where the municipal lines are drawn, its is an accurate survey, but as soon as you drive 5 minutes out of the city, it gets expensive really really fast. Throw out the $750k house and still look at all the 150k+ houses neighboring the city, I'm not sure it qualifies the greater Rochester area as the most affordable housing market in the world.

Maybe it does and I'm just oblivious to how expensive it has gotten everywhere else, I've been trapped in CNY for 11 years now.
 

dejay

Banned
Yay, were' # 2! (least affordable)

My "starter" house, which is 50 km away from the CBD, has almost doubled in price since I bought it 6 years ago. It's good for me, bad for new home buyers, who have to compete with investors. Every year I think the bubble has to burst, but it just keeps going up.
 

DietRob

i've been begging for over 5 years.
Didn't realize Cincy was #3, makes sense tho. You can go long with $ here.
 
Sydney has excellent transport, look at areas with good rail links. Work fast though, even the less desirable areas on the outskirts are slowly getting gentrified. New builds over an hour away from Sydney CBD are hitting over a million based on future transport links going in.

We just said "Fuck this!" and moved to the Blue Mountains, 6 bedroom house on an acre for half of what we'd have paid where the wife works which is a 40 minute drive.

I heard that transport links were poor in Sydney, but maybe that's only compared to London. I used to think London was the most expensive for housing!

Castle Hill seems to be a decent area for a family home and there's a station being built.

Blue Mountains sounds nice, congrats on the move!
 

lt519

Member
While the cheap rent and more bang for my buck would be nice, I can't say I'd want to live in any of those places in the top 10.

Depends on your style. if you are into the small city living Oklahoma City is a neat city I've visited several times for work, with a major sports team, good weather, and a decent downtown scene. I could live there.
 

jstripes

Banned
Is the only reason Vancouver up there because of Chinese buying up houses to hide money from their government?

Pretty much.

Now that there's that foreign buyer tax, the Chinese have set their sights on Toronto. Prices are getting quite out of control here.
 
I had no idea San Jose real estate was that sought after. I'm not from California - what's so great about San Jose? Is it b/c of silicon valley? Whenever I read about Cali real estate its usually San Francisco and LA that are mentioned.

I live in San Jose (represent!) and I still can't understand how it's higher than San Francisco. There's no way I could afford anything in SF, but in SJ i was able to buy a house (albeit just barely)
 

simplayer

Member
San Jose and San Francisco are all part of the Bay Area which really is all the same region. So these charts are a little misleading because since they're so close to each other, when someone is looking for a place to live, both are an option and when you take your income and figure out what's more affordable, San Jose is more affordable than San Francisco despite their ranking being swapped. San Jose is actually the most affordable place in the South Bay Area compared to Campbell, Sunnyvale, Cupertino, Saratoga, Mountain View, and so forth. The reality is as housing got more expensive in those other areas, people started getting pushed out to San Jose.

Ya, you have to wonder if they just included all of Santa Clara County and called it "San Jose". Including Palo Alto and such can really raise the median.
 
i was considering moving to philly from portland, but the rental market didn't ultimately seem that much cheaper... i think these charts are more about home ownership, right?

also philly literally has garbage everywhere and the restaurants in portland are better
 
My sister, who has lived in Vancouver for almost a decade now, has decided that it's finally time to leave if she ever wants to actually be able to save up any money, to buy a house, or just to save. My mom and step dad, who have been there for probably 7 or 8 years have resigned themselves to just renting for the rest of their lives in Vancouver and work until they die since there is no hope of every being able to save for retirement in a city like that. Meanwhile, I'm living in bumfuck nowhere (Regina, SK), and can afford to buy a house and probably retire one day, but it's at the expense of my sanity....I'm not sure there is a right answer here, but I guess it's interesting to see Vancouver up that high. I didn't realize it had gotten more expensive than SF and NY.
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
I live in San Jose (represent!) and I still can't understand how it's higher than San Francisco. There's no way I could afford anything in SF, but in SJ i was able to buy a house (albeit just barely)

The numbers the report cites are a median house price of $1,000,000 and median income of $104,100 for San Jose, and $835,400/$90,400 for SF.
 

Alienfan

Member
Auckland's housing prices are insane, but unlike most of the cities on that list, Auckland's wages are trash to match
 

jabuseika

Member
Most of the least affordable are inflated due to all the Foreigners coming over and buying at high prices. Essentially sinking their investments into real state to cause an artificial bubble.

I hope that bubble pops soon, and these people move the fuck out.
 
The numbers the report cites are a median house price of $1,000,000 and median income of $104,100 for San Jose, and $835,400/$90,400 for SF.

I would be interested to see a similar study conducted where they use median price / sq ft instead of median home price. I bet SF would be #1, or very close.
 

riotous

Banned
I would be interested to see a similar study conducted where they use median price / sq ft instead of median home price. I bet SF would be #1, or very close.

My wife lived in San Jose for yeas; I get the impression that there's a lot of apartments for rent and not so many affordable homes or condos to purchase.

You'd see blocks and blocks of affordable apartments, but most of the actual houses you see were pretty nice and/or in little gated communes.

I bet if they included rental prices San Jose would drop from the list, particularly as you said, if they included per sq. ft. numbers.
 

harSon

Banned
My wife lived in San Jose for yeas; I get the impression that there's a lot of apartments for rent and not so many affordable homes or condos to purchase.

You'd see blocks and blocks of affordable apartments, but most of the actual houses you see were pretty nice and/or in little gated communes.

I bet if they included rental prices San Jose would drop from the list, particularly as you said, if they included per sq. ft. numbers.

What's your definition of affordable? Rental prices aren't as bad as San Francisco, but it probably costs $1600-$1700/month for a 300-400 sq ft studio in an area that's worth a shit.
 
My wife lived in San Jose for yeas; I get the impression that there's a lot of apartments for rent and not so many affordable homes or condos to purchase.

You'd see blocks and blocks of affordable apartments, but most of the actual houses you see were pretty nice and/or in little gated communes.

I bet if they included rental prices San Jose would drop from the list, particularly as you said, if they included per sq. ft. numbers.

I really doubt such nowadays. I've been browsing rentals in the area since my girlfriend and I are gonna be moving in together in the near future and basically all I'm seeing is $1800 - $2000 a month for a crappy one bedroom.

It's the entire bay area for the most part. I live in Hayward atm and it's barely any cheaper.
 
Auckland is just fucking ridiculous.

Consider the fact that our population is only around 1.5 millionish which is tiny compared to the other cities at the top of that list, and also consider that our land area is comparatively massive.

This is what happens when nobody lives in apartments.
 

Damaniel

Banned
There's a reason why the cheapest locations are cheapest, and it's not because they're nice places to live.

Portland market is still crazy. The Zillowestimate on our house is $350,000 more than what we paid for it 4 years ago.

Portland's housing market is in a huge bubble. Even out toward 82nd, prices are nuts. The house my parents lived in until about 10 years ago is a 1100 square foot 2 bedroom with unfinished basement, and its Zestimate is over $400k. I live out in Lents (often called 'Felony Flats', though it hardly deserves the title), and even my house has broken $300k. There are actually $1M houses close to the river in neighborhoods where the houses were maybe worth $300k back in 2009, and nearly everything in those locations costs at least $800k.
 

Baliis

Member
My wife lived in San Jose for yeas; I get the impression that there's a lot of apartments for rent and not so many affordable homes or condos to purchase.

You'd see blocks and blocks of affordable apartments, but most of the actual houses you see were pretty nice and/or in little gated communes.

I bet if they included rental prices San Jose would drop from the list, particularly as you said, if they included per sq. ft. numbers.

Around where I work in SJ they just built a ton of new apartments, but the rent is all like 2000+ a month for them, it's crazy. People here wonder why I commute into the city instead of living closer lol, I can't afford to live closer to work. Maybe once I pay off my student loans and all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom