• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Wkd BO 0407-0917 - Baby & the Beast still Going In Style, auds con. to Ghost ScarJo

Status
Not open for further replies.
Man, Covenant has me curious. That marketing is... not all that great. But it's selling the shit out of the Xenomorph & the Facehugger. Is that gonna be enough to counteract the rapid cooling on Prometheus, which has not enjoyed much of a post-theatrical release warm glow at all?

Because as of right now, I don't know that I see it clearing 50 OW like Prometheus did. But "hey, we got the monsters you like back in this one" could make up that difference.
 

kswiston

Member
Guardians look to be the first big movie after F8 hits, April is fairly slim otherwise.

Then Guardians is fairly safe until Alien: Covenant, unless we think Guy Ritchie's King Arthur movie will be big.

I just think that you need to look overseas for something like Guardians rather than domestically.

The first film was already within $100M or so of the realistic maximum for its genre/franchise. The sequel may increase domestically, but probably not by a ton. This leaves oversees, and particularly Asia where the MCU stuff is strongest.

Asia is not known for their love of Space Operas. Rogue One and Star Trek Beyond both underperformed there versus expectations in the past year. Guardians wasn't big in Asia the first time around, not even compared to Ant Man or Strange. Now it also has to work against poor exchange rates.
 
How does Sony's film studio even exist anymore? So any bombs. You'd think they'd at least change up the management.

Sony recently mentioned that they're thinking about selling both the film and TV divisions earlier this year. They do want to see how their summer films play out, though (particularly, if The Emoji Movie can be successful enough to spawn a franchise).


Oh god no why. ;_;

Was worried making Dom turned traitor would had caused the film to jump the shark for reviewers...
 

border

Member
The fact that this film is being made, and is supposed to kick off a multi-film series, is hilarious to me. I love the King Arthur stories, so if this is good I'll happily eat crow, but I'm really not seeing it.

I have no idea why Hollywood keeps trying to make a new King Arthur movie ever few years. Is it not obvious that people aren't interested?
 

UberTag

Member
Really happy to see Your Name posting such solid numbers. Doing over 5k per theater makes a decent expansion either next week or tge one after more likely as well.

Great movie if you haven't seen it yet btw.
Pretty damn impressive given the number of those theaters only having 1 or 2 screenings.
 
Baffling opinion of Kong considering Gareth Edwards' anemic Godzilla kicked off the universe.

Yeah Kong was far easier to sit through than Godzilla. Edwards even managed to make a star wars ensemble movie set in pre-new hope period boring as shit too. Pretty impressive in a bad way.

Really I think the crossover should go to Dougherty tho. I have a lot of faith in his Godzilla 2 being the best of the kaiju movies easy. And coming off of trick r treat and then krampus I get Joe Dante vibes from him.
 
I would like to just point out right now that, of 3 movies featured in the famous endless_trash.gif that have been releases so far (50 Shades, Power Rangers and now Smurfs), all 3 have RT scores below 50% and 2 of 3 wound up being Bombas.
 

kswiston

Member
Here's an interesting article looking at the importance of China in the worldwide studio revenue of films that get released there. http://chinafilminsider.com/how-important-is-china-to-hollywoods-bottom-line/

The article found that China accounted for about $500M of the estimated $6.5B worldwide net revenue for the 32 pictures that had Chinese profit sharing deals. The biggest outlier were Warcraft (38% of its revenue from China), and TMNT 2 (15% of its revenue from China). Most of the rest made less than 5% of their worldwide revenue in China.

While we talk about China saving certain films, that is largely from a PR standpoint.

I would like to just point out right now that, of 3 movies featured in the famous endless_trash.gif that have been releases so far (50 Shades, Power Rangers and now Smurfs), all 3 have RT scores below 50% and 2 of 3 wound up being Bombas.

If I had to put money on one of those being fresh, I would either go with IT or Baywatch. I wouldn't be surprised if they were all rotten though.
 

BumRush

Member
Man, Covenant has me curious. That marketing is... not all that great. But it's selling the shit out of the Xenomorph & the Facehugger. Is that gonna be enough to counteract the rapid cooling on Prometheus, which has not enjoyed much of a post-theatrical release warm glow at all?

Because as of right now, I don't know that I see it clearing 50 OW like Prometheus did. But "hey, we got the monsters you like back in this one" could make up that difference.

If it skews more towards horror, I think it might do quite well. But yeah the marketing hasn't really sold the movie, and that's coming from someone who adores the franchise.
 
Alien Covenant is an interesting case. A lot of people in my age group (millennials) thinks it looks like shit and will be just as bad as Prometheus. On the other hand, friends and family of mine who are over the age of 30 are actually excited for it/liked the trailers. I know thats entirely anecdotal.

I am really curious to see how well Alien: Covenant performs at the box office. Hope the movie is solid.
 

Trokil

Banned
Ghost in the L

Just out of curiosity, Ghost has overtaken Power Rangers in less than half that time, had a an international opening stronger or comparable to Ant-Man and will probably make twice or three times as much money as Power Rangers by only costing 10 millions more.

Power Rangers is a way more popular IP world wide, had similar or better reviews and no controversy and still made a third of the money on the international market. But somehow Ghost is the bomb, Scarlett has no star power. Which somehow is strange, when a live action anime can have the same numbers as Ant-Man. For example theaters around here are still very well booked with Ghost, while Power Rangers lost its audience in the first week. And Power Rangers is on TV for 20 years already around here, still Ghost blow it out of the water pretty much everywhere expect the US.

So if Ghost is a bomb, is Power Rangers a disaster of apocalyptic proportions? Also Ghost has past Ghostbusters on the international market probably by the end of the week.
 

Busty

Banned
$117M worldwide for Power Rangers after this weekend.

That is absolutely fucking pitiful. Despite a largely solid, at best, US gross that worldwide number firmly puts Power Rangers in the outright bomb category.

I'm not sure that even toys sold that well. I think what was initially reported as a 'win' has now turned into a bitter loss for Lionsgate.

Man, Covenant has me curious. That marketing is... not all that great. But it's selling the shit out of the Xenomorph & the Facehugger. Is that gonna be enough to counteract the rapid cooling on Prometheus, which has not enjoyed much of a post-theatrical release warm glow at all?

Because as of right now, I don't know that I see it clearing 50 OW like Prometheus did. But "hey, we got the monsters you like back in this one" could make up that difference.

I definitely have Covenant in the 'underperform' category. I just cannot see any way that this film ends up being even remotely good.

I also feel like, despite all his talk of six films, Sir Ridley is jumping ship in this film by booking that kidnap drama at Sony/Imperative. There's a reason that his name was supposedly in the running for The Batman, you book your next film before the current one bombs.

Yes, Matt Reeves booked The Batman before his next Apes film comes out but he's not actually working on that until July, Scott's already casting his kidnap drama.
 

mreddie

Member
Fate Comes to Those Who Seek it

I enjoyed Going in Style, sucks it didn't do much but ugh, Boss Baby.

SMurfs are fucked.
 
I have no idea why Hollywood keeps trying to make a new King Arthur movie ever few years. Is it not obvious that people aren't interested?

same with the monster movies. Due to someone bringing up Van Helsing (2004) over in the 'movies you watched' thread of this month, I went ahead and rewatched it and it's still the best of all the attempts to remake any of them combined and it make a measly 300 million on a 165 million budget, with 150 of gross being US domestic. Granted, if it came out today I'm sure China would appreciate it a lot more for the great schlockfest it is, but the reality is that nobody is looking for ANOTHER attempt at ANY of these monster movies.

If Van Helsing can't do it, Robert DeNiro in straight-up drama can't do it, and even going low-budget and dirty with 'I, Frankenstein' or going higher level with Victor Frankenstein can't do it, it's time to call the patient on its actual state and declare it dead. Not undead, just dead.

But they are all public domain, so no licensing fees and a story that already works tend to get producers all excited. So that's why those keep coming back.


edit: I'm kind of jumping with joy from Power Rangers relatively bombing in that whole 'called it' Schadenfreude way. Also, that ad placement is like 'fuck this movie', so yeah.

500.gif
 

BumRush

Member
Is it too early for apes projections? Really pulling for that one out all of the movies this summer (and Dunkirk) to do well

Apes will do well. I don't really see it bombing unless it's shit. The last one made 200M dom / 700M tot, so even if it makes 2/3 of that, it still wouldn't be a bomb at all.
 

mreddie

Member
Sony also reined in costs. “Smurfs: The Lost Village” has a $60 million production budget, a fraction of the previous two entries’ price tag. However, the weak result extends a punishing period for Sony. The studio has been dogged by bombs such as “Life” and “Inferno,” while highly anticipated releases such as “Passengers,” a science-fiction romance with Chris Pratt and Jennifer Lawrence, struggled to turn a profit.

They don't deserve fucking Spider Man and that money at this point.
 

kswiston

Member
Just out of curiosity, Ghost has overtaken Power Rangers in less than half that time, had a an international opening stronger or comparable to Ant-Man and will probably make twice or three times as much money as Power Rangers by only costing 10 millions more.

Power Rangers is a way more popular IP world wide, had similar or better reviews and no controversy and still made a third of the money on the international market. But somehow Ghost is the bomb, Scarlett has no star power. Which somehow is strange, when a live action anime can have the same numbers as Ant-Man. For example theaters around here are still very well booked with Ghost, while Power Rangers lost its audience in the first week. And Power Rangers is on TV for 20 years already around here, still Ghost blow it out of the water pretty much everywhere expect the US.

So if Ghost is a bomb, is Power Rangers a disaster of apocalyptic proportions? Also Ghost has past Ghostbusters on the international market probably by the end of the week.

I left this post alone earlier, because I was on my phone.

I'm curious where you are getting the Ant-Man comparison from though. Ghost in the Shell won't end up anywhere near Ant-Man overseas. That film finished with almost $340M in foreign gross.

On the surface, GitS' second weekend take overseas looks pretty good. However, $21.3M of that was China, so we're really looking at $20M for the remaining overseas territories. The film also opened in Japan ($3.2M estimate), India, and a handful of small territories this weekend. Given that last weekend was $40M overseas, that means that the holdover territories had a similar 60% drop to the domestic box office take.

Ghost in the Shell has no more major openings left ahead of it, and is showing poor legs. Given that Fate of the Furious is opening next weekend, it is also expected to have a rapid drop off in China (which was fueling this weekend's box office). If the film manages to avoid a total collapse elsewhere, you might end up with a $200M worldwide box office finish.

It will not finish with 2-3x the gross that Power Rangers manages worldwide. Power Rangers still has South Korea, China, and Japan left to open with, so even with modest grosses in all three, it has a decent shot at $150M+ when you factor in holdover business. Furthermore, if we are approaching this from a financial standpoint, Power Rangers will end up with about twice as much domestically as GitS will. As mentioned in the article about China I linked above, Domestic gross is still the most important factor.

On top of all of the above, Power Rangers wasn't really a success story, so I'm not sure why that is your measuring stick. It made enough for Lionsgate to offset their personal costs, but the overseas performance will do further damage to their ability to pre-sell larger films going forward.
 
From the article in the OP

Dogged by “whitewashing” controversy after Scarlett Johansson nabbed a part intended for an Asian actress, “Ghost in the Shell” won’t stand a chance of recouping its $110 million production budget.

Meanwhile, the movie hit 124 million worldwide so it recouped its production budget already +14 million on top.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom