• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Why is there no major movement to legalize Prostitution?

GaryD

Member
My city has almost no street walkers since they allowed legal brothels and girls to work out of their homes legally. Works great for cleaning up the streets.
 

chadtwo

Member
Unfortunately there just really isn't a lot of political capital to be extracted from making it an issue.

It is interesting that there doesn't seem to be major grassroots movements to legalize it either, though.
 

Peltz

Member
Unfortunately there just really isn't a lot of political capital to be extracted from making it an issue.

It is interesting that there doesn't seem to be major grassroots movements to legalize it either, though.
Not really when you consider the need for privacy of providers and consumers.
 

Dead Guy

Member
If this ever does happen, I'll be all for it. Regulation of this industry would save so many lives.

But North Americans hate sex for some reason so I don't think legalization will be coming for a long ass time
 

Neo C.

Member
It's not a clear left vs. right issue, it's very difficult to form a movement when there are so many opinions.

I'm all for legalizing it.
 

Iksenpets

Banned
It's associated with a lot of other crime and abuse towards women that would require a lot of regulation to manage, and while that would probably be cheaper than the costs of prohibition, prohibition's costs are largely invisible, versus having a big old item in the state budget for the Department of Sex Work Management.

Plus, neither the people who want to employ the services of sex workers not the people who want to be sex workers are terribly sympathetic audiences in the eyes of the American electorate. It's hard to find the people to go star in the commercial to talk about how decriminalization would benefit them like you had with gay couples in the gay marriage fight or medical patients for marijuana.

And then LGBT rights and marijuana legalization use up a lot of the oxygen for social libertarian politics. It's hard to argue that sex work warrants focus over those issues, and the public has limited bandwidth for these things.
 
If this ever does happen, I'll be all for it. Regulation of this industry would save so many lives.

But North Americans hate sex for some reason so I don't think legalization will be coming for a long ass time

Don't lump Canada in with the U.S. Our Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that prostitution laws were unconstitutional, and even though our then-Conservative government tried getting around the issue with a new law that allowed sex to be sold but not bought, sex worker advocates have been promising to fight the new law too. I don't think the change will be happening before 2020, but if Canada's prostitution laws haven't changed significantly within the decade, I'd be surprised.
 

Budi

Member
Have you seen Bayonetta threads? Sexuality is frowned upon. A game was recently removed from Steam because of sexual content.
Looked this game up, apparently it has been returned to Steam but with black censor bars. Also the "storyline" described below has been altered.
While Eek Games' has expressed confusion at the reasoning behind House Party being removed from sale, GamesIndustry.biz has learned that one of its storylines can result in a female character being blackmailed into a sexual act using nude photos stolen from her phone.
 
To me, the issue of prostitution is like the issue of abortion. It's about protecting women.

Nobody goes out and wants to be a prostitute or have a bunch of abortions for the fun of it. It's not a fun experience, but it's going to happen, legally or illegally.


Why? Because we're animals, and highly primal. So if keeping it illegal does nothing but harm to the woman who is in this situation because she is desperate, not because you thought it was a nice alternative to go skiing in Aspen, I really don't see how you can argue for that keeping illegal is a good way.


A previous poster mentioned that it should be illegal because prostitution devalues women. I don't know if that is true.
In Denmark prostitution is important. We have thousands and thousands of people; disabled, handicapped, disfigured, lonely, depressed, and others who are unable to be with someone physical, but who still have a sexuality, and a need for it.

Many people don't think about this at all. Many people don't think about that a person with down syndrome or a person who is paralized in a wheelchair, don't also have sexual urges, and who cannot get any affection.


You can be your ass that human trafficking is important to address, but that is not affected by illegal or legal prostitution. Human slavery is illegal and a crime against humanity. These people do this regardless of its status.

One of the big problems we have is that people who buy sex cannot tell if a person is a sex slave. That might sound weird, but it can be difficult.
Many prostitutes are on the verge of destruction. Many are hopelessly addicted to drugs and/or alcohols, others have mental and psychological problems that make them unable to cope normally.

And so, as a client who buys sex, it can be difficult to see the difference between a woman who is in poor health and a woman who is brought from elsewhere. In Europe we have many legals who are not sex trafficked, but who still doesn't speak the language and who moves between countries for work.
There are also women who get out of it. For some, it's a desperate way to get out- Like porn or stripping. And they manage to do it for a bit, and then find something else.



In my opinion, there should be a noble profession associated with being a intimacy / sex worker. Because I think you'd be surprised just how many people buy intimacy with a prostitute, and not to have sex with her/him. Many people are extremely lonely and it's a massive, massive health concern.

"It's a sin to judge a man by his post" is a term that comes to mind. I don't care about prudes devaluing women. Fuck what other people think. Don't make this harder for them than it already is. When you don't have other options, and you're desperate and you cannot get help, you don't want the only thing you got taken away from you.

And that's exactly how I look at abortion as well. What someone personally feels about it is not the chief concern here. And making it illegal is not going to stop it. It just means she might have to self mutilate herself with a coat hanger and a pair of scissors at home. Just because you don't hear about it or think about it, doesn't mean it doesn't happen.


It's really not pleasant. It's very sad. But it's all they got. Because we live in a world with millions of people who have fallen underneath society and they cannot get help or get up. It's throwing rocks at them as they are laying in the gutter and judging them and their life choices. We really have to stop being that.
 

chadtwo

Member
Not really when you consider the need for privacy of providers and consumers.

Why would that be a necessity for such a movement? There are myriad reasons for pushing for legalization that have nothing to with one's desire to make personal use of it, once legal.
 

Izuna

Banned
I was fortunate to have a conversation about this topic with a colleague that worked with victims of human trafficking in the US.

She shared with me that when ti comes to policy supporting legalization people are concerned that individuals still would not have actual agency of their decision. The argument is that a student graduating from a good state school will probably not consider going into the line of work but if they do they have the resources to leave.

A single parent of two or a low skilled worker would have less resources to leave once working and would have higher pressure getting into that line of work to provide for themselves since there is really no skill needed or barrier of entry.

All of this is common sense too. It's exploitation and the vast majority of workers would rather to do something else. There isn't a massive health benefit to prostitution like Japan would claim there is (what they consider prostitution is sex, and sex is only vaginally sex to them).

The point is that it shouldn't be how people make a living because it is the young people who and poor/unskilled who are preyed on. And those who are making the most profits won't be the girls.
 

Dead Guy

Member
Don't lump Canada in with the U.S. Our Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that prostitution laws were unconstitutional, and even though our then-Conservative government tried getting around the issue with a new law that allowed sex to be sold but not bought, sex worker advocates have been promising to fight the new law too. I don't think the change will be happening before 2020, but if Canada's prostitution laws haven't changed significantly within the decade, I'd be surprised.

Well hopefully something comes out of it.

As for my 'North Americans' comment I was talking more about the general public. I too am a Canadian and it's my experience that if anyone voices their support of legal prostitution you either get laughed out of the room or are seen as a creepy pervert.

However I do live in Saskatchewan right in the middle of the conservative stronghold in Canada so the east may be very different. Hell even strip clubs aren't allowed in this province anymore so I can't see a lot of people who would agree with me haha.

I do think that Canada will legalize before the states though, hopefully sooner rather than later
 
All of this is common sense too. It's exploitation and the vast majority of workers would rather to do something else. There isn't a massive health benefit to prostitution like Japan would claim there is (what they consider prostitution is sex, and sex is only vaginally sex to them).

The point is that it shouldn't be how people make a living because it is the young people who and poor/unskilled who are preyed on. And those who are making the most profits won't be the girls.

Citation needed because that's not our experience in the Netherlands. There are some larger profits involved on the real estate side of things (since most realtors won't touch these facilities, it tends to end up with 1 or 2 businesses who can move with little competition) but from tax returns, we know that legal prostitutes as a collective make considerably more than the club owners that facilitate them.
 

Astral Dog

Member
There is no need, though it would be better for the health of the prostitutes, unfortunately nobody cares about prostitutes, there has to be a veil of a puritan society
 
I'm surprised pimps are even a thing anymore. I haven't seen a hooker outside in about 5 years. All any girl needs is a cell phone and a Craigslist ad.
 

DiscoJer

Member
America's Puritan heritage runs deep.

People say this, but like drugs, prostitution wasn't really illegal until modern times , the early 20th century. It was part of the whole reform society movement that also brought us alcohol prohibition and eugenics.
 

Kyzer

Banned
People dont want their kids to do it and its just not really this thing people like to proudly go and pick fights in favor of
 
The same reason that LGBT is discriminated against. That is, sex is something that can be enjoyed by all classes, so social elites demonize any form of sex that doesn't fall in line with the status quo that they control.

Otherwise, poor people might start enjoying their lives and take agency of their fate. "God doesn't want you to enjoy sex, also, don't complain about your substandard wages and lack of opportunity because all you need is God's love"
 

Bad_Boy

time to take my meds
We got bigger problems to worry about right now.

I feel like even legalizing weed has been put on the back burner.
 

Sai-kun

Banned
Why should the girl individually be allowed to discriminate? If it is just another job then they should not be allowed to run a business where they refuse to entertain a customer because of race, religion etc.
Not knowing how to do a hair style is very different though isn't it? I feel like you are dodging the question. If the girl says "I don't want to have sex with black/insert protected group here" do you believe we should use the same threats of fines (and prison if the fines are not payed) in order to force women to have sex?

this is hilarious lmao

They can deny their services to anyone same reason that people who work for themselves are not forced to take on every single bit of work they are asked to do? Not every artist takes every commission they're asked for. Unless they work for a brothel that's in a space open to the public, they're totally free to discriminate against whoever they want.

your post reads like some insane incel shit lmaooo
 
The point is that it shouldn't be how people make a living because it is the young people who and poor/unskilled who are preyed on. And those who are making the most profits won't be the girls.

you just described capitalism



the evils of capitalism can be mitigated through legislation, and the same is (probably) true for prostitution
 
this is hilarious lmao

They can deny their services to anyone same reason that people who work for themselves are not forced to take on every single bit of work they are asked to do? Not every artist takes every commission they're asked for. Unless they work for a brothel that's in a space open to the public, they're totally free to discriminate against whoever they want.

your post reads like some insane incel shit lmaooo

If you are operating a business then you cannot discriminate based on the person's race doesn't matter if its a one person sole trader or a full commercial enterprise.
If you own an house you can discriminate however you like as to who you let it and who you don't, if you turn that house into a bnb then you lose that right. If you are baking cakes for friends then you have the right to agree or decline as you want but if you set of a cake business then you lose that right.
It isn't hard to understand my point. If prostitution is "just like any other job" then we would have no problem fining people for discrimination. But it clearly isn't. Closing your eyes to that fact just makes you look silly. A person should have a complete and unfettered right to their body and they should be able to discriminate, but these rights do not align with the civil rights we have established for commercial businesses. One of these rights must bend as they are in direct contrast with one another.
 
It's not so black and white. There's a lot of exploitation of sex workers, even in countries where it's legal. Don't try to sell it as something 'obvious', it's a sensitive issue, and needs to be dealt with as such.
 

driggonny

Banned
This used to be my field before I moved to counter-terrorism.

The quoted reports state that legalization means more reports of human trafficking, in other words more discovery. That's a logical consequence of sex workers and their enablers being more cooperative and open with the authorities - suddenly stuff that was underground comes to the surface.

Nowhere is there any credible evidence that the number of actual trafficked human beings goes up or down based on policy measures. The total sum of human trafficking is, in law enforcement terms, a 'dark number' - our best criminologists can only estimate the volume but it's impossible to measure accurately as of 2017.

More discovery does NOT mean that legalization 'leads to' more human trafficking. More discovery is a good thing for those of us who prefer to fight this evil with the clearest possible picture.

But a lot of policy makers and citizens would prefer to have the problem disappear under the rug so we can pretend it's not happening in the shadows.

This seems like a pretty important perspective that not many people noticed? Or am I missing something?
 

Peltz

Member
If you are operating a business then you cannot discriminate based on the person's race doesn't matter if its a one person sole trader or a full commercial enterprise.
If you own an house you can discriminate however you like as to who you let it and who you don't, if you turn that house into a bnb then you lose that right. If you are baking cakes for friends then you have the right to agree or decline as you want but if you set of a cake business then you lose that right.
It isn't hard to understand my point. If prostitution is "just like any other job" then we would have no problem fining people for discrimination. But it clearly isn't. Closing your eyes to that fact just makes you look silly. A person should have a complete and unfettered right to their body and they should be able to discriminate, but these rights do not align with the civil rights we have established for commercial businesses. One of these rights must bend as they are in direct contrast with one another.
In the United States, that's only true in most states if you engage in interstate commerce. I don't believe that would be the case for most prostitutes if legalized.

Many small business that don't engage in interstate commerce can legally discriminate on the basis of race.
 

Acerac

Banned
In prostitution, one person pays another for sexual gratification.
In porn, a third party pays one or multiple people for sexual gratification, which others then also pay for and consume for the same purpose.

In places where paying in exchange for sex is illegal, it is often perfectly legal to pay for sex if it's being filled for sale or ad generation.
Fairly straightforward when you spell it out like that, and a point I can't really disagree with.

Cheers.
 
One day I hope to get a legal rub and tug at a massage place in America. As of now those places run the risk of being raided

You can go to the bunny ranch and go to town.

Don't lump Canada in with the U.S. Our Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that prostitution laws were unconstitutional, and even though our then-Conservative government tried getting around the issue with a new law that allowed sex to be sold but not bought, sex worker advocates have been promising to fight the new law too. I don't think the change will be happening before 2020, but if Canada's prostitution laws haven't changed significantly within the decade, I'd be surprised.

Right. There are actually places in the US where prostitution is legal and regulated, and have been so since forever.

What I would like to see is prostitution legalization and regulation being put on a ballot somewhere. CA or HI was rumored and supposed to do it IIRC. CO opened the marijuana legalization pandora's box. MA did the same for gay marriage. Someone needs to take charge and get this on the ballot.
 

g11

Member
Seems like it's one of those things that makes so much sense but that the majority of people would only see the benefit once it was legalized or decriminalized (like certain drugs), while a vocal and politically powerful minority refuse to accept facts and would rather treat prostitution as something that can be eradicated through punishment and prayer, much like their position on drug use or even teenage pregnancy. They aren't interested in lesser or safer prostitution, drug use, or teenage pregnancy. Their stance is eradication or nothing and so you get mandatory minimums for drugs, abstinence instead of contraceptives, and prostitution relegated to shady dealings that put women in danger and potentially encourages sex trafficking.
 

Keri

Member
I don't understand these "puritanical" comments. People oppose prostitution for far more nuanced reasons than "puritanical roots."

Prostitution, arguably the most controversial of the "vice" industries, is unpopular because people feel it commodifies women. They view sex for pay as coercive, not consensual. Feminist opposition to prostitution is based on the belief that prostitution is a misogynist construct to begin with and industrializing it legitimizes the idea that women are for sale.

There are other arguments that interpret sex as a form of labor and no different than any other labor-intensive occupation. There are arguments that women should be able to do whatever they want with their bodies. There are arguments that commercialized prostitution validates everything feminists oppose pertaining to the objectification of their sex and there are arguments that commercial prostitution liberates and deregulates women to make decisions about their own sexuality.

There is an immense amount of argument to be had over this topic and no conclusion, for or against, is "common sense."

This post touches on many of the issues I have with prostitution. While I strongly believe in protecting sex workers, I am not convinced that the legalization of prostitution would be an overall improvement for women. In a society where women are valued primarily for sex, it's a fine line between purchasing sex and just purchasing women.
 

Kthulhu

Member
Friendly reminder that prostitution is legal in parts of Nevada. It is regulated, but as far as I know there aren't any serious issue.
 

alejob

Member
Because
A: I shouldn't have to pay for, if anything they should be paying me(
I know, it makes no sense
)
B: You'd have to marry your hooker first.
 
This seems like a pretty important perspective that not many people noticed? Or am I missing something?

Nah, this is a worldwide phenomenon; many people just viscerally dislike the concept of prostitution, on all sides of the political spectrum and they really want to keep using the spectre of human trafficking to polarize the debate.

As someone who has dealt with victims firsthand, I can vouch that human trafficking is horrible in every way... But I would still rather cooperate with a legalized sex industry than chasing these monsters when they're underground and we can't see the forest for the trees because society deems every facet of it criminal. I've also worked with countries that have super repressive laws against prostitution and, from what I can tell, their success rate against trafficking networks is nothing to write home about... Repression sounds good on paper but actually makes our job harder and more labor intensive.
 

traveler

Not Wario
Not that they'd necessarily support it, but I'm 99% certain prostitution would be an easier sell to Christians than abortion. Not sure how not having passed that milestone means anything. (I know for a fact I'd have an easier time convincing my hardcore conservative Christian family to support a candidate for who favored it over one who favored abortion, although I suppose it'd be unusual to find the two opinions separate.) Prostitution doesn't involve murder in their eyes, and the case for regulation in a legalized field to protect prostitutes from trafficking, abuse, and disease would be a more winning one than most of the cases for abortion to them.
 

typist

Member
Prostitution is already legal, as long as it's on camera =/
Dunno why it's prohibited off-camera, probably just stupid people being stupid
 

digdug2k

Member
My city has almost no street walkers since they allowed legal brothels and girls to work out of their homes legally. Works great for cleaning up the streets.
Bangkok has basically legal prostitution and I still get propositioned while I'm out walking around with my 2 year.

I'm not super against it in a society where there are enough social safety nets that women aren't doing it in order to keep themselves/family from starving. No one should have to decide between being fucked and starving to death. But I'm not sure that society actually exists anywhere.
 
Posting in intelligent thread.

That's an old debate. These things happens regardless. The problem is wouldnt legalize it leads to accept it as a norm in our society ?

Prostitution is a norm in society and it's bananas to claim that it's some disease that can be removed.

I'm very strongly in favour of legalisation in the UK. Even though folks say prostitution is legal here, the actual legislative system is one of the worst possible arrangements I can think of, in that it makes it legal to buy and sell sex but only privately as an arrangement. Ergo you get all the criminality of those who exploit sex workers, all of the street walking, and absolutely no accountability.

You're usually talking about exceptionally vulnerable people, overwhelmingly women.

"Legalisation" is a big word and a big task. It should be done as a process and a set of phases, but the absolute first thing that needs to be done is for society to stick a hand out to sex workers and get them better conditions. I don't frankly care all that much about what happens between the sheets.
 
Why should the girl individually be allowed to discriminate? If it is just another job then they should not be allowed to run a business where they refuse to entertain a customer because of race, religion etc.
Not knowing how to do a hair style is very different though isn't it? I feel like you are dodging the question. If the girl says "I don't want to have sex with black/insert protected group here" do you believe we should use the same threats of fines (and prison if the fines are not payed) in order to force women to have sex?

Sex is a personal service and forcing someone to do it against their will goes against the Thirteenth Amendment.

The brothel itself would be a place of accommodation and required to serve them under the Civil Rights Act, but an employer could not compel an employee to have sexual intercourse with someone they don't want to, even if that is their job.

If the brothel was a private club, which required a membership, they would have more leeway in discriminating. But we are assuming a brothel open to the public.
 
Top Bottom